It was not forced. She chose to. She could have coped in ways other than violence. Failure of the system to resolve things in a way you prefer is not justification for violent assault. It’s just barbarism.

And you’ll be in prison for life. What a great resolution.

People support all kinds of foolish and stupid things.

For violently assaulting someone, yes. The problem arose because children decided to do something hurtful to a child, not because the adults in the situation didn’t resolve it before it escalated to violence.

Then you should get your hearing checked. You’re just lashing out with insinuations because your reason is failing you. Will you also call me a doody head and storm off?

Only if your physical safety is at risk. You can’t roll up to a home and beat someone for sharing a picture on the internet, for example.

How do you enforce laws written about things that don’t exist?

The situation was not resolved when she attacked him and they were not done with it just because they didn’t immediately do what she wanted, neither were her parents.

Only if that danger is physical in nature. Feelings are not an excuse to be violent and she was punished for doing so. Lack of charges is a mercy the police and the victim extended to her given the circumstances, either still have legal standing to charge her. Her victim being charged is a separate, but related, thing.

She is still a perpetrator, she doesn’t need to be charged or convicted. She violently assaulted someone. That is not in dispute. That she isn’t charged is a mercy given by society because of the circumstances. The victim of her assault could still press charges if they wished.

Failure of society to address a grievance when it suits you does not justify forming a mob and violently attacking someone. She is not ethically justified violently assaulting someone because her feelings are hurt.

Managing emotions can’t be done through external acts, it is an internal act. Those systems she availed to were still working on the issue, instant gratification is not reasonable. Violence is not a reasonable or effective course of action, it is an impulsive and stupid one and it only made her life worse.

So everyone gets to throw hands and violently assault people whenever they feel bad, then?

So if a man is hurt by a woman and the world doesn’t stop that harm, is any degree of harm justified and any level of force necessary to end that harm, justified?

Society fails at justice all the time, but it will respond with force and punishment if you take justice into your own hands. The failure of society to adequately address these scenarios is one of the reasons exacting your own justice is unwise, because society will punish you for it, as it did to the girl when she tried. Violence is not acceptable.

It did naturally become worse. That’s what happens by not intervening, nature occurs. Becoming violent when you experience injustice only leads to more problems. It is not a wise or effective response.

There is no resolution through violence.

They have been.

Why don’t you ask the poster above what they meant by it and then we can discuss.

Feelings are not an excuse to become violent, even if you don’t see any other option than to suffer.

He’s damaging your property and putting your physical security at risk. Both are crimes of violence. It isn’t an emotional crime. If he says something mean, you don’t get to punch him.

1. She didn’t lash out of legalities.
2. Nobody claimed perfection
3. Violence doesn’t heal trauma
4. Her actions made the situation worse for herself and likely did not do anything to stop the sharing of images.

Responding to a non-physical threat with physical violence is not acceptable. Society did not force her, she chose to be violent.