• 0 Posts
  • 58 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: January 4th, 2024

help-circle
  • It’s a good option to have, imo. People will try to commit suicide, even without this.

    They’ll fail and become a larger burden to society in a lot of cases. Or run up medical bills and exist miserably.

    With this method, folks who are interested have to clear a hurdle beyond their own emotions and survival instincts.

    If they’re committed to the act, this ensures a dignified end vs many terminal conditions.

    Suffering near end of life can be horribly tortuous. The ability to end the suffering on your terms with dignity is a benefit to society and those suffering.

    Do you feel hospice care is a bad thing? It’s one step removed from assisted suicide in many ways.

    In hospice care they often give you enough drugs to end it quickly, and instruct the caregivers to NOT call emergency services.

    We’re all going to die, at least we can make it somewhat civil.








  • No, that undecided group does not exist, this election clearly demonstrated that.

    That’s what you wrote. You are backtracking on that statement now?

    We know that ~16 million people didn’t vote this time vs 2020. We know that around 60% of all possible voters participated in 2020. We don’t know what that ~50-60% in (2024) actually want because they couldn’t be convinced to decide. That is the definition of undecided. That is literally ~50% of registered voting people who left the choice undecided. A group you claim to be non-existent.

    If they wanted to protest vote, they should and could have en masse voted for ‘Gaza Freedom’ or ‘No Fascism’ or any coordinated name as a write-in.

    Several parties suggested it during their primaries. I can’t find evidence of it occurring in those primaries.

    At least 12 states have no registration requirement for their write-in votes on final elections. Most don’t require it on primaries.

    That didn’t happen or wasn’t reported. The evidence suggests the former.

    I’d be more accepting of your claim if the facts actually supported your narrative.

    The numbers show that only about 60% of people who can vote actually decided.

    40% didn’t decide even after considering.

    Beyond that there’s still 40% of the population who didn’t even decide to consider voting.

    Which group of undecided voting eligible citizens do you claim as non-existent?

    You didn’t say exactly what I said.

    Your initial statement was in disagreement with the statement regarding undecided voters.


  • Apologies, I didn’t figure the math right. ~16 million.

    I disagree.

    Your first statement was that an undecided voter group didn’t exist.

    That’s what I’m responding to.

    Undecided did exist as ~16 million fewer votes were cast. Those could be protest votes could be voter roll purges…

    We don’t know what they’ve decided because they didn’t decide in a way that is counted.

    That is all.

    They can claim whatever reason they want. They abdicated their voices this time. Hope they’re able to use them again.


  • I’m sure your protest vote will be heard by Trump and the senseless murder.

    Y’all literally are like I don’t care the other guy wants to expel all Muslims (& anyone they don’t like) from the country and accelerate the genocide - she’s not breaking the law to stop another country who’s committing murder on the taxpayer dollar.

    She’s not screaming exactly what I want to hear. I believe the president controls the whole world.

    Therefore I choose to accelerate the genocide from someone who wants muslims and people associated with that skin color out of the country, because what matters to me is how quickly the yahoos finish the job.

    That’s your argument right now.

    Weave harder, you’re almost convincing folks you actually understand and aren’t in favor of Gazan eradication.


  • Your cake day, aka account origination date, is very recent. You claim you warned folks. You haven’t been around on here long enough to do that at all.

    Nice contradictory paragraphs. I only engaged with you to determine which flag you’re waving. It’s clearly been the one I called you on to begin with.

    Paraphrasing you for anyone who doesn’t want to read a bunch of half recalled (mis)information:

    I won’t do any homework to discuss my point. Believe me bro, because I totally said so.

    Do your homework to figure out what my weave actually means. I’m not backing up any of my allegations with facts, I don’t believe it’s worth the time. I told you to do something.






  • I agree, optics matter to the public and media.

    The media has sane washed an insane old person, while negatively spinning or outright ignoring any Biden accomplishment.

    The fact is, in this system, we’re trying to convince a small group of undecided folks in a few swing states to get involved and make a choice.

    The majority of the public is too tired and busy to bother to review the facts, and happy to watch an opinion of the matter - whether it’s true or not.

    If it fits into their world-view there’s no need to challenge it.


  • I’m partially agreeing, I want to point out that they did get 7 days allotted.

    Not all 7 of those are from sick time, so you’ve got a point.

    I find it a reach to say the administration gets no credit when it’s definitely been assigned to them on multiple fronts for the effort.

    Congress was involved here too. Do you think our president should be a despot?

    Were you directly involved in negotiations?

    The people who were directly involved, gave the Biden administration credit for an assist.