• flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 minutes ago

    And a surprisingly (depressingly) large number of law and order preaching conservatives are supportive of him doing it, despite him not being allowed to do that literally being written into the highest legal document in the country.

    • Soggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      52 minutes ago

      I didn’t vote for him, but I was pretty sure that his plan was to hire people to do everything semi-competently so that he could focus on fucking around and enriching himself. That was a very disappointing thing to be wrong about.

    • TimmyDeanSausage @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Believe it or not, there was actually a small coalition of just a few hundred million people screaming this from their rooftops around the world. If only the maga crowd could’ve heard their message sooner… Surely, well presented fact-based arguments would’ve changed their minds

      • III@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        45 minutes ago

        They heard it. They also know that because you don’t agree with them on everything that you are a dirty liberal, and thus everything you say is a lie and you should be in jail.

        • monotremata@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 minutes ago

          And they knew that only a despot would be willing to actually put political opponents in jail, so they voted for one. But then he turned out to be some kind of despot!

        • smeenz@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 minutes ago

          I suspect there is a great deal of crossover between maga supporters and flat earthers

    • Hogrider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I do believe his mother said something of the sort. That he should in no way ever enter politics

  • Konala Koala@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    35 minutes ago

    While reality again invokes claim he has the ‘right’ to remain silent because anything he says can and will be used against him in a federal court of law. He has the right to a dipshit attorney, but if he cannot afford one or if all of them refuse to represent a despot, one democratic one will be appointed to him to make sure he goes to federal prison.

  • Destide@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Impossible it was just a joke last year. You think he would do that setup a horrific violation of Western freedoms as a joke so no one takes it seriously then just full send it?

  • Nonprophet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    6 hours ago

    In the third term, he’s gonna lower the price of gas and groceries & end the wars in Ukraine/Iran. Day 1. Bigly.

      • TimmyDeanSausage @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        If we understand “now” as less of a time stamp, and more of a constantly shifting, meaningless word, it all makes sense.

        I heard the new healthcare plan is dropping two weeks from “now”! And the Iran war and the genocide in Gaza will end two weeks from “now”! Oh, and Venezuela will be up and running with their new for-US-profit systems two weeks from “now” so we won’t have to steal their resources ourselves! Go Trump go!

      • SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It’s a bigly plan, the most beautiful plan. You can’t see it, but many people are saying it’s the greatest perfect plan ever.

        • cloudshouter@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          At this point I would vote democratic just to have a president who can speak well. We had a chuckle at the Bushification of the language but 14+ years of it getting worse is just tiresome.

  • Greyghoster@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    With his mental decline it is unlikely that he will be in any shape to overturn the constitution and mount a campaign. Then stranger things have happened.

  • trolleyfuckergirl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Honestly, I support it. It’ll be like the election of 1912 where Roosevelt and Taft split the Republican vote enough that the Democrat Wilson was elected.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      How about January 7th 2021 trump gets arrested and executed for sedition? Oh, is this a purity test to far for the democratic party?

      Democrats are the cops at Uvalde. Keeping other people from going in and stopping the shooting (complicit alongside the republicans for perpetuating First-past-the-post voting, keeping others from competing against the republicans in the electoral system), yet doing nothing themselves.

      Sure blue maga, blame those with no representation in government. Whatever makes you sleep at night.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      They should, eya. Just like they should have kept him off in 2024, since he was already ineligible as an insurrectionist.

      but only a handful of states actually tried. funny how that worked.

      • Colonel_Panic_@eviltoast.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I’ve been screaming that for years. He shouldn’t even be president NOW!! He is an illegal and illegitimate president. He violated the constitution and our laws and was never cleared of those crimes and yet holds public office. But hey, he also violates every other law or rule we have so no biggie, right?

  • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    136
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice

    Those are the exact words of the 22nd amendment. It’s explicit. There’s no ambiguity or room for other interpretations. Trump was elected twice, he’s hit his limit, that’s it.

    • Colonel_Panic_@eviltoast.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Sure, but we didn’t enforce the 14th amendment section 3, which clearly states that he shouldn’t be president currently.

      No one enforced our laws, so we have NO LAWS.

      Which means, he can just run for president again and if no one enforced the law then it could happen again.

      I agree with you on the law, but NO ONE IS ENFORCING ANY LAWS LATELY!!! So what the fuck does any of it even matter anymore? Hmm?

    • FrChazzz@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Unless those rumors are true and they did manage to game enough voting machines to clinch the election. In which case he was not actually elected twice…

      • Master@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Its not the general votes that matter. Its the electoral college. So even if they cheated he was still elected twice.

      • Kenny4tunes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        “Sorry everyone, I used my hall-pass to get re-elected so it didn’t count… wah, I wanna be Mr.President again! Gimme, gimmie, gimmie”

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        52
        ·
        20 hours ago

        …and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.

        • leadore@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          17 hours ago

          And that’s why Vance and the other fascists are waiting until after the midterms to get rid of trump.

      • Zahille7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        20 hours ago

        There better be a real fucking riots in the streets across the entire damn nation if they come out with this bullshit.

        Like I mean burning down federal buildings and police stations, storming the homegrown concentration camps to free the prisoners, a literal million+ person march on Washington DC right to the front door of the White House.

          • Taldan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            How exactly do you guys think riots would go?

            Do you think Trump would just say, “guess they don’t like me, I’ll leave office”?

            Or do you think he would brutally crack down on everyone against him?

            Riots would be the casus belli he wants to take military control of the country

            • Stormy@thelemmy.club
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              27 minutes ago

              Idk man. They did fly the army apache over them last time there was a big protest in Tennessee and then that time they did that weird stuff with firing the missiles in Cali. You’re right, but something has to change, I think we’re supposed to be brave and strong and united instead of shocked daily and then retreating, frightened, back under a rock to safety.

        • GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Like the riots when an insurrectionist was allowed to run for a second term after being ruled ineligible by a State?

          • obvs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            17 hours ago

            But the Roberts Court, dontchaknow, intervened and went directly against the Constitution and made a BLATANTLY unconstitutional ruling that should have invalidated literally all of their appointments.

            Trump was ineligible for the second term, whether or not the Roberts Court wanted to acknowledge it.

            And hell will freeze over before I give those judges on the Roberts Court the dignity of referring to them with the words that other people call them or that court.

        • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          Sounds like the foundation of our Democracy was built on quick sand, and the cement poured by the shadiest cheapest contractor capitalism could buy.

    • benderbeerman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      16 hours ago

      No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice

      This is why is fun to own a whole ass supreme court:

      No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice

      Words are fun for this guy

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        20 hours ago

        It does specify that he has to be a person. Perhaps they’re going to argue he isn’t?

        • krashmo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          18 hours ago

          In a wild turn of events, he’s gonna change his name to Deborah and run as our first trans President, claiming the transition resulted in him being a different person.

    • ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      18 hours ago

      The one weasel notion that I wonder about, what if he was elected VP and the president stepped down directly after? Then he wasn’t elected a 3rd time but placed by successions. It wouldn’t surprise me to see them try some such fuckary.

      • wittymcusername@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I don’t remember the exact wording, but basically to be eligible to be VP one must meet the eligibility requirements for being President. So he’s not eligible to be VP either.

        But I recall someone claiming that no such eligibility requirement exists for Speaker of the House, who is in the succession line after the VP.

    • Sumocat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Yes, and none of that prohibits him from running for office again. The only prohibition is that he cannot be elected a third time. But here’s the thing: we don’t actually vote for President; we vote for who our Electors elect as President, and they are Constitutionally prohibited from electing Trump to a third term. If Trump runs and “wins”, the Electors cannot elect him. He can win 0 Electoral votes. Doesn’t matter what their States’ laws require because the Constitution is the highest law in the land… until SCOTUS rules the 22nd Amendment violates the 10th Amendment. 🤷🏻‍♂️

    • GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      19 hours ago

      It doesn’t matter what it says when neither courts nor law enforcement will enforce it. Looks like we’re running out of democracy boxes.

    • boatswain@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      So it sounds like there’s no prohibition against running, just against winning? Sounds like an easy win for the Dems.

      • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        20 hours ago

        It seems pointless to run in an election you are constitutionally barred from winning. But, Trump has proven time and time again he will do pointless things. If he tried running again and somehow he won, however, the constitution is clear: it’s a no go. He can’t get elected for a third time. That said, I don’t think that’s necessarily the point. I think the point is to create chaos and crisis. Hopefully he’s not around to run in 2028 so it becomes a moot.

    • neidu4@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Well, he can run again. It’s just moot, as he can’t be elected. If he were to get the most electoral votes, I gu3ss the runner up is elected?

    • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      There’s wiggle room, he’s claiming a right to campaign. To run… He’s not saying anything about being elected.

      He doesn’t actually do the electing. That’s up to public, and the officials who are in charge of elections (who he’ll try to stack with loyalists). He can’t say what they’ll do.

      He runs, and if others elect him… Well… That’s the wiggle room.

      • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        That’s not wiggle room, it’s violating the Constitution. Not saying it can’t happen, but it’s not like that’s a logic loophole, it’s just not caring about acting illegally.