• 191 Posts
  • 10.9K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle





  • If a game does the best in multiple categories should it be skipped over just to highlight another game?

    It’s all subjective. If you make Balatro and I make BG3, there’s no objective way to evaluate “Best Game” between the two. You’ve got to make some subjective judgement (or just put your hand out and collect bribes).

    Giving one of them a full stack of awards doesn’t signal quality, it signals bias.

    If an indie studio’s first game wins best indie game how can it not also be the best debut indie game

    E33 wasn’t the studio’s first game. So it shouldn’t be winning the “award for debut games” on the ground alone.

    But yes, if you’re winning the “indie game” (which E33’s budget shouldn’t have qualified it for anyway) spotlight another game under “debut” even if you’re predisposed to favor turn based RPGs over platformers or puzzle games or simulators. In fact, especially then.

    This isn’t just recognizing the game, it’s recognizing the actors.

    It’s recognizing the budget more often than not.














  • I don’t think e33 is unreasonable.

    For any individual award, sure. It’s an arbitrary decision of taste and people can agree to disagree.

    When you’re stacking up all the awards on a single game, you’re effectively ignoring the rest of the releases for the year.

    The only issue I have is sandfall shouldn’t count as an independent game

    I’m more disgusted with giving “Best Indie” and “Best Debut Indie” to the same title. Why even have two categories at this point? It isn’t even the studio’s debut title.

    Similarly, three “Best Performance” nominees to the same title. You know what you’re doing and it’s not evaluation or recognition, it’s just promotion.

    But then these awards gave Pretty Derby the Best Mobile Game and FFT: Ivalice Chronicles (a thirty year old remaster!) Best Strategy, so whatchagonna do?

    Game awards have always been glorified ads.



  • I wouldn’t call it a distraction, because there’s nothing material it’s distracting from. It’s a scandal in the same way the Clinton BJ was a scandal. And it’ll have some downstream ramifications (very hard to run as the Anti-Pedophile party this time around) that’ll demoralize base activists when the economy is sliding and people are looking for an excuse to be angry.

    But if we weren’t watching Epstein, we’d still be watching something. It’s not like there’s a BLM or Occupy or Anti-War movement to latch on to. And even if there was… they were hollowed out lightning quick, leaving us with a bunch of Libertarians in flesh suits chanting “End The Fed”.

    Folks, he’s a pedophile and so many others of power and influence are and there’s nothing you can do about it.

    Nothing most people are willing to try to do about it.

    But every now and then, a brave man with a doohickey reminds Shinzo Abe of the price of hubris.