

The implication is that it’s guaranteed to pass with her vote. That is the clickbait.


The implication is that it’s guaranteed to pass with her vote. That is the clickbait.


Not even Schumer is stupid enough to cave to “I lose my job forever.”


Doesn’t even take that much. Most can be bought with a couple thousand.


That was Uber’s attempt at self driving after they had to give up the stolen Waymo data. Waymo is probably the best at self driving, but even they spend too much time blocking traffic when they can’t reach the Indian call center to fix the situation they’ve gotten themselves in.
Many of them are just a key to download the game.
Turns out they thought it was a good idea after all.


They’re trying to force it to happen. They somehow think they’ll be spared and only the people they hate will have to suffer.


Wow. I never knew it was possible to be this wrong. Thank you for this unique experience.
First of all, it was defund not abolish. The point was to reduce the workload of the police to just dealing with criminal activity and not have them dealing with stuff better suited to others like medical professionals or counselors.
Man, it was so sad how many people took that seriously.
Right. More than 0% would be nice, though.
Unless the entire ad is AI, most of that stuff will already be paid for the rest of the shoot. So you’re really just paying the extra for the day to add that scene.


That story feels like someone was enraged by ‘The Tortoise and the Hare’ while writing it.

I’m pretty sure it’s exactly the gotcha he thinks it is.
That timespan is only calculating current usage. If we scale up to using it to completely replace fossil fuel usage, we would cut that time several orders of magnitude.
That’s why they’re hyping the repairability.


Some of the cities here, you would have to raze them to the bedrock and start from scratch to get a bike friendly, walkable city.


They also break more easily, which is a big boon to selling more expensive cars that break even easier.
She also never got all that money. The original judge reduced it then she settled for even less after McDonalds made it clear they would tie it up in endless appeals.
You think that point is inherently consenting? That is not true at all.