azuth

Do they have him in custody?

Except, as I have quoted, the USA did this to enforce a decision made by it’s domestic court.

The operation was undertaken to enforce a warrant from a U.S. federal court

Today our UK Armed Forces showed skill and professionalism in support of a successful U.S. interception of the vessel Bella 1 while on its way to Russia. This action formed part of global efforts to crack down on sanctions busting.

Well, certainly don’t count on the UK to support international law.

And yet there was a whole saga where world admins claimed being pro Luigi, especially mentioning jury nullification, constituted advocating for violence and they had to remove such posts due to ‘EU law’ according to legal advice they totally received.

New mods? Sir, this Lemmy.world .

Leader of the free world has quite a history, full of violations of other countries sovereignty.

They don’t mind regime change or unprovoked aggression against other countries. The US has a long history of such actions with no protest from the populace. Even Vietnam, the protest was about them having to risk their lives on the war. This time it’s because Trump is also dangerous to some of them.

Reactionary forks don’t have a great record of success (or even getting off the ground).

And how is actual real life in America?

Somebody call an ambulance!!

Saying the quiet part aloud, just like Donald.

Holy shit a person dead for three consecutive years. It seems zero charges brought on (surely manslaughter?).

Why are you quoting the definition of meat? Your previous comment was about sausage.

If the qualifier is only meat, nothing can be called a sausage with all the filler and other ingredients they’re adding these days.

Which the proposal defines as:

But to the legislators of the EU, a sausage can now have only one meaning: a cylindrical object containing meat.

Nowhere does it say only meat.

That’s a dishonest representation of the qualifier. It’s must have meat not must have only meat.

He is going to pardon a random murderer…

Civilian aircraft can also turn off their transponders, not that it’s relevant.

ATC not having radar is not an issue, the US military most certainly had multiple radars in range. They could tell the tanker to divert way earlier. They wanted an incident.

As for normalcy, the US is part of a small group of countries that has shot down civilian airliners.

Taiwan claims sovereignty over mainland China, I doubt Venezuela does the same with the US.

Just like they asked you to upgrade to ie in the 90s a d early 00s.

Well it’s science fiction. Being ‘genetically perfect’ (rofl) will impart less of an advantage than actually existing, mundane factors such as wealth and which country you were born in. Hell, the biggest advantage they could get is making sure their children is of the ‘right’ color.

I do not even think the biggest assholes like say Musk would genetically modify their children. He already thinks he is perfect.

I can also think of a few factors that would disadvantage poor people more than lack of eugenics.

Lack of healthcare. Climate change leading to people having to abandon their homeland and also exacerbating another factor. Bad nutrition. Bad education in combination with disinformation by wealth controlled media.

Genetic modification is not really a problem. It could also help some people if we fix our politics and make sure people get access to healthcare based on needs rather than means.

Seriously, fiction is not necessarily a good guide for politics.

It’s fiction.

You can find actual discrimination based on genetics or wealth or class into the present and past of the real world.