• fonix232@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    The point isn’t to provide 5G but to reduce devices reaching outside the plane for connection…

    • lime!@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      if they could get carriers onboard to sponsor the installation then maybe.

        • Harvey656@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          The first part of that comment was unnecessary Fonix, you do not need to resort to name calling.

        • lime!@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          yeah that doesn’t work. if they can’t reach out from the base station they try picking another one. so it would make the problem way worse.

          • fonix232@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 minutes ago

            Except it does work - the base station simply needs to emulate the connectivity check servers. It doesn’t even need to do anything fancy, just route all packets to a locally running microserver that responds to ICMP Echo, HTTP and TCP requests and so on.

            Governments already use this approach for blocking out areas (e.g. during protests) while also grabbing mobile phone IDs and other data, via mobile base stations. The exact same could be applied to the ~10 minutes of takeoff and landing time.

        • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Phones will try to route around a malfunctioning base station that is isolated from the internet.