Say someone else takes the visual result of the font’s output and re-posts it as plain text.

If anyone searches for that text, their version will come up as the first (and only) published version. Anyone who tries to reference it will cite their version instead of yours. You’d have to convince the court that a clearly different text you published earlier is really the same thing, as long as you view it with a special font that magically transforms it into the text you’re trying to claim—the judge would just as likely think you’re a copyright troll.

If the underlying text says one thing but the font makes it appear to say something else, which version does the author own the copyright to?

The plan was never to target criminals, it was to criminalize the targeted.

How does he envisage surface-to-air missiles being used against him by current allies? Defending Greenland from a US invasion?

I agree with the goal… but while I think a competitive primary leads to better outcomes, too many candidates leads to arbitrary outcomes that depend more on which factions have the lowest candidate-to-voter ratio instead of which have the most actual voters (at least the way it’s currently structured). Plus it increases the chances of a brokered convention, which leads to voters feeling disenfranchised no matter who wins.

IMHO whats important in 2028 is we have a big field in the primaries so we can see where the base is then.

I agree in principle, but the Democrats had a historically big field in 2020 and ended up with Biden. Sanders could arguably have won if Warren had pulled out earlier (reducing the number of candidates).

What would Schumer get from that? I can’t see him throwing away whatever’s left of his career just to help a Californian get the presidential nomination instead of another New Yorker.

Why would AOC need to cut a deal to win Schumer’s seat? What other potential Senate candidate could defeat her, but would stay out of the race for Newsom’s benefit?

So the last decades of the UK Labour Party is the template US Democrats should be following?

The Dane County Sheriff’s Department got the wrong man. I got the right man. The wrong one was delivered to me as the right man, I accepted him on good faith as the right man. Was I wrong?

The words “loyal” and “disloyal” don’t appear in the actual study—that framing seems to be the article editorializing. It makes it sound like the issue is social relationships instead of policy differences.

Bi is the only completely certain sexual orientation—everything else is potentially contingent on the set of people we’ve met so far.

He’s just a man who doesn’t know how to sell a contradiction.

1.6 million cartons of eggs recalled. The title is off by a factor of twelve.

About a myriad gross baker’s dozens

And then showing a photo of a half-carton further reduces the perceived impact.

As well as being able to use the modifier “nearly” instead of “over”.

They can’t just say “over 19 million eggs” instead of “nearly 1.6 million dozen eggs”?

Especially when the article photo shows a carton of six eggs instead of a dozen?

Reminds me of Judge Holden in Blood Meridian, who sketched ancient artifacts in his personal notebook and then destroyed the originals.

Or Salma Hayek.

If they make a sequel movie based on her current activities, who will they cast to play Julia Roberts in the in-universe version of the film based on the first movie?