• Mohamed@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    53 minutes ago

    A few years back, I was speaking to a roommate. I complained that the (then) new Star Trek had forced diversity. He immediately shut me down, “Star Trek has ALWAYS been like that”. He was a huge fan of Star Trek

  • gurty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Agreed. People should dislike modern Star Trek for it’s bad writing, not because it’s progressive.

    • Glytch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 minutes ago

      Trek writing has never been consistently good. Half of TOS is unwatchably bad. TNG sucks until Riker gets more hair. DS9 sucks until Sisko gets less hair. Voyager’s all over the place (even though it’s my favorite). Enterprise is mostly bad. Only the even numbered TOS movies are good. Only the first two TNG movies are good.

      I say this with a genuine love of Star Trek, but the quality of the writing has varied greatly over each individual series.

    • JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      47 minutes ago

      I mostly agree, but with shows like Starfleet Academy, the writing is bad in part because of the forced inclusive themes. You’re broadly correct: these could be handled with tact for a better show. I still think these themes are handled best when they give the audience room to consider nuanced and complex ideas. Don’t shoot me, but instead of a classic New Generation episode I’m going cite an episode of The Orville - “About a Girl”. Bortus and Klyden have a baby, who is born female. They try to argue that she should be allowed to remain female, but ultimately the court rules that she undergo the Moclan gender reassignment procedure.

      This touches on contemporary issues but also doesn’t present the situation as “this side is 100% right, and this side is literally Hitler.” The audience is actually left wondering, where does this sit in the contemporary debate? If a child is born one sex, should they be given the right to remain as that sex? Or should a court be allowed to step in and reassign sex? The episode also brilliantly explores the difficult dynamic between Bortus and Klyden, and doesn’t portray one as a cartoon villain and the other as a male Mary Sue.

      This is where New Trek fails horrible. Zero nuance. Everything is presented in the first 10 seconds as “this is good, this is bad. Accept the message we are feeding you are you are a bad person.” That’s not Star Trek. Most importantly, that’s not interesting. It’s not good storytelling. It might appeal to people who really like circlejerking about that particular issue, but that’s a minority of people.

    • Nierninwa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I believe it was also an old Shatner tweet (well, if memory serves, he technically asked when it got political) Surprised to see this shift from him. It’s a welcome one but I’m still not sure if I should trust this.

  • minorkeys@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The science fiction and adventure part of the show is absolute garbage. If it has been good, people would be able to have their cookie while being lectured to about what they should believe.

  • etherphon@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I didn’t personally care for it but I realized it wasn’t exactly for me so whatevs, just because there is a show in same universe as the other imaginary space shows I watch that I don’t like I realize I can just watch something else because I’m an adult (surely lol). It’s a damn shame scifi is full of such small minded persons, I certainly know scifi fandom has had a lot of problems in the past but things seemed to be improving, though I suspect this is more of a loud minority situation, unfortunately the loud minority are billionaires.

    • ATS1312@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I’m of the unpopular Opinion that SNW was @ boring rehash of anything I could get from any other show that already exists, and Academy was something fresh. All these irate chickenshits would love SFA if it just had the serial numbers filed off, except that “its woke” because it acknowledges that people just fucking exist.

      But hey, can’t jeopardize the popularity of a thing that’s someone else’s “property,” not even if that’s what it takes to live up to the actual legacy of the Original. Just leaving it to the community would actually let us make something beautiful, as we have done before, so that can’t be allowed.

      I guess we’re just gonna get more Original Series fanfic that lands hollow for me, maybe a hunting-terrorists spy flick, and another mindless cash-grab movie whose screenplay will probably be mostly written by AI.

      No more moral questions, no more interesting discussions of what an identity means, no more of what makes science fiction worthwhile as a genre - we have ships to explode - IN SPACE!!!1!!

      Prodigy, a show written for literal children will be more interesting a topical exploration than a Larry Ellison property.

      • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        What a muddy comment. Took me two reads to try to figure out the argument therein, after which I stopped.

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        i dont think SNW was that good, the acting is too wooden, and some of the endings in seasons were like"is that it"? prodigy and lower decks were way better. With ellision in control of trek IP, fans that are usually “left” leaning, how are they going to justify watching and supporting someone like ellison.

  • kbal@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    162
    ·
    14 hours ago

    These days it seems like most things getting called “woke DEI crap” are totally in line with the norms of society, but someone wants to change that.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      it applied to all SCI fi show both pre-STD(DISCOVERY) thats what really got thier panties in a wad, when kurtzman made all the women have lead roles.SG1 wasnt spared either, as recently Invincible was called woke, just because the female general in coalition took command of the ship (the planet of ragnarrs) to refreeze the beasts.

      there was definitely a concerted effort around 2020(thats when woke became super prominent in comments of shows like star trek) around election time to illicit more voters to side with conservatives through propaganda.

    • TransNeko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      11 hours ago

      the moment maga calls something woke… I embrace that game/tvshow/movie/book. they all turn out to be pretty good (other than a few gacha games)

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        There have been a few examples I can think of where they’ve called something woke and it was legit pretty mid or outright bad. But usually that’s down to it being a game by committee by people who only interact with marvel level writing, like Dragon Age: Veilguard which is just shit or Mass Effect: Andromeda which honestly just kinda mid.

      • ATS1312@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Its how I pick media these days too. Now that SFA is over, what are we watching?

        Please don’t make me get a Truth Social account to mine for our viewing list.

      • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Sometimes they’re accidentally right about something sucking, but always for a different reason than culture war BS. Ghostbusters 2016, for example.

        • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          i noticed that to, STD was one, the show sucked bad. they almost are selfaware, they said terrible writing but then said it is due to wokeness and having women in the show. SG1 was an oddball it got called woke/lib by both tankies and conservatives. right about lucifer in sandman being casted by gwendoline, shouldve been the way in mythology and comics. but comes up with wokeness as the reason.

        • dkppunk@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          I disagree, Ghostbusters: Answer the Call received way more hate than it deserved. I really enjoyed it and I have rewatched it a bunch of times, more than I’ve rewatched Ghostbusters 2. Holtzman is my favorite character and I love the goofy dance she does with Abby. And I love Chris Hemsworth’s character, he does big goofy handsome guy really well.

          It was way better than the last 2. I watched Afterlife once and I have no interest in watching Frozen Throne at all.

          • cygnathreadbare@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            My only issue with that movie was the timing of a few jokes (they made them longer than they should so they stopped being fun) and that the trailer spoiled half of the jokes. The movie itself is cool.

            The newest ones? their only redeeming quality for me is Egon’s granddaughter. The kid is really good. Everything else is just the dumbest nostalgia bait ever (even having the mom’s boyfriend a literal stand in for the kind of fan the movies pander to).

          • usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            I’m with you. 2016 may not compare to the original, but it was a solid comedy with a good heart. The bloody meltdown parts of the internet had over it was insane.

            • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              JP series with chris pratt is also bad, but i dont see conservative complaining about that, oh becauses the one as the lead, and not someone J Lawrence. i bet they love him even more now that he identifies as a far right christian.

        • RamenJunkie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          Yeah, that movie was so ass. My perfect summation of it. We rented it, my daughter picked it out. Like ten minutes in, she says something like, “This is so terrible, I am going to my room.”

          Now, normally, she will just ignore whayever is on and play on her phone or whatever and ignore it, this, she actively wanted to flee from.

          • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            It was actually impressive just how bad it was. It’s like they were trying to make it unbearable to watch. The fact that it carried the name of an all-time classic made it so much worse.

            • valkyre09@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              I was reading your comments thinking, it wasn’t that bad guys. One quick google search revealed I was thinking about the 2021 movie and had completely blocked all memory of the 2016 one. You’re spot on, it was atrocious!

        • TransNeko@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          don’t remind me of that abomination. that 2016 movie doesn’t exist. erase it from my memories.

      • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        99% of what you hear people like that accuse others of is pure protection. They’re telling you what they want to do without realizing it, so “woke agenda trying to brainwash our kids!” could be translated into “we want to brainwash kids toward our ideology.”

        • daggermoon@piefed.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          I remember a coworker saying something about trans people and how we can’t say anything anymore because it all has to be about them or something. I never got the impression this person was bigoted. It seemed completely out of character. I said something like (“They just want equal rights and the same respect as you and I. What’s the issue?”) Maybe people should worry more about weather or not their kids are learning the life skills they need to survive and less about weather or not their kids see two dudes kissing in a movie. Mom and dad need to untighten their buttholes. Even if I don’t understand something, I try to be empathetic and understanding to those who are different from me. I wish everyone else did.

    • Cossty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I recently learned that Shatner and Takei don’t actually use social media and all the posts you see from them are just some employees that were instructed to speak in their style.

      • cygnathreadbare@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I really dislike Takei’s one (Jay Kuo) because of how shamelessly he uses it to promote his own substack sometimes… and because of a specific substack post of his where he said “oh no it’s so bad Arizona got abortion banned… but there’s a silver lining, maybe they’ll learn to vote blue the next time” or some shit like that.

        +3M people losing their body autonomy and the first thing you think is “hey this can be a good thing for our campaign”?? fucking ghoul…

      • ValueSubtracted@startrek.websiteM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        45
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        I think Shatner is complicated because (a) he’s 95 years old, and can’t be expected to be fully “in touch,” and (b) he has definitely had some questionable people handling his social media over the years.

        • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          true, and he went with BEZOs into space as a tourist and became disappointed after, only for bezos to laugh for no reason after spraying him with ALCOHOL.

      • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Yeah, it’s shatner so you one expects him to be crass, and you one forgets he was the first star trek captain. and agreed with the ideas being shown on screen (unlike, IDK, Barclay’s actor)

  • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    The new trek was cancelled because some people hated it and had outsized influence.

    So thanks, those of us who liked it don’t get any more of what we liked because a few dicks had outsized influence.

    I don’t get to enjoy something because you didn’t like it. Thanks.

    You could have just not watched it, but instead you had to ruin it for me too.

    Fuck you. We all need to stop watching these fuckwits who think they know more than us. Unsubscribe from these channels. Stop watching them. They’re ruining our ability to watch things.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      academy? kurtzman ruined every trek he showrunned, if they dint figure it out with STD, SNW, AND picard they arnt going to with academy. they are running out of Ideas for a trek show. making the show only 10-12episodes per season hurts it as well.

    • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The new show was cancelled because not enough people watched it.

      “Outsized influence” my ass.

      Money talks. You think if the show hit the top ten in the streaming Nielsen stats that they’d cancel it because some people “didn’t like it”? Get real.

      People are allowed to like something. People are allowed to dislike something. If enough people like it, the show gets enough viewers to continue. If not. It doesn’t.

      People who don’t like it aren’t obligated to watch it just to prevent it from being cancelled for your sake.

    • Herr_S_aus_H@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 hours ago

      This is the one thing I will never understand. If you don’t like something just ignore it. If you think you are in the position that your opinion matters in any way you can declare why you don’t like something once and then move on. All those grifters and their brainless drones consume stuff they don’t like willingly and regularly. People who are of sound mind don’t do something like this.

    • homes@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      The show felt unfocused and confused. The characters, like the storylines, were kinda all over the place and didn’t really seem to know where they were going. Too much effort seemed to be put into the show’s set and setting, and not enough effort went into the things that went into the sets and settings. It had a lot of potential, but it all of it never really seemed to come together.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        It was the first season (and only 10 episodes in, at that, because TV production is stupid these days).

        Imagine if you could only judge, say, TNG on the first 10 episodes.

        • bthest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Yeah unfortunately nothing works like it did during TNG-era anymore. There’s no more syndication, no soft continuity resets, no time to try different things. Every season of a show has to be a 12 hour movie, with every episode integral to the last. You just can’t do that for more a handful of seasons before show runs out of steam dramatically. Shows have be in the groove from the start or they’re just going to be cancelled.

          It’s why I don’t even bother torrenting any series anymore. It’s a failure of the modern enshitified financified mega monopoly dystopia rather than the shows themselves though.

        • homes@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          On one hand, I would say that it was, by far, the worst first season of any Star Trek show so far. On the other hand, I don’t think it deserved to be canceled. Just heavily reworked, much like TNG after its first season.

          But Kurtzman has a pretty poor track record, and it’s just been getting worse and worse and worse. With the exception of Lower Decks, which was exceptionally awesome. seriously. That show was fucking amazing, and I really miss it.

          Academy has a great premise, and I actually really like all of the actors and the prototypical concepts for the characters, but the rendering of all of them is just a total mess. it’s hard to say what to do with all of them because, honestly, I hardly even know where to start. There’s just so much… I don’t even know where to start. It’s a lot. It’s like I have all of the ingredients for a really awesome Thanksgiving dinner, but someone put them all in a blender. And now I have to deconstruct the whole thing and start from scratch. Like, it’s all there, but someone makes it all up the wrong way. I don’t know.

          I didn’t know the show was canceled. That’s too bad. It deserved another chance. You could tell all of those actors were working really really hard, and they all had a lot of talent. Honestly? I think that they deserved a lot better.

        • Damage@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Imagine if you could only judge, say, TNG on the first 10 episodes.

          Still better, more original, with characters (and actors) on a WHOLE DIFFERENT LEVEL.

      • RamenJunkie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        They DESPERATELY needed more episodes. Like they had this whole War College thing (don’t get me started on the stupid name), and then suddenly it was just kind of gone.

        We got ten episodes, 4 were dedicated to.Caleb/Nus/Metaplot.

        Two were centered on SAM, one on Jay-Den, and like 1.5-2 on Tarima. Genesis and Darem basically shared 1.5 episodes.

        • homes@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          OK, so with modern TV production, that’s never gonna happen. What they need to do is find some way to transition the style of storytelling to 10 episodes per season. I honestly don’t know how they’re gonna do that, but they need to figure it out. And Alex Kitzman certainly doesn’t know how to do it. So they need it first of all get rid of his ass. He sucks his whole production team sucks.

          They also need to get rid of their visual effects team. I really am sick to death of this hyper realistic unreal presentation of this needle in your brain CGI graphics. I hate it so much.

          I really think they need to take a break for a little while and figure out how to adapt the 90s storytelling style to contemporaneous production style. Kurt‘s been tried and failed, and they need to go back to the drawing board and figure out how to do it again. And if the price we have to pay is waiting a few years before we get more Star Trek, I’m willing to make the sacrifice.

      • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 hours ago

        All new Trek series feel unfocused and confused in their first season. Watch the first season of TNG or DS9 and tell me it was tight. Every Trek is kind of a mess at first.

        • homes@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Well… yes, but not anywhere near as bad as this. This was like a bad GHB trip, crazy nightclub setting and all. For any new television show, there are at least a couple dozen foundational elements that set the overall direction of the show and where it’s going, but for this show, all of them were crazy haywire, pointing in a bunch of different directions none of them coordinated. For a normal TV show, when a few of them don’t really work out, they can be re-oriented or smooth out or whatever, but that is made easier because they’re all kind of heading in the same direction. With academy, none of them were ever heading in the same direction, none of them really knew what they wanted to be or what they were even about, or where they were going, so there’s no way to smooth them out or rework them, because any new version of them is still gonna be going in some random direction and wouldn’t know what they were going to be.

          If I were the one who was in control of all of this, the first thing I would do, besides firing Alex Kitzman, would be to reboot the show entirely. To make sure that, from the start, everything was coordinated and aligned, and everything was all heading in the same direction, and everything knew what it was, everyone knew what they were or at least where they were headed, and what they were eventually going to be, and we were all on the same page. That everything made some sort of sense, or at least would eventually makes sense, and that we were all on a journey to the same destination. Because, if anything was extremely obvious about this show, it was that nobody had any sort of destination in mind.

          Luck, I get what you’re trying to say. Star Trek is very famous for having terrible first seasons for their shows. But this one… This one was different. This first season be lied the fact that no one was thinking of the same thing. No one had any sort of central planning for where they were going. Everyone working on the show was thinking of something different, and there was never any possibility of it all coming together at the end, and we saw that because, at the end of the season, it really didn’t come together at all. At the end of the season, every character, every storyline, every different location, ended up somewhere completely on its own. And nothing really ended up, making any sense at all. And, for every other Star Trek show, during its first season, they were at least able to resolve it in one way or another. All the arcs came to a conclusion, all the storylines ended up in one place, and everything was resolved. But in this case? We were no better off than when we were in the beginning. Lost and confused.

  • saltesc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I wouldn’t say woke is against norms, rather against traditionalism. Traditionalism itself is often abnormal, even within its own culture.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    14 hours ago

    In the early iterations of the 1960s smash hit Star Trek, audiences were shocked and titillated to see a white male officer in a romantic relationship with a black woman officer.

    This continues to be shocking today, as modern audiences are not ready to see any (fully clothed) woman in any form of Sci-Fi media doing anything at all.

    • daggermoon@piefed.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I guess i’m in the minority of people who thought Janeway was the best starship captain as a kid. She’s badass and she drinks coffee.

      • Mannimarco@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I agree, I love Picard don’t get me wrong but Janeway was always my favourite, she kicks ass and is just fucking cool

        • UninvestedCuriosity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I really like Picard and Shran as favourites but I’d much rather work for Janeway. I really enjoyed the duality of her morals from Admiral Janeway breaking temporal directive to try to go back and save her crew at any cost. When I was younger I couldn’t understand how Admiral Janeway was so different but now that I’m older, I get it.

          How can you not enjoy watching Tom and Harry strike out every 4th episode with the mythical twins as well. Absolute cinema. Also Borg ship ablative armor was fire.

    • kbal@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      13 hours ago

      modern audiences are not ready to see any (fully clothed) woman in any form of Sci-Fi

      What? Pluribus was the biggest new Sci Fi TV show last year, was liked by critics and audiences, and won a bunch of awards.

    • usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Nah, he’s a good Canadian.

      Okay, he’s rich, out of touch, and a total dick to his coworkers. But I’ve never seen him express any particularly bad political views.

    • cygnathreadbare@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I think (but don’t remember specific instances) Shatner is conservative leaning but I guess the canadian perspective makes him very different to MAGA.

      You are probably thinking of Robert Beltran? he went open about MAGA shit on twitter shortly after jan 6 IIRC.

  • DataCrime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Startrek XXX… I had a different joke in mind but now I just want Startrek 10 the movie staring Vin Diesel 😎