• melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 days ago

    We should get all of our advice from little kids. They have not yet been bound by knowing what is or isn’t possible. The meek shall inherit the earth.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      We should get all of our advice from little kids.

      These articles tend to lean on click-baity “One Neat Trick” headlines, while disguising the more practical hit-or-miss reality of facial recognition software. Sometimes you can outsmart the computer. Sometimes it just fouls the system and fails out. Sometimes the system works exactly as intended.

      Little kids experiment around the edges of a system until they get bored or frustrated. In the aggregate, they can be very clever just through the number of permutations they try. Individually, your 12-year-old isn’t going to Hack The Internet reliably.

  • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    People act as if it was a bug and not a feature. This was intended. After people sufficiently make fun of the current solution that everyone knows how easily it is broken, the next step is requiring both ID and face scan and comparing photo on ID with face scan. Congrats, privacy is removed completely. Every poster is now tied with real life identity.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    124
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yeah, because it isn’t about that. They don’t give a fuck about kids seeing porn. Even when there are age checks, there will be plenty of free porn.

    It’s all about being able to connect an online post with the author.

    • U7826391786239@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      2 days ago

      it’s not just the author, but the author’s address, friends, family, employer, coworkers, shopping list, where they go and what they do in their spare time, what kind of health issues they have, who they’re having affairs with–pretty much everything, wrapped up in a bow by AI, ready to be spreadsheeted/cross-referenced across all those data points.

      what fascists do

    • pwxd@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      2 days ago

      They’re doing this age verification on purpose just to spy on adults lol

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, and get ready for those big platforms selectively leaking user data, sometimes with falsified stuff. Get ready for union leaders suddenly being outed for being into weird shit (often literally), all while they’re clueless and disgusted, as part of online smear campaigns. Always said that “cancel culture”/purity testing is a dangerous weapon that can be astroturfed by the enemy, and there’s already some precedent for that (most recently the whole Hasan dog thing). Even some leftists are trying really hard to cancel some “annoying” people among them.

  • GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    “Well, now that they found ways to bypass the checks, we need to introduce even more checks. Let’s make them spit into a device every time they turn on a PC, then check their age based on their genetic markers.” - Politicians

    • Watermark710@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      90
      ·
      2 days ago

      When I was little, my mom used to send me to the store with a note that said to sell me cigarettes, and that they were for her. When I started smoking, I used to reuse the notes to get my own smokes. I got my first fake ID at 13 so I could buy beer.

      • i078@europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        61
        ·
        2 days ago

        When I was 13 I could just buy beer, the trick was to make it look like you are helping your parents with groceries. So also pickup stuff like a carton of eggs, potatoes and milk. I never had any issue, but it was a different time and in Europe

        • jaybone@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah, that last bit is key.

          In German I think we were drinking in the clubs at that age. No “helping the parents with the eggs and milk” lol

      • Teknikal@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        My mum did the same thing she stopped when I used the £20 note to buy sweets, that was a lot of sweets back then.

    • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      I guess its a good thing that the point if this is just to tie a real human to their online presence and protecting kids never actually mattered.

      You know, for a given value of “good” being “actually very very bad”.

  • OddMinus1@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Oh no. All that’s left now that the age veifications are bypassed are the extensive public surveillance. Better leave that running.

  • Yggstyle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    2 days ago

    As someone who spent my formative days figuring out how to bypass early digital locks my school was putting in place to “protect us” … The system loses this game. Every time. You are taking kids with nothing but time, no apparent drawbacks, and everything to gain… And placing them against “good enough” implemented by people who could give two shits about it.

    This will continue to lose until they twist the knobs too tight and hit false positive central… And oops now the populace hates it. Control for thee is fine until its for me.

    Tale as old as technology itself.

    • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Mine was simple, but great. IE was hidden/removed in our typing class, maybe 5th grade. I guessed you could type a www.domain.tld in Word and when you pressed space, got a clickable URL that was still tied to IE. I knew about the URL, but learned it would still open with IE hidden. 🤣🤣

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I used to go to the “about Microsoft Works” pop up under the “help” drop down in Works (yes I’m old), and then click a URL on there that would open up a functioning IE window.

        We used to get up to so much shenanigans in high school computer classes… I remember playing Unreal Tournament over LAN with like half the class without the teacher knowing

        • Ledivin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          It was Quake for us 😅 I’m not even that old, it’s just the only game that was small enough to store on the shared network without being discovered

    • MimicJar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Even with false positives it won’t change anything. It’s just a small group of people. It’s worth it to “save the children”. If “the system” rejects you, then you must be at fault. Maybe we can even sell a “Super ID Check”. Just a one time $200 fee and then the system will leave you alone. (For 3 years, then pay the fee again, but renewal is even faster this time.)

      • Yggstyle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m not saying its going to happen quickly… But filtering in many forms has been tried in the past and they all died similarly. Some vocal group gets inconvenienced by it and then, under scrutiny, the blemishes get paraded out and the project dies a slow ugly death.

        The actual reason for the push right now is meta (among others) just want to wash their hands of the responsibility… And that aligns with some tech bros wanting to hoover up peoples ids and resell that info. The whole thing will sour once there’s a significant leak that ties risk into that bottom line and nobody will want to carry it.

    • SleeplessCityLights@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I slayed my MP. I Photoshopped my id to have their picture and address. Explain how monumentally stupid the law and and how only two groups would support it. People of incredible incompetence or people receiving a Quid Pro Quo. Highlighted everything Mike Harris did to set himself up to make a fortune after being premier and more examples. Went over the ethics commission’s laws or lack thereof. Finshished with “i will be using this id to look at the best of weird porn every day” and I will be contacting the ethics commission with a copy of this letter every 5 years until you die. Invited them to share this with whomever they want. I tied their career to the whole thing.

      If they are going to sell me out to Palantir, I am going to fuck their shit up. There is a quid pro quo with every peice of legislation this bad and we have remind them that there are more of us than them.

      • Kowowow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 days ago

        Oh that’s a great idea to use politicians to get past age checks assuming of course they don’t get butthurt enough to claim it’s full on fraud

        • SleeplessCityLights@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          You have to have the word Parody on it somewhere. Then it is not fraud. The thing looks so stupid anyways and has the security feature markings from my id anyways. I am not fooling a human.

          • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Not sure what you mean by that.

            I’m just writing an email to oppose this, my email is not like the above poster. I am just laying out arguments why this is a bad solution and will not work.

            Which is what we’re seeing with kids drawing moustaches and borrowing IDs at will.

    • fizzle@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Politicians don’t seem to function this way though. They don’t concern themselves with implementation details. People will vote for age verification even if it doesn’t work.

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    How about instead of trying every complicated stupid way to regulate users and especially children … you regulate and control companies and corporations instead.

    • 4am@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s not about the kids. It’s about knowing who is organizing protests, unions, and calling out wage theft, polluters, and whistleblowing illegal activities performed by the government and Epstein class.

      It’s about preventing access to online spaces, monetary transactions, and basically letting them erase you from society if you don’t offer them full-throated gratuity and allegiance.

      You know, just like ChInAs sOcIaL cReDiT sYsTeM.

      As usual here in the West, every accusation is a confession (or at least an idea for later)

      • StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        It’s been that way for ages around the world. The 2000s were full of news stories from places like Russia, with protests about the actions of their government and the treatment of political opposition. Those stories have largely died down, not because Russia changed, but because they clamped down on dissent. The US is just catching up. It wasn’t just Russia either. We’ve seen this globally with most major political activities over the last decade or more. Where once we were getting video of events in real time, now they’ve learned to shut down the internet, censor the digital forums, ‘flood the zone’. Where once you could be critical of this government or that, it has become an internet of heavily commercialized influencers. It sucks, man.

        Like…Russia, China, India, Iran, Isreal, UK, and a handful of others that I can’t remember.

        It’s happening everywhere and all in slightly different ways but it’s not JUST the US. I just tend to remember Russia the best because they are the closest to what seems to be happening in the US at a visual level. The old videos of arrests and protests in Russia almost mirror the modern ICE videos. I suspect it will only get worse.

    • SynonymousStoat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 days ago

      Or, ya know, make parents take responsibility for their own children and monitor what they are doing online. If you don’t want your kids seeing or participating in things online then don’t give them unfettered access to smart phones and computers!

      • vortic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        I kind fo agree and kind of don’t. I agree in that parents should take accountability for their children. That said, social media has been shown to be addictive and kids are frequently ahead of their parents technologically. One thing that could help is an education campaign that teaches parents how to effectively monitor their kid’s online activity. Parents need some help figuring out what tools to use and how to use them I think.

        • SynonymousStoat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          You are correct and I’m a little upset at myself that I left out the fact that educating parents should be something we put money and effort into as well.

        • backalleycoyote@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Good point. Kids know too much and get addicted too early. Adult know too little and can’t tell the difference between lies and reality. Everybody consumes way too much porn. That’s it, everybody put their phones in the garbage. No more Internet, everyone gets a landline, rotary dial, call on the other end does’t disconnect if you don’t hang yours up.

      • Zagorath@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I agree, letting parents do their job of parenting is the best way to deal with this. But the problem is that that’s very difficult, and they currently lack adequate tools.

        The best method would be to make sure operating systems support parental controls that parents can set, and require websites to respect those settings (and browsers to support an API passthrough of the OS setting). That way there’s no need to do any age verification that sends sensitive data like ID or faces to third-parties with sketchy privacy policies.

        Unfortunately, when moves were actually taken to implement this kind of solution, reactionaries pushed back and made sure it didn’t happen.

          • Zagorath@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Some guy put a PR in to the Linux kernal and to systemd, IIRC. The community pushback was huge, despite it literally just being a field users could fill in themselves if they wanted.

            I’m not sure if he ended up succeeding. IIRC last time I checked it was in systemd but not Linux, but that could have changed and I could be misremembering.

            • azuth@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              I think it was accepted in systemd. There was no commit in the kernel because such things are really don’t belong in the kernel.

              But the law it was a response too is horrible. If any ‘app’, regardless of it including any unsafe content (or content at all really) must ask for this information from the OS. Otherwise the developer and/or controller (which can be whoever installed the app) is liable for thousands of dollars.

              This only makes sense if you think the only ‘apps’ that exist are ones written by FAANG.

      • knatschus@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Combine both and demand parental controls for devices and services. The isp is paid for by an adult that’s the only age check websites should need. Parents should have easily accessible tools to mark a os or browser as used by a minor.

    • deliriousdreams@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Utah is trying. They claim they want to hold websites liable for Utahians who use VPNs to bypass ID checks. I don’t think that’s going to work, mostly because I have a lot of questions about how that could possible be enforced. But it’s funny to think about.

    • muffedtrims@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      And who’s payroll campaign donations are the politicians that are pushing these policy coming from?

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Not for the people pushing for this Orwellian shit.

      Most people will just comply, and “most people” is who they want to spy on and control.

  • Iconoclast@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m in my mid thirties and I’d still buy a mask or something to trick these systems if and when this becomes a thing in my country.