• 1 Post
  • 352 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: December 31st, 2023

help-circle
  • That “technicality” is a critical part of our criminal justice system. I’d much rather a criminal be set free than set the precedent that due process is optional

    Allowing exceptions here would open the door to all sorts of corruption. What would then stop the president from treating all his political opponents the same way? Have them all raided without cause and “find” all sorts of evidence

    By the way, the jury thing is jury nullification. The basic concept is that if a juror feels a law is unjust (or any other reason), they can vote not to convict even if the burden of proof was met for a conviction. The courts can’t tell the jury their verdict is incorrect. The only recourse is an appeal (which can’t happen in an acquittal due to double jeopardy)

    Jury nullification was used quite a bit in the North before the Civil War. Many Northern juries chose to acquit violations of the Fugitive Slave Act because they felt the law was unjust









  • What’s your source for that? I’d like to see the methodology as it can make a huge difference

    If I’m living with family because I can’t afford rent, some studies would consider me to be a homeowner because I reside in an owner-occupied home, despite the fact that would be a misleading statistic

    Alternatively, if I’m living with a spouse/partner and they own the home, with only their name on the deed, I am still effectively a homeowner but may or may not be included depending on methodology


  • Important caveat with that data: It’s showing the proportion of houses that are owner-occupied, not the proportion of people that actually own their homes

    So if I’m a young adult renting, then I hit hard economic times and move back in with my parents, I have now increased the homeownership rate because I would then be moving from a renter-occupied home to an owner-occupied home