• zaphod@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    That’s already a thing, I’m talking about putting a 4g/5g/6g base station on an aircraft.

    • lime!@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      with the prices they charge for the wifi, what do you think would happen to ticket costs if they added a 5G transciever?

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        “Welcome to your eight-hour flight. If you would like to use wifi, please sign up for only $40 per hour. Enjoy your voyage!”

      • fonix232@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        The point isn’t to provide 5G but to reduce devices reaching outside the plane for connection…

        • lime!@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          if they could get carriers onboard to sponsor the installation then maybe.

            • Harvey656@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              The first part of that comment was unnecessary Fonix, you do not need to resort to name calling.

            • lime!@feddit.nu
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              yeah that doesn’t work. if they can’t reach out from the base station they try picking another one. so it would make the problem way worse.

              • fonix232@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                Except it does work - the base station simply needs to emulate the connectivity check servers. It doesn’t even need to do anything fancy, just route all packets to a locally running microserver that responds to ICMP Echo, HTTP and TCP requests and so on.

                Governments already use this approach for blocking out areas (e.g. during protests) while also grabbing mobile phone IDs and other data, via mobile base stations. The exact same could be applied to the ~10 minutes of takeoff and landing time.

            • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              Phones will try to route around a malfunctioning base station that is isolated from the internet.

        • lime!@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          it would increase costs because that’s what airlines do whenever they get a new gadget.