• Harvey656@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      The first part of that comment was unnecessary Fonix, you do not need to resort to name calling.

    • lime!@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      yeah that doesn’t work. if they can’t reach out from the base station they try picking another one. so it would make the problem way worse.

      • fonix232@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Except it does work - the base station simply needs to emulate the connectivity check servers. It doesn’t even need to do anything fancy, just route all packets to a locally running microserver that responds to ICMP Echo, HTTP and TCP requests and so on.

        Governments already use this approach for blocking out areas (e.g. during protests) while also grabbing mobile phone IDs and other data, via mobile base stations. The exact same could be applied to the ~10 minutes of takeoff and landing time.

          • fonix232@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 hours ago

            It’s the same for all generations.

            Internet checks are easy to take with a simple HTTP+IGMP service. 2G/3G also did a slightly different connectivity check but that can be faked too.

            • lime!@feddit.nu
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              at that point it feels easier to just connect the base station to the same satellite receiver the onboard internet uses

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Phones will try to route around a malfunctioning base station that is isolated from the internet.