• curmudge_john@lazysoci.al
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    We know that Teslas sometimes just catch fire on their own.

    We also know that sometimes Tesla drivers will set their cars on fire themselves on purpose. Because of that…

    We also know that Elon has a backdoor into all Teslas.

    Now ask yourself which is more likely, the woke liberal crybabies actually causing violence or a drug addled and politically embattled CEO of a company that lost 50% of its value in the past 3 months creating a false flag to villainize the left and get insurance to cover damage to the vehicles he can’t sell?

    /s (kind of)

  • rational_lib@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Don’t destroy Tesla cars, destroy the brand. Destroying Teslas means there’s fewer Teslas and that makes them more valuable/reduces the flooding of the market caused by people selling their cars. The goal is to annihilate Elon’s purchasing power to stop him from using it to implementing fascist governments around the world.

    • potatopotato@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      4 hours ago

      In fairness, I think the possibility that someone might light your car on fire is a stronger incentive to not buy a brand than internet posts making fun of the brand. It also means now they have to beef up security at all of the dealerships. Car sales are surprisingly impulse driven, hence the famous high pressure sales tactics, so it’ll be harder to get people in the door if they’re strip searching everyone and if they can’t have as much inventory on the lot, customers can’t drive home with the options they want so less impulse buying. Also full coverage insurance, required for financing, will get more expensive or even impossible to obtain which possibly means a massively decreased customer pool.

      I think a better counter argument is the environmental damage caused by lighting all the cancer boxes on fire.

  • dmention7@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Man, if I had the poor luck/foresight to have purchased a Tesla earlier, I would be driving like the politest mofo in existence these days.

  • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    159
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    In posts on X following the incident, Tesla CEO Elon Musk called the incidents “terrorism” and said the company “just makes electric cars and has done nothing to deserve these evil attacks.”

    OK buddy.

    • ragingdachshund@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      58 minutes ago

      It’s not terrorism. They were just peacefully touring the dealerships. Just like January 6. Peacefully touring.

    • samus12345@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      The cars suck, but he’s right that the company hasn’t done anything to deserve this. He’s the one who chose to make himself the face of Tesla, though, so however people feel about him, they’ll feel about any business he owns.

      Terrorism, though? Hardly. It’s protest. He’s the one doing terrorism by dismantling the government.

        • ch00f@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          9 hours ago

          They just paid fucking 60 billion dollars to him to keep him from quitting. Maybe a smidge of sunk cost fallacy.

          • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Good. Let them drown with their sinking ship. They enabled his power grab in the first place and decided something as perverted and absurd as granting a single man $60 billion. Let this be a lesson in history books.

            • baggachipz@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              23 minutes ago

              If trump had lost the election, he would be in jail and Elon would have been destroyed. Instead, we got… this.

      • pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Even if they do, protests and boycotts need to continue past it. A lot of his wealth is in Tesla stock, and he’s going to benefit from the shadows if the public moves on and TSLA recovers.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I have never, and will never, see anyone vandalize a Tesla. 🙈

  • Beej Jorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I have zero evidence Musk ordered the Tesla vandalism. Which, coincidentally, is exactly how surprised I’d be to find out he had.

    • samus12345@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I’d be surprised if he did. He sees Teslas as an extension of himself. Which is why it’s so very effective at upsetting him whenever people do stuff like this.

  • ugtug@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Tesla just likes building things that spontaneously catch on fire. 🤷‍♂️

  • the803@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    “Resist” is a tired slogan of the paid-to-lose Democrats, and the last time I saw it surface as “angry-Leftist vandalism” in pluto-fash corporate media propaganda, it turned out to be a Republican trying to cover up insurance fraud. They are too incurious to understand the difference between antifa and liberals.

    Kool-aid-drinking Tesla dealers are losing their shirts because Glorious Leader locked them into bad contracts and is now poisoning the brand; they have AMPLE incentive to destroy their own property and play victim.

    • Botzo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      10 hours ago

      As a reminder, Tesla is “direct to consumer” and the “dealership” is corporate owned!

      So when the party of conspiracy theorists claims conspiracy against them, you can rest assured it’s a conspiracy by them.

      But that’s what they’d say if the the tables were turned, so fuck 'em and their shit. I hope the insurance adjuster finds a way out and leaves them holding the bag.

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        As a reminder, Tesla is “direct to consumer” and the “dealership” is corporate owned!

        Gasoline powered vehicles have to be sold through dealerships, but of course Musk doesn’t like to follow the law and nobody stops him. Just like how ‘ride shares’ pretended to be sharing rides but were just cabs with extra steps.

        • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          What…? Lots of vehicles are sold online without dealerships, where’s this an actual rule, let alone a law?

        • roofuskit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          The laws are by state. You cannot buy a Tesla at a dealership in states where the law forbids it. They sell them online only in those states. That’s what happens when states don’t update laws.