• Slashme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    Plastic caps being attached to bottles has nothing to do with carbon footprint, it’s to reduce plastic waste in the environment.

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    SpaceX and Xai merger started with the complete fraud that datancenters in space are an economically viable proposition, when even in the US, solar and batteries on leased Nebraska farmland, is over 5x cheaper, even with most optimistic launch cost assumptions.

    Adding jump thrusters to cars is an unrealistic/impractical fraud to justify a spacex tesla merger.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s to pretend they’re actually doing something when people dropped deposits on the 2020 roadster in 2017.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      That ignores the part where data centers in space are just stupidly complicated to currently basically being impossible

      You have to start with little things like network latencies, but when you get to heat dissipation things just get stupid.

      Then again, stupid impossible is kinda Elmo’s modus operandi. Just claim you’ll do something stupid and or impossible, people will dance for you, then you just get billions to spend a fee years pretending that you’re actually doing it and then you, you know, just dont do it. Elmo musk in a nutshell. IH, that and Hitler babies, that too is his thing

  • diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Fun fact, the EVs normally have a set of fuses which blow when rolled over. These had to be removed for the demo.

    EDIT: someone else posted a photo of the demo car itself not even having the high voltage battery installed; in other terms it does not drive.

  • morto@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    I wish we could organize to ignore those idiotic product show-offs from billionaire’s playgrounds. No talking, no commenting, no sharing, living as if it ever happened. This would make those products be abandoned by investors and fade into the nothingness they deserve, along with their ego and all the invested money.

    One can dream…

      • Fallibilist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        It’s pretty clear the author here is misinformed and thought that those are rocket engines. Just like they were misinformed about why the caps are attached to the bottles.

        Them creating this cartoon and posting it online produced CO² as well. Nothing survives that purity test.

  • Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Why the fuck am I seeing bottle caps getting compared to some billionaire’s vanity project everywhere?

    • ominous ocelot@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      The direct connection escapes me, too.

      It would be more reasonable to compare a measure, that actually helps to reduce trash and co2 footprint with that flying car. Plus: there is no reason to stop it, just because there is one very rich, annoying guy.

      The effect of one toy project (look at me I build flying cars. Look at me!) isn’t that big. Like Kanemann said, people are poor intuitive statisticians.

    • blackbeans@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      5 days ago

      EU decision. All caps used in single use beverage containers (bottles etc). Around 100 billion bottles per year are used in the EU.

      The goal is not reduce the carbon footprint, but to reduce litter (loose caps ending in the environment).

      It is convenient if implemented well, and annoying if not.

    • bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      A big thing in Europe now. It might be limited in some areas based on whether the plastic of top and bottle need to be separated for recycling.

      • Strider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        It’s awesome. I love having a few drops of liquid in the cap and the cap being in my face while drinking, the drops on my face now.

        Also great for people with disabilities who can not hold things that good and caps sometimes snapping back can make a mess eg when pouring.

        Yes, while it sounds exaggerated I’ve had it all happen sometime. So I tear them off.

        • Jiral@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          Disabilities are a weak argument. Depending on which one, tethered caps can be either beneficial or not. In any case, they are relatively easy to tear off, by design. If you aren’t disabled they should be no challenge at all. Indeed I don’t know a single person who feels challenged by them, non of them have them in their face while drinking and I have no idea what drops you are facing either. Surface tension that keeps drops in a cap also keep it there while drinking.

          • Strider@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            I am and I have issues with it. So?

            I have neurological issues so motor skills don’t work as they should. I could lash back at presumptions but I am tiredly used to it. Also getting downvoted for speaking out.

            I also have sensory issues in public transport with the loud beeping on closing doors, which is the cheap way to help (partly) blind people.

            It already sucks to be disabled.but what sucks even more is people like you invalidating personal experienced issues because you have no idea.

            Deal with your own weak tolerance.

  • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    The Roadster FV uses cold gas thrusters, IE compressed air. There’s no carbon footprint apart from the energy used to run the compressor.

  • NachBarcelona@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    5 days ago

    Well yes, you get the golden cup of shit for the dumbest take on the subject, like, ever.

    ”Hitler committed genocide, so what’s eo bad about my little murder?“ - OP (allegedly)