• Wild_Mastic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    208
    ·
    24 days ago

    Meanwhile, 10 euros per vial here in Europe. At least his original plan for widespread and easy availability has partially succeeded.

    • ChilledPeppers@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      78
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      In brazil 36 reais (about 6 euro). The US is a joke. (And im 99% sure you can also get it for free if you use the public health network)

      • mika_mika@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        49
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        I have mental health disabilities in the USA and my meds are at zero cost because I literally have had absolute zero income for the past 5 years.

        You wouldn’t believe how much those mood stabilizer/antidepressant cocktails stack up proportionally when I was able to scrape by on $15 an hour.

        The system set me up to fail with how shitty it is, if healthcare wasn’t crap I could be contributing to society without crippling myself.

    • MissJinx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 days ago

      Even worst, my dog got it for free from the public vet university for years. They even gave us the syringes. It’s the same human insulin and my dog got it for free. Guess his plan worked better than he thought… only no in the us

    • djdarren@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 days ago

      Free on the NHS in the UK. In fact, diabetes is one of the conditions that qualifies people for free prescriptions across the board.

  • BootLoop@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    141
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    Canadians: invented drug and patent it freely

    Americans: Finds way to kill the most people possible while making the most amount of money

    • Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      ·
      24 days ago

      To be fair, the killing isn’t the point; they’re the product. Its just that profit is God, so killing in its name is justified.

      Killing poors for the joy of it? That’s just an evil bonus.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      24 days ago

      the OOC might be TYPE 1 which is even more dependant on insulin than type 2, because you’re pancreas cant make any insulin at all. plus there also other expenses that comes with being type 1. CGM, INSULIN pumps(which are often regularly replaced because they wear out). you can sometimes tell when someones type 1, if they have a device attached to thier arm, its usually a circular button, thats the sensor(its another cost)

      • buttnugget@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        24 days ago

        I’m sure they’re Type 1. At least with Type 2 you can kind of manage it a little without the meds. The insurance company should be firebombed for refusing to replace the damaged meds.

      • psud@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        The sensor is no guarantee. Quite a few low carb dieters use constant glucose monitors (CGMs) to identify which foods they should avoid

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    24 days ago

    If you talk about killing the few people like these that are the root cause of all these problems, you’re a terrorist. You go to jail

    These people actually kill people by the thousands, millions, and we call them smart CEO’s and celebrate them 🥂

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      There is plenty of propaganda on social media to exalt the billionaires and CEOs. Instagram is especially really bad at it. I don’t know why the algorithm suggest heavily to me about “entrepreneur” pages (maybe my investing platform sold my data), although some of these pages whitewash literal fraudulent and underhanded behaviours from celebrity CEOs and fraudsters, spinning their past behaviours as “another way to get rich”. I also think the posts and profiles were written by bots, because the language and syntax used sound almost identical from one another, in spite of these profiles supposedly being independent from one another.

  • TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    I wonder if all the sane Americans did a mass exodus to Canada, Europe, UK, Australia etc, what effect that would have

    • PunnyName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      100
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      A lot of us would need financial sponsorship. So there’d be a literal financial drain on those economies.

      I still would like to sign up.

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        73
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        24 days ago

        Not if you stayed, then it’s an investment. Money doesn’t just disappear when goes to poor people, they use it to buy things like food and stuff. It would only be a financial drain if you were sending that money back home.

        The North American mind cannot comprehend the benefits of supporting the poor.

        • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          32
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          24 days ago

          Perhaps strain would be a better word than drain - it would still be a short-mid term financial burden to take even a tiny fraction of the sane population from the US, it’s a big country. Sure would be nice if it could be arranged though…

          • Soup@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            23 days ago

            Don’t worry, there aren’t that many sane people in the US. A lot of them are under the impression that they’re sane because they take the “balanced” position, though, which is to say that they just choose whatever’s in between fascism and barely progressive policy while they call themselves intelligent.

            Frankly I’m not sure I’d want a bunch of people who cannot take accountability and who have such main-character energy they think that they would be allowed in while “bad” people wouldn’t be. We have enough problems with similar mindsets here in Canada and I really don’t want more of that except now they’re making it even harder to get away from our useless, conservative, Liberal(capital L) party.

            • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              23 days ago

              Ah yes - subjecting ideological refugeess to arbitrary purity tests, a true classic.

              • Soup@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                23 days ago

                Well that’s the thing, it wouldn’t be possible so the entire idea of “let us sane people come” is flawed from the start unless they truly believe that there should be a purity test and that they would pass it. Anyone who genuinely thinks that way should be immediately disqualified from immigrating based on their own idea of an ideological test.

                “I’m different though and there should be actual, real laws to permit to do particular things!” is not the position of someone who considers their community at large to any particularly special degree. And to be clear I’m all for banning hate speech and stuff because that’s a specific banned behaviour and not a specific allowed behaviour, and we have evidence to show that it can be as harmful as any physically violent attack.

        • PunnyName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          24 days ago

          I get that, the initial investment would be pretty significant.

          I’m not against it of course, I just think it’s necessary to understand the risks of any gamble.

        • klay1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          23 days ago

          It would only be a financial drain if you were sending that money back home.

          Only if you limit your view to your nation. ‘Back home’ across the border it would most likely also buy food etc. And that would be fine.

          The real drain is the infinite black hole of the rich guys pockets. That is where all the money is. Don’t blame people who send money to their loved ones to help, just because there is a border.

        • Kacarott@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          24 days ago

          This is correct, though the initial drain might still be too much if there was literally a big exodus all at once. Maybe if the refugees from the US distributed fairly evenly across the various countries it could work?

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      24 days ago

      Have you looked into what it takes to get a permanent visa to one of those countries? It’s not easy.

        • Pennomi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          24 days ago

          It is that hard, I’ve looked. You typically need to rank highly on a skill list AND have a relatively well-paying job offer. And if you think it’s hard interviewing in your own country, it’s far worse interviewing outside of it.

          • psud@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            22 days ago

            Australia and the US have a reciprocal agreement which makes it so any Australian who wants to emigrate to the US can, and quite a few Americans can easily move to Australia. On the America to Australia side it is always oversubscribed, so it’s moderately hard to get to Australia. I wonder if timing the application is important.

          • Fizz@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            24 days ago

            What are you comparing it to? Americans have a much easier path to permanent residency than a vast majority of the world.

            Take a look at the skills lists they aren’t that insane. Also you dont need to go straight for permanent residency you can start with a working visa which is easy to get.

            • Pennomi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              24 days ago

              In comparison yes, it’s easy. In practice it’s far outside the means of the average American. Hell, more than a quarter of all households in the US are living paycheck to paycheck right now. That’s effectively impossible.

        • fossilesque@mander.xyzOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          24 days ago

          You have to earn over something like 100k+ for the US to tax you. Salaries are lower here.

        • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          24 days ago

          You still have to file, but you don’t need to pay taxes unless you’re earning enough that the visa won’t be a problem.

          But, like, if you close everything out and never go back…

            • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              24 days ago

              But then what?

              Is a foreign government going to extradite you for missing paperwork and no outstanding tax debts (especially because everyone else thinks it’s nuts that we require nonresident citizens to file taxes)? I guess it’s possible, but it strikes me as very unlikely.

              But if you’re still financially attached to the US/likely to visit, they’ve got some power over you.

              I’m not a lawyer or an accountant (obviously. This is not best practices)

              • Redkid1324@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                23 days ago

                I hear ya but I wouldn’t put it past the government. You’re now a bargaining chip in future negotiations

              • turdcollector69@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                24 days ago

                Why would that strike you as unlikely? It’s extremely likely because most countries that people would want to flee to already have extradition agreements with the US.

                All the US has to do is declare you a fugitive and those countries will pick you up and ship you back.

                Especially with how petty this administration has been.

                • fossilesque@mander.xyzOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  24 days ago

                  It’s usually too expensive to justify pursuing international cases, nevertheless don’t fuck with the IRS lol. That being said, people moving abroad to escape debt, such as student loans is not altogether uncommon.

                • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  24 days ago

                  What do they get out of it? It’s expensive and you don’t even actually owe money. Plus, extradition agreements only cover either things that both countries consider illegal, or a set of very serious crimes, like murder, afaik.

        • fossilesque@mander.xyzOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          24 days ago

          No exit tax. Academia/skilled worker route, I’ve been beelining an out since I was a teenager and I qualify for EU citizenship on heritage, working on that. I would like to thank my now irl friends from thousands of hours on EU MMORPG servers for unintentionally guiding me out. 👾❤️👾 Love my girlies.

        • frank@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          24 days ago

          Exit tax is only if you give up your US citizenship, which you definitely can’t do if you don’t have another citizenship and even then it’s very often not required

    • turdcollector69@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      It’s already happening, there’s been a deluge of affluent people leaving the US.

      We’re still at the stage where it takes considerable privilege to just leave everything behind and pay the exit extortion (40% of all your shit).

      Once things get worse and people have nothing to leave behind you’ll start seeing the engineers/doctors escaping.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      the one that have money to migrate to another country have done it already. buts mostly PHD level professionals, rather difficult for people who only have a ms or bs with no established career already. unless you well off enough to be able to move.

      it would probably have to be millions, or 10s of millions (around 40ish million) suddenly moving out of the us, then the usa and that would would see real impact on brain drain and economy(especially the ones in key stem sectors, at some point it will affect israel pipelines(weapons tech and research, like MIT) from university), but then again most people are too content in the usa, and the massively propagandized people us has practically pacified them, and essentially made a cultural bubble of selfishness(hate taxes, guns,etc. propaganda)

    • WALLACE@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      Please no, there’s already people rioting over 3rd world citizens immigrating here, we don’t need to add Yanks to that group too

    • volvoxvsmarla@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      24 days ago

      Making an AI meme of Luigi as a Saint is one thing.

      Making a painting and having it casually displayed in your room is a whole other level.

      Also, I can’t believe it’s already been a year.

      • Formfiller@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        48
        ·
        edit-2
        24 days ago

        Yea I guess but my mom was destroyed by our cruel and heartless system. She’s gone now but painting this helped me reconnect with the glimmer of hope we all felt for a moment after this happened. It also helped process the trauma I myself went through as her caregiver not being able to access what she needed

        • volvoxvsmarla@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          24 days ago

          I am so, so sorry about your loss. I’m glad to hear that you were able to feel a beacon of hope last year, and that this painting was a way for you to cling on to it and feel it a little longer. I hope you find a way to keep holding on to it, and through that hope find the courage to not give up and try to support change instead whenever you can and have the strength and energy to do so. But I can’t even imagine how hard that must be. And most of all, carry the love you had for your mom in your heart despite the grief, and the disgust and hate for the system that led to her demise quicker than it had to be.

          I hope you don’t mind if I save that picture of yours.

        • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          23 days ago

          Symbols are powerful things. I’m not an American, but something that surprised me with Mangione was how people on the left and the right seemed to support him. It was a rare case of example of political unity amongst regular people.

          • psud@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            22 days ago

            It was incredible how right wing pundits were so disconnected from their audience, trying to promote outrage while their audience would have been popping champaign of they could afford it

  • macncheese@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    24 days ago

    California is contracting its own insulin supply and it’ll be available for $11 a pen starting Jan 1, 2026. I know not every state can or are willing to do this but just throwing out some examples and hopefully optimism to somehow fight the American decline from within it. We’re in a unique position as our state economy is larger than most countries but I am hopeful we will throw our weight around to counter the bs. https://www.chhs.ca.gov/blog/2025/10/17/governor-newsom-announces-affordable-calrx-insulin-11-a-pen-will-soon-be-available-for-purchase/

    • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      24 days ago

      Seems like something other states should get in on. Now that the program is established seems like it would not be as hard to pay into it and get a share of the product.

    • fullsquare@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      24 days ago

      I know not every state can or are willing to do this

      this kind of thing scales well, i see no reason why after california has it set up, other states couldn’t get insulin from them, or chip in

    • ronigami@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      23 days ago

      contracting is an interesting choice of word since it could mean decreasing

      • oftenawake@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 days ago

        It is! They’re trying to “compile” insulin on the smaller scale. Not home labs but local production. They haven’t managed it yet but I believe they will eventually.

      • reksas@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        23 days ago

        ceos are like head slaves on plantation. While they are pieces of collaborating shits, they are not the root of this rot. And even those that are, are so intertwined with everything that you cant fix this just by getting rid of them. All this shit is so annoying, since its so tangled up there is no clean way to deal with it and if you do it wrong, it just leads to something even worse.

      • Malfeasant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        23 days ago

        They are, actually. The point of patents and copyright is not to protect the creator- that’s a temporary effect. The point is to release the thing to the public afterwards. The problem is that capitalism corrupts the process and finds ways to make the temporary effects permanent. Disney has succeeded in making copyright last effectively forever.

      • Doomsider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        23 days ago

        Copyrights and patents generate enormous amounts of wealth from rent seeking. This wealth has been used to continue to entrench these draconian concepts into our legal and governmental systems.

        Even worse they have been used to stop the spread of information and monopolize development thus slowing down technological advancement. So many people have died so these clowns can make a buck.

        One could argue that artificial scarcity is a farce, but unless you have more money than the people who benefit from IP, your voice will not be heard on a policy level.

          • Doomsider@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            23 days ago

            Personally, I think that if small business capitalism actually existed then it would run contrary to that.

            There would be no need for copyright or patents. These systems create artificial scarcity which hinders society as a whole to benefit a minority.

            I feel like our existing system of laissez-faire capitalism fully embraces the rent seeking found in intellectual property.

            • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              23 days ago

              I think there is a balance to be made. Some anti capitalist measures are needed to encourage innovation. But the use of patent laws as a defence, or copyright to seek excessive rent are far too aggressive.

              • Doomsider@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                23 days ago

                If there is any chance of reform it would have to still appeal to all parties. We definitely need to think about solutions that have not been proposed before.

                As much as I would like to advocate for abolishment of IP, I recognize it is an unrealistic demand.

                After all, IP didn’t magically appear. It took hundreds of years of court cases and laws passed to get to the arguably ridiculous point we are now.

                • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  23 days ago

                  I like the idea of having to pay a fee to retain copyright. And that fee doubles every year.

                  It starts off low but after a decade or two it becomes more economical to let the copyright lapse.

                  Patents should be scrapped completely.

                • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  23 days ago

                  If there is any chance of reform it would have to still appeal to all parties.

                  There’s nothing such as change that appeals to all parties; that is not how that works. Change, good or bad, is forced by one segment of society over another, doubly so when it’s against the interests of the ultra-rich. Don’t compromise in advance.

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          23 days ago

          Anti free market policies can exist within a capitalist structure.

          Historical existence of patents doesn’t destroy capitalism, nor make patents less anti capitalist.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            23 days ago

            Okay here’s the thing: Calling policies that contribute to monopolies anti-capitalist makes no sense, because by this standard capitalism is anti-capitalist. It’s not like monopolies appear out of thin air; concentration of wealth into monopolies or oligopolies is the only possible equilibrium state under capitalism, so deflecting the effects of these monopolies as “anti-capitalist” is an appeal to fiction.

            • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              23 days ago

              It’s not like monopolies appear out of thin air;

              For patents and copyright this is exactly what happens. Adam Smith’s invisible hand of capitalism does not create these monpolistic protections naturally. They are an artificial construct of government. An enforced payment by society to creators and inventors.

    • quoll@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      23 days ago

      yeah. but more importantly your fucked up excuse for democracy is fucked.

      plenty of capitalist countries that don’t have this problem.

  • ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    24 days ago

    I genuinely think that in some third world countries, as part of the middle class, you can have a better life than in the USA.

    • MoonMelon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      23 days ago

      Something I’ve noticed is when untraveled people in the USA try to contextualize themselves with other countries they pick the worst examples they can think of. Favelas in Brazil or slums in South Africa for example. We do this to the point where our entire conception of countries (or in the case of Africa, continents) is the worst imagery we can think of. I think they genuinely don’t believe that, for all their troubles India, Brazil, Mexico, Nigeria, etc also have smartphones and big buildings and libraries and universities and laboratories, and educated people living decent lives.

      They also can’t see how the overcrowded jails full of pretrial prisoners, the barefoot children carrying buckets for water in Appalachia, the rundown schools full of illiterate kids, the impunity of rich private interests, the corrupt sheriffs and judges, and on and on, puts us in the company of the “third world countries”. Yes we have nice places too, but SO DO THEY. A broken society in the 21st century isn’t people living in mud huts, it’s children shitting in the street next to a glass skyscraper with LEED Platinum certification.

      • SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        23 days ago

        And it’s not just “overcrowded jails full of pretrial prisoners, the barefoot children carrying buckets for water in Appalachia” but the grad students in LA living out of their cars, or grandpa sleeping on a bus stop, or people in the Rockies surviving off roadkill and forage.

        Seattle tent cities/tiny homes make some Favelas look real swanky.

    • Zerush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      Logically, it’s not about how much money you make, it’s about purchasing power. It is irrelevant if you earn only $400 a month when you can eat well for $1 and pay $100 for your housing, you have free health care and education. That is the reality in some third world countries.

        • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          23 days ago

          Espousing an old no longer relevant definition to sound smarter and be “right” is peak lemmy/reddit behavior. Third world does mean poor now.

              • Reginald_T_Biter@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                23 days ago

                Strictly, technically every other way China is still third world. This concept of third world being poor seems to have originated from the common charity ads in the 90s and 2000s who loved the phrase, and from the American exceptionalism that thinks everything not American is dirty and poor.

                • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  23 days ago

                  Being poor is the only way a country is third world or not. Being politically related to America is not relevant to the present definition. So no, it is not “technically in every other way”. It just is not a third world country, period.

        • ManOMorphos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 days ago

          No one really uses that word in its Cold War context anymore. It’s the common term for “developing countries” and the like.

            • ManOMorphos@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              23 days ago

              You’re right that they either never learned what 1st-2nd-3rd world really means, or they forgot what they were taught in history class. Unfortunately it still is the main term to refer to poor countries even though it’s incorrect. Language seems to be biased towards the common meaning over the technically correct meaning.

        • psud@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 days ago

          It used to mean that. First World was US aligned (or at least US friendly), Second World was Soviet aligned, Third World was not aligned

          Now though, First World means developed nations, Third World means poor nations, Second World has fallen out of use

          • Reginald_T_Biter@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            21 days ago

            Only to those ignorant of it’s meaning. Developing nations is what people mean. Like people say third world, third to what? What’s first and second?

        • Zerush@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          23 days ago

          Spain isn’t third world, it already had shown the middle finger to Trump and also has few to do with Rusia. Third world countries don’t certainly mean people starving, the people there often have all what they need, but this, you’ll see few Ferraries there and chalets with swimming pool. Someone is rich, not necesarly because a lot of money, but because he need only few. We often enter in a rabbit hole of the consumism, spending a lot of money in things we really don’t need, we work like a dog to have enough money to pay a journey to Hawaii to recover us from the burnout, which we wouldn’t have working less, no needing this journey.

          • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            22 days ago

            Have you been to Spain? I’m not saying it is not better than where the US is headed to, but it’s a “western” country in Europe, with all the issues that come with it. Somewhat social market economy, but still suffering from the usual issues, including people driving Ferraris while others sleep on the street.

            Also, at least since Franco I don’t think anyone genuinely thinks of Spain as third world.

            • Zerush@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              22 days ago

              Well, I’m from Spain, also in Spain there are People with Ferraries (few) and also poor people, but there is nobody without food, because Spain has a strong social system and free healthcare for everyone. Nothing, absolute nothing to do with the US, it’s the opposite in almost everything. Luckily Spain has also little dependency on the US or Rusia, so it is also not much affected by Trumps Tariffs or Rusian Gaspolicy. Trump hates Spain.

        • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          23 days ago

          If you can eat well for $1 then it is definitely a poor country relative to the US. Differences in purchasing power are a direct result of differences in wealth.

          • Zerush@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            23 days ago

            I think that the US is a third world country, it’s rich but most money is used for weapons and to make richer the billonairs and big corporations, in the social and cultural sphere, it is one of the most backward in the world. Now with Trump the US is turning in a running gag for the most countries. A country where 40 milloncof citizen don’t have enough to eat at least 2 times a day, isn’t a rich country.

              • Zerush@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                23 days ago

                USA is an total dystopic country, any Banana Republic has more culture. US is only powerfull because use all the money for weapons, developed by foreigner scientifics. First world is anything else.

                You will say that the US is a first world country, it’s better for your health

    • ebolapie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      There’s a reason countries like Vietnam are so popular with digital nomads.

      • WALLACE@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        23 days ago

        My dream would be to get a remote nightshift job and live in a house by the beaches of south Thailand

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 days ago

        Not really. Poverty rates are higher, yes, but many middle income third world countries do have sizeable and growing middle classes. They’re called developing countries for a reason. The image of war-torn African countries where everyone works in mines isn’t really representative.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      23 days ago

      oh, it gets better. Baby born with Spinal and Muscle Atrophy? There is a cure! $2,500,000!

      They hold lotteries for doses, a few babies win, most babies die.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      24 days ago

      I would literally move if I could afford it and if it was even a little easier.

      Stockholm syndrome suggests we enjoy it or want to be here.

      • Kacarott@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        24 days ago

        In genuinely think that more countries should allow refugee status and (economical) protection to people from poverty stricken countries like the US.

    • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      Reminder that the term Stockholm Syndrome was coined to blame victims for being rightly more afraid of the police than their captors:

      In [Jess Hill’s] 2019 treatise on domestic violence See What You Made Me Do, Australian journalist Jess Hill described the syndrome as a “dubious pathology with no diagnostic criteria”, and stated that it is “riddled with misogyny and founded on a lie”; she also noted that a 2008 literature review revealed “most diagnoses [of Stockholm syndrome] are made by the media, not by psychologists or psychiatrists.” In particular, Hill’s analysis revealed that Stockholm authorities, responded to the robbery in a way that put the hostages at greater risk from the police than from their captors (hostage Kristin Enmark, who during the siege was granted a telephone call with Swedish Prime Minister Olof Palme, reported that Palme told her that the government would not negotiate with criminals); as well, she observed that Bejerot’s diagnosis of Enmark was made without ever having spoken to her.

      Otherwise, we probably agree that AmeriKKKans are a feckless, servile people.

      • fossilesque@mander.xyz
        shield
        OPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        23 days ago

        Mod note: Do not make personal attacks towards this user, lest I have to slap more knuckles with a ruler. You can engage with the critique respectfully, or it’s 📏 time.

      • QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        24 days ago

        Stockholm syndrome is a proposed condition to explain why hostages occasionally develop a psychological bond with their captors. It is named after an attempted bank robbery in 1973, in Stockholm, Sweden

        ?

        • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          24 days ago

          My comment was in response to a comment about AmeriKKKans having “Stockholm Syndrome”, which as it turns out is not a real or valuable diagnosis. However, I do not disagree with the implied critique of AmeriKKKan people as being feckless and servile people.

          • turdcollector69@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            24 days ago

            You lost me with thebrepeated “amerikkkan” thing.

            A: It completely undercuts the seriousness of your comment and makes the whole thing come off as a tirade by an edgy teenager.

            B: Jokes don’t get funnier every time you repeat them, it was mid the first time and eye roll worthy by the 3rd.

            I agree with your points, just sucks that you chose to present it in such a juvenile way.

            • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              24 days ago

              A: It completely undercuts the seriousness of your comment and makes the whole thing come off as a tirade by an edgy teenager.

              So you disagree with the tone and not what I’m saying? Because if so, that sounds like a “you” problem, i.e. you’re more interested in the tone of a message than its content.

              B: Jokes don’t get funnier every time you repeat them, it was mid the first time and eye roll worthy by the 3rd.

              It’s not a joke and it’s not supposed to be funny. I genuinely hate the USA and everything it stands for.

          • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            24 days ago

            i dont think STOckholm syndrome applies to a large population. brainwashing, propagandization is what its called.

      • mirshafie@europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        24 days ago

        Nils Bejerot was a total hack. He tried to ban comic books, and later transcribed that same energy in a war on drugs that has resulted in some of the worst health outcomes for drug users in Europe. Unfortunately his ability to be confidently incorrect swayed a lot of gullible rubes, and his legacy still casts a shadow over Sweden to this day.

        • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          24 days ago

          AmeriKKKa is a settler-colonialist project, and the entity and its defenders deserve zero respect. I mentioned AmeriKKKans because the person I replied to used Stockholm Syndrome to critique AmeriKKKans on a post critiquing the AmeriKKKan healthcare system, so critiquing AmeriKKKa is relevant here. And I don’t like spelling AmeriKKKa as part of USA correctly because (1) places like Central America and South America should be distinguished from the United States of AmeriKKKa, and (2) it offends the people who need to be offended, i.e. people who still feel affinity for the AmeriKKKan project and people who tone-police others who are just brutally honest in speaking their minds.

          You are literally posting from an anarchist Lemmy instance, why TF is this controversial to you?

  • ryannathans@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    Soo why sell the patent for $1 and have it be potentially exploited when you could hold onto it and licence use for free?

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      IIRC the insulin being sold now is manufactured differently and the patents are completely different anyway

      But overall your point is good

          • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            24 days ago

            This is a great way of phrasing things.

            Services that are necessary for life (like healthcare)…if other countries have figured out how to make it affordable/free (at point of use), any person or industry that tries to extract profit out of it is literally anti-American.

        • A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          24 days ago

          Bingo. It’s extortion and if the asshat in charge gave any kind of a real fuck about cheap medicine it should’ve been a day 1 fix.

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          24 days ago

          Absolutely. I’m just saying that the original guy selling the patent isn’t the reason that corporations can gouge Americans for insulin now.

      • thesystemisdown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        24 days ago

        The insulin produced now has benefited from advances in technology just like most things. The fast acting insulin is predictable and works in 45 minutes to an hour and a half. The original insulin took hours and wasn’t nearly as predictable or stable. Testing/monitoring technology has seen even more significant advances.

        I owe Banting and his colleagues my life, but it is different. That’s not to say that the continued well being of the public should be profitable and exclusive.

        • mirshafie@europe.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          24 days ago

          I mean insulin is about 10x more expensive in the USA compared to other Western countries. It’s cheaper still in lower income countries. Many European countries also have a price ceiling for medication, so your monthly cost for life-saving drugs is capped.

          I don’t know exactly why a manufacturer doesn’t set up production for much cheaper generics in the USA, but for whatever reason Americans are getting price gouged like Satan doesn’t believe in tomorrow.

          • icelimit@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            24 days ago

            Whatever reason? Simple reason: legal to maximize profits over people’s misfortunes.

            • Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              24 days ago

              To be fair, most Americans agree with the capitalist first approach right up until it affects them individually. If they were willing to help each other instead of believing that anyone other than themself is a freeloader and lazy, they would have the support that other countries take for granted.

              • GuyLivingHere@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                24 days ago

                They wouldn’t be ‘freedom loving’ or ‘American’ if they actually gave a shit about other people.

    • TheJesusaurus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      24 days ago

      It was sold to a Canadian public university to manage the patent for public good.

      They have, everywhere else in the world basically, insulin costs pennies.

      In America, they have been able to patent certain formulations and delivery methods, and they keep making marginal modifications to string the patents out to keep Americans locked in to absurd insulin prices.

      Was that the answer you thought it was going to be?

  • Digit@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    23 days ago

    Welcome to USA, I guess.

    In other countries, you could probably completely fill a fridge with insulin for $800.

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      23 days ago

      If you need a lot of different prescribed drugs then £114.50/year to cover every prescription you have is an option here. Otherwise £9.90 each.