• TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    366
    ·
    2 months ago

    Google getting rid of all the things that made people want an android phone over an iPhone.

      • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        58
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I mean, there is still UI/UX, app store policies, and general cost/options.

        This definitely makes Android a lot less appealing. But it is also questionable to act like the biggest reason to use android was sideloading apps since the vast majority of users don’t even know that is an option (and probably shouldn’t since they have no understanding of how to vet them). Especially since Apple isn’t any better (?).

          • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            So… “the ignorance of the masses” should be combatted by willful ignorance and nonsense that falls apart the moment anyone looks at it?

            Get angry. I sure am. Look for alternatives. Graphene sure ain’t it but I hope it will be in the next four or five years. But this is something google are willing to futz with for a reason: The vast majority of users don’t care about it and even with the changes it isn’t significantly worse than the competition.

            Yet everywhere I see “Well, I guess I have to buy Apple now” which is just… buy it if you want to but don’t pretend this shit is why.

        • emax_gomax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          Ui/ux is honestly worse on android compared to something like ios. The playstore is honestly stuffed with ads and seems to be actively regressing in ux (the update apps menu is hidden behind like 3 layers of dialogues). Cost wise a used iPhone is probably a better deal than a cheap new android phone.

          I used android primarily because I could install apps Apple basically doesn’t care about (and after the 5th time gba4ios broke).

          • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            2 months ago

            Maybe it’s because I’m used to android, but iOS feels user hostile in ways that android never has been, especially when it comes to storage management and pushing iCloud subscriptions.

            • emax_gomax@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Well android phones dont have removable sd card slots anymore, the only way to transfer files is over the weird protocol that’s slower than directly writing to disk, if you use pixel or Samsung youre already inundated with annoying ads. The ecosystem is pretty awful now. Installing a custom rom is a good idea, but depending youre phone model it could be a step down and if your on any Samsung phone with knox it basically irreparably damages some attestation fuse. Apple ain’t much better. I might try a Linux phone next.

              • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                2 months ago

                There is a lot wrong with android, but it’s super easy to transfer files over USB or just download them. I use Nextcloud personally. Then you can manipulate them with your choice of file manager.

                I got a new phone recently, Samsung with Knox, the worst part about it so far compared to other Android has been how it is quick to kill background apps, and the UI is honestly disorienting compared to how I’m used to doing things. I haven’t been shown ads yet, but I did go ahead and disable all the Samsung apps I could find. This includes not being able to control how quickly it kills background apps, but it’s the lesser of two evils.

                I’m not sure what Knox attestation is, but it sounds really unfortunate, and I want to search it now. I agree the phones of today are awful and the only reason I got this one was the price.

      • Chozo@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s still a step up from iOS, which has had similar restrictions since they started.

          • suigenerix@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            somewhat

            Yes. Only in the EU and only since 2024 when Apple was forced to do it by new laws. It’s reasonable to assume Google would be subject to the same laws.

            If you live outside if the EU, it’s “no sideload for you!” There are computer programs that can do sideloading to iPhones, but they have limitations, like having to refresh the sideloaded apps every seven days.

            • Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Wholly incorrect. You’re allowed to sideload up to 3 apps (or 10 appIDs, whichever comes first) without being a developer, and that arbitrary restriction is removed if you pay for a dev license, regardless of which part of the world you’re in.

              In the EU you’re allowed to install third party app stores (still have to be notarized by Apple) which isn’t sideloading

              • suigenerix@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                The limitations depend on which program you’re using - there’s more than one - which is why I only gave a simple example. And if you have to pay for a function that is otherwise free to many others, that’s a limitation.

                Side loading is installing an app from anywhere but the official store. So by definition “third party” is side loading. Whether it’s another store or authorised is irrelevant.

                • Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  The limitations depend on which program you’re using - there’s more than one - which is why I only gave a simple example.

                  No it doesn’t. It’s in all the documentation, official and otherwise

                  Side loading is installing an app from anywhere but the official store. So by definition “third party” is side loading. Whether it’s another store or authorised is irrelevant.

                  You can’t just make up a definition, believe it, and then share it like it’s true. We’re going by the legal definition as that’s the only one that matters.

                  Apple only allows up to 3 apps or 10 appIDs to be sideloaded, wherever you are in the world. Period.

        • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          “This ad company restricting anything you can load is better than iOS” is decently a thing you can say hahahaha

    • Bogasse@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      2 months ago

      Linux phones are moving fast but it feels like Android is moving faster on the other direction 😥

      (Yes I know Android is built over Linux, I mean more traditional and open distros like postmarketos)

      • favoredponcho@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 months ago

        Are they moving fast? It’s been like 18 years since the iPhone came out and there really isn’t a viable Linux phone.

        • Tja@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 months ago

          There was a viable Linux phone 15 years ago: Nokia N900. Microsoft took care of that when they bought Nokia. At least Windows phone was a resounding success…

        • Whitelisted@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Wasn’t the viable Linux phone Android at first? (I am younger than the iPhone so maybe I don’t really know how it was)

          • favoredponcho@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 months ago

            By Linux I mean “FOSS” phone. Android is based on Linux, but it is also loaded with spyware out of the box. If you’d asked me 18 years ago whether there would be a viable FOSS phone by now, I would’ve thought yes. But, postmarketOS still advertises itself as “not ready yet” and Ubuntu Touch is still pretty niche.

    • Fedditor385@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Unfortunately, that is 0.1% of their global market that is affected. So, they don’t really have much to lose.

    • Guidy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yup my first thought was “Where is your God now?”

      Google ditched “Don’t be evil” a long time ago.

  • xodoh74984@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    221
    ·
    2 months ago

    Remember that brief period in the US where, for a fleeting moment, Lina Khan went after a few companies for monopolistic practices?

    • generator@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      97
      ·
      2 months ago

      Right, only install “verified” from Google Play, but that is where malware is, other 3rd party app stores like F-Droid, that really verify apps are at risk of getting killed by Google

      • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        109
        ·
        2 months ago

        This is very obviously step one in a plan to kill apps like alternative YouTube clients that block ads, just like the Manifest V3 rollout was intended to kill ad blockers in Chrome. Once they have everyone using this verification system, then they can just arbitrarily deverify anything that contravenes whatever new acceptable usage policy they just made up.

    • ItsComplicated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      2 months ago

      Google can’t keep malware off the platform now, but sure, make it mandatory you can’t go anywhere else unless they say so first.

  • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    126
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Google says it’s no different than checking IDs at the airport.

    Fucker, if I own the airport, own the planes in the airport, am the only person using my own planes in my own airport, then nobody is asking for my ID.

    Our phone, our software choice.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Fucker, if I own the airport, own the planes in the airport, am the only person using my own planes in my own airport, then nobody is asking for my ID.

      Okay, but what if Google owns the airport, the planes, and thinks it’s entitled to own the people flying on them, to boot?

      Our phone, our software choice.

      You’ll Own Nothing And Be Happy

      • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        The minimalist in me would love that. But while I am paying for this shit, it’s mine to do what the hell I damn well please with it!

    • CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      There it is, haha.

      Gave me a good chuckle as i’m with you here.

      I have a similar sentiment when it comes to ads, my device, i pay for the internet and the device is inside my home. I’ll decide if you get to show me ads.

      • Fiery@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        For ads at least the argument can be made that the content you consume is not yours and as such you should not be allowed to choose how it is monetized.

        Google unilaterally deciding this is like Firefox or chrome adding ads to websites. Which is like no… They’re the medium through which content is consumed.

    • GreenBottles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Read the contracts you sign when you buy your phone and you’ll understand how wrong you are. The problem here is we have very little choices. Monopolies kill consumer choice.

      • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        Read the contracts you sign when you buy your phone

        Contracts? Unless I’m buying a subsidized phone where a mobile phone plan is required, I’m not sure what other contract I’d be signing. I never got one from Samsung, OnePlus, Google, any used marketplace, or Amazon.

        They get paid, and I get hardware to do what I like with it. If I can’t do what I want with it, then I’m renting, and I should be paying a rental fee, not a “full price”.

      • BCsven@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        I didn’t sign a contract. Also just flashed the Pixel to GrapheneOS, and bye bye google

    • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      There’s already a firm divide between the foss/self sufficiency crowd and modern tech.

      If this is bad enough, you’d see every foss faithful walking around with a laptop, mp3 player and camera like they’re in 2009.

      • Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I hardly believe foss faithful people would ever carry a laptop, but there is a chance they will choose a foss-respecting phone (not that there are many options)

        • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I hardly believe foss faithful people would ever carry a laptop

          The whole thinkpad obsession in the linux/foss community isn’t visible to you?

          • Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Carrying a laptop like it was a Steam Deck is pretty hard, nevermind like it was a phone, unless it’s like a Vaio or something.

    • Prove_your_argument@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      It was always intended to be this way.

      The beginning was pre-enshittification. We’re going from the good ole’ days to the future, and the future sure as shit aint for you unless you’re in the club… and you aint, none of us are.

    • Zarathustra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I don’t like how tech is evolving…

      Yeah, I’m not sure I like how the axe in my hand is evolving. It seems to be going for the internet fiber.

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      You will be able sideload but the developer has to be authorized by Google. I.e. you can still install apps from f-droid but people publishing apps on f-droid will have to register with Google.

      • kolorafa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I dont have an issue with a feature to allow my phone to automatically veirfy signatures. But there should be a way to import/configure more signature verification providers including my own authority and even then it should still allow imstall if user really want and trust it.

        • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 months ago

          Of course, the real issue is that it requires developers to sing up into Google’s ecosystem to distribute any apps. The entire ecosystem of mods and alternative stores will be fine but it’s just another proof Google is trying to kill it.

      • Amju Wolf@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        This might be an issue because f-droid re-signs apps with their own keys…

        I mean depends on enforcement I guess.

    • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Dumbphone with tethering

      A mini laptop/cyberdeck

      A modern mp3 player

      A small, modern point and click camera

      hey gramps, where’d you get that gear, 2007?

        • GraniteM@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I had an Asus Eee PC and I fuckin’ loved it. Is there anyone still making a functional laptop in that form factor anymore?

          • Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I don’t know, but if you find one, let me know. Because if Asus made a new one under their ROG branding, I think I’d be willing to pay the extra cost.

    • themadcodger@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ll probably go with one of the other roms on an older phone or possibly one of the Linux phones. It won’t be exactly what I want, but it’ll be better than their walled garden bullshit. That’s precisely why I left Apple way back when.

      • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Or we just… ignore them?

        LineageOS and GrapheneOS could just be like “well, go on, then.”

        There’s a market for everything and the FOSS and maker markets would eat up an open Android phone, even if the only apps you could install were community-created.

  • tomenzgg@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m probably going to spam this around a bit, since most people don’t seem to know about it, but a reminder that FuriLabs has a (GNU+)Linux phone with decent spec.s and the ability to run Android app.s (from what I’ve heard) pretty decently: https://furilabs.com/

    Biggest drawback is it’s based on Halium. Usual growing pains of a new product/company apply but apparently the company is pretty responsive and their dev.s have worked with customers to get things like calling working with the carrier and bands of their country where it hasn’t worked before so improvements move pretty quickly.

    Collection of different experiences I’ve variously seen online over the last year or so:

    I don’t own one, myself, so I can’t give any personal experience but I’ve seen it around for a few years now but most people don’t seem to even know about it. Maybe there’s a reason for that? But none I’ve ever seen anyone say.

    • GorGor@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      2 months ago

      HOLY SHIT IS THAT A HEADPHONE JACK?!

      Seriously this ticks boxes Ive given up on. I never thought Id see a phone with all three: waterproof, removable battery, headphone jack. It even has wireless charging which isnt really one of my boxes but is a little extra if you use it.

      • tomenzgg@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah; that’s totally fair. Mostly, I just want to get it more known; whenever Mobile Linux come up, people namedrop Purism, the Pinephone, maybe UBPorts and the general conclusion is that the spec.s, alone, of what’s available are pretty much a non-starter.

        There’s definitely aspects of this phone that some people wouldn’t go for but I’d rather sales be limited by not-the-right-choice than just no one knew it existed; especially when any progress can get sent upstream and improve future projects, as well.

        • Spaniard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I didnt care so much about bulky before but now I have wrist issues and I can’t handle heavy phones (and I am in a LDR for a few months more so the phone is used heavily!)

    • ArchEngel@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Wow, thanks for this comment, I think I may have finally found my next phone! I did not expect Linux with android, wireless charging, NFC, and hopefully one day display out. Thanks for commenting!

  • roofuskit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    2 months ago

    Oof, time to bite the bullet and switch email providers. Shit like this is why I’ve spent the last couple years de-googling my life.

    • themadcodger@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 months ago

      Do it! It’s not that bad. Everyone’s got different needs, but I switched to fastmail and have been enjoying it.

      • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 months ago

        If you’re making the switch anyway, get yourself a domain name from a separate company to run it through. That way in the future you can keep using your domain even if you switch mail/web-hosting providers.

        • themadcodger@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I have a domain and an email address through it, but my problem is I can’t find a domain name I like enough to both keep and give out to others as a long term contact point. The one I have right now is silly, and not easy to communicate over the phone.

          It’s a me problem, but if I ever figure out something I’m will to keep and is available, that’s the goal.

        • a1studmuffin@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Two minor concerns about this approach:

          1. Will the lesser known domain name make your emails more likely to be filtered as spam? I don’t know the answer, but I am fairly sure it wouldn’t help.

          2. Will having your email routed through a middleman open up security issues? Probably solveable with diligence and awareness, but I recently had a non-technical friend with this setup get his Gmail breached because he was forwarding it to an email inbox on his personal domain from decades earlier that he forgot about, and didn’t have 2FA on the domain webmail. IMHO an easy oversight for anyone, honestly.

          • xthexder@l.sw0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 months ago
            1. The domain name has no effect on spam filters, it’s all about which server is sending it and if the domain is properly configured with MX records, DKIM signing keys, etc… A custom domain with mail sent from a major mail provider won’t get sent to spam any more than a new gmail account.
            2. Mailboxes for a custom domain work exactly the same as any other email. There is no forwarding to another mailbox or provider unless you configure it to be that way. You should be pretty careful with what settings the mail server is configured with though, because encryption is optional…
  • katy ✨@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    2 months ago

    so basically i have to send in my id to google just to sideload a test apk i made in flutter to my own phone to test it out?

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 months ago

      Ad it’s just another data point for corporations and governments to be able to tie all your tech activities to your real identity. Great for surveillance!

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        and if it will work like the play store, you will need to upload an apk* and download the signed version, so it’s not even immediately obvious if they changed anything.

        * not really an apk but an intermediate build product

  • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Two things especially worth noting from the article.

    If you have a non-Google build of Android on your phone, none of this applies.

    This means that at least GrapheneOS will be unaffected for now. Other ROMs without gapps will be unaffected only as long as you don’t install gapps. Since Graphene has a sandbox for them, I’m assuming it’ll be fine. That is, unless Google decides to lock the bootloader entirely.

    In September 2026, Google plans to launch this feature in Brazil, Indonesia, Singapore, and Thailand. The next step is still hazy, but Google is targeting 2027 to expand the verification requirements globally.

    So most users worldwide still have at least 1.5 years until it’s implemented. Plenty of time to get a Pixel and install Graphene on it. Or to figure out some other plan.

    Don’t get me wrong - this is insane, unreasonable and horrible news for everyone. We should push back as hard as physically possible against it. However, at the very least we still have some time to figure things out before the policy rolls out.

    • lmuel@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      I wouldn’t be surprised if Google stop allowing BL unlocking soon… Following Samsung and Xiaomi (although Xiaomi technically can be unlocked, in reality you’ll not be able to do so nowadays unless you pay someone to do it via remote USB shit for you)

    • eleitl@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Imagine the custom ROM situation was as bad for phones as it currently is for tablets. There is just one supported tablet which is new.

  • MSids@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The Android ecosystem has been feeling more like an invasive chaotic advertisement machine the past few years. The play store is a cesspool, the weather app switch was poorly executed, Google Podcasts went to the graveyard, and Google pay getting shut down meant I had to switch back to vomits Venmo.

    I still have Android gaming handhelds, but why wouldn’t I just get an iPhone the next time I go to replace my phone? I can’t believe I’m even saying that after being so die hard Android so for years.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah that’s what I’m thinking too. Android’s only advantage over the Apple ecosystem is being able to install apps. If that goes away there’s no reason for me to stay.

    • cley_faye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      They also managed to remove a feature from the fucking clock app. It’s not much, but seriously, it’s like a headless chicken running toward a cliff from the business end.

    • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Google pay being shut down is news to me. I still pay contactless with Google pay and also for paying on websites…

      • jpeps@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Google Pay is different in America, right? To me it’s just contactless.

      • MSids@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Sorry I should have clarified. Google pay moved the payment features to Google wallet, but the biggest loss was the person-to-person payments are now gone. I never understood why they had multiple apps that did the same thing. I seem to also remember a time where there was a Google pay and gpay app that lived side by side, so there were a total of three apps when there should have been one.

  • woland@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    2 months ago

    Great. This could be just the boost that free android needs. Graphene and eos can brace for a few new customers i guess

    • RheumatoidArthritis@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Graphene developers seem enthusiastic to all the bullshit that Google comes up with, and on security/privacy tradeoff they seem to usually choose security. Case in point, the mandatory battery update.

      CalyxOS seems to choose privacy first, but that project folded recently.

    • halfsak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ve been using graphene for a few months, but this latest news was what reminded me to start a monthly donation to the project. Hopefully Googles shenanigans push more people towards funding alternatives as well

      • Glitchvid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I’ve gotta get a new phone soon (ol Pixel 3 is getting long in the tooth) and this is what I’m looking at too. I highly prefer the “default” Android UI, and the ability to install programs of my own choosing — but fuck Google, imagine getting locked out of your phone just because Google randomly unpersoned you.

        • woland@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Good luck and wisdom in choosing. I picked a fairphone and went for /e/os. No reason to regret that yet. Just does what it says on the tin

  • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    I honestly wish for the responsible people to die. A natural, painless death, but let it be quick. All of silicon valley is so evil it would be deemed unrealistic for a movie villain. They are selling out our freedoms and planet for what? They are already stinking rich.

  • MisterD@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    2 months ago

    FYI: Apple got sued for blocking other app stores. This would prevent f-droid from being installable

      • JustARaccoon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’d be up to Google to do so, and they probably will just as an example of them totally not being a monopoly “look we even allowed a competing store”.