• lime!@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    if they could get carriers onboard to sponsor the installation then maybe.

      • Harvey656@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        The first part of that comment was unnecessary Fonix, you do not need to resort to name calling.

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        yeah that doesn’t work. if they can’t reach out from the base station they try picking another one. so it would make the problem way worse.

        • fonix232@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 minutes ago

          Except it does work - the base station simply needs to emulate the connectivity check servers. It doesn’t even need to do anything fancy, just route all packets to a locally running microserver that responds to ICMP Echo, HTTP and TCP requests and so on.

          Governments already use this approach for blocking out areas (e.g. during protests) while also grabbing mobile phone IDs and other data, via mobile base stations. The exact same could be applied to the ~10 minutes of takeoff and landing time.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Phones will try to route around a malfunctioning base station that is isolated from the internet.