So, OS-level age-gating is going federal, which will effectively kill your rights to device ownership and what’s left of free speech and expression.

Enjoy your free speech while you still have it because this is a clear attempt to erase that right.

SOPA never died, it just went into hiding until time to reemerge, and now’s that time, this is basically SOPA in a save the kids trenchcoat.

  • Tenderizer@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Goodbye device ownership, and the last vestiges of free speech will die with this bill as well.

    The last vestiges of free speech always has and always will be offline.

  • Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    2 days ago

    Motherfuckers want this so they can more easily find kiddies to groom and rape.

    Start selling the narrative folks, this is not gonna be a clean war

  • willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    That bill had just been introduced. It is a loooooong way from passing. No need to panic. This is not our doom yet.

    Now is the time to give those representatives a call, mention the bill number, and tell them in a few logical and polite sentenses why this bill is a terrible idea.

    Fuck this bill. And it’s not going to be too late to use the less polite methods later. We lose nothing by trying to be polite first.

  • NutWrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    2 days ago
    1. This bill is being pushed by Meta and they are NOT going to stop with age verification. It is not about “protecting children” and it never has been. It’s always been about surveillance and control. Meta wants to know who you are, where you are, what you buy, what you download, who you associate with and what your politics are.

    2. If Meta succeeds in putting all this on your computer at the operating system level, then what is the point of even having a VPN anymore? Also Meta will sell this information to anyone who asks for it.

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Meta is pushing this because their platforms are overrun by bots. Ironically because partly of the AI tools they have created. And advertisers have caught up and aren’t willing to pay top dollars anymore on Meta’s platforms. Hence why Meta desperately wants a way to proof that their traffic comes from real people.

  • qaeta@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 days ago

    Parents ALREADY decided. They decided they didn’t give enough of a shit to use the parental controls already available to them. No legitimate reason to push this shit on everyone else.

  • 4grams@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    3 days ago

    If this thread is any indication, we’re cooked. If this many people are willing to give the government the benefit of the doubt, after what we’re dealing with…

    This will not be benign, it will seem innocent at first, but we’ll have given up yet another seemingly simple thing that will eventually be used against us.

    • mPony@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      3 days ago

      evidently Palantir wasn’t able to use all available data and a few glaciers to find out who was saying mean things about Important People With Money. This oughta fill in those gaps.

  • hackitfast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 days ago

    Disgusting. This is my representative, I unfortunately voted him in.

    Our president is a pedophile and we still get the “for the children” bullshit. How about making a law requiring tracking the data on the Epstein class phones instead?

    I sent a letter to him, hopefully enough people do.

    • grumpusbumpus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      Lately, it seems like bottles of incendiary liquid are the vogue medium of communication, rather than sternly-worded letters. I think it’s like toggling that “flag as urgent” setting on an email.

  • someone@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I disagree with all of you. Now that our benevolent theocratic autocratic overlords have decided to track everything we say and do and escape is impossible, I completely support their brave new dystopian agenda. All hail the wonderful leaders!

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    maybe for you…but not for me.

    I’ll switch back to a dumb phone and run a Linux distro so obscure nobody’s seen it for 25 years.

    fuck em. I’ll never comply with this shit.

  • Formfiller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    129
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    They can’t even arrest the pedophiles in government but they want to mass surveil us for everything.

    • Hakuso@scribe.disroot.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      The rules have always been for us, not for them.

      The police are enforcers for the elites, they don’t stop crime, they extract fines from people and provide a deterrent to anyone standing up for themselves.

        • Jax@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          With what organization? The left is too busy with shit like tone policing for any cohesive narrative to take root.

          Turns out when your brain is filled with no-no words that effectively act as thought terminating cliches you end up being unable to effectively communicate with people you disagree with. Crazy how the far right simply does not have this problem, no? Granted they aren’t really for ‘discussion’ or ‘debate’ or ‘deliberation’ in the same way leftists are, and their thought terminating cliches are much worse; climate change being one of the big ones.

          • androgynouscloudmoon@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            US left is way too disorganized, but this isn’t because of “”“tone policing”“” (no you cannot say slurs) or debating the specifics of ideals (of course the right doesn’t do this, they have no ideals, don’t copy the child rapists).

            It’s because of, among other things, a decades-long operation to systemically crack communities, down to there being basically no infrastructure to even meet up at except the library or church, and also to keep everyone so exhausted and distracted they don’t bother trying.

            Solving problem #1 is harder but problem #2 involves communicating with people locally who you can actually work with (marginalized groups aren’t going to work with violent bigots, if this annoys you, talk to the bigots yourself) and joining local orgs to meet needs – rent/utilities assistance, building community toolboxes and fridges, generally moving people away from “barely surviving” so they can actually develop an interest in leftist ideals

            • grumpusbumpus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              There is absolutely hyper-fixation on identity politics over material conditions. This has been an intentional project to move the realm of political discourse and conflict to the immaterial.

              Yes, not being a bigoted asshole matters, but also it’s a wedge issue that absolutely moves otherwise poor, oppressed people away from solidarity. I don’t know how you bridge the problem, but as long as those people are on the other side, that’s a problem, and you ignore it at your peril.

            • Jax@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Yeah I have no issue with not saying slurs (and saying I can’t say slurs is fucking dumb, I choose not to because I understand why I shouldn’t — not because trogs on their high horses tell me no), my problem is that you took the phrase ‘shit like tone policing’ and immediately assumed this must be the singular problem I have with how the left communicates. Thus spurring on an entire comment on why the left doesn’t communicate with the right.

              I’m not suggesting the left communicate with the right, at all. I’m suggesting the left needs to learn how to communicate amongst itself because things like no no words end up functioning as thought terminating cliches — see your entire comment for reference.

              • androgynouscloudmoon@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                I understand what you’re saying, but this is an issue that mostly exists between (don’t like this term much but can’t think of a better one) extremely terminally-online leftists who do not organize.

                Going offline, this is generally just not an issue, the orgs filled with people who just argue over theory also don’t do much and shouldn’t be listened to. It’s a large movement and there are bound to be people who are unfortunately less effective.

                I didn’t bother discussing how online leftist infighting affects real life, it’s not relevant compared to, say, the much realer issue of left-orgs blowing up because of, say, someone being outed as a sex pest or someone slandering someone they don’t like anymore (which isn’t an issue only relegated to the left, the right does this way more often)

                • Jax@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I didn’t bother discussing how online leftist infighting affects real life, it’s not relevant compared to, say, the much realer issue of left-orgs blowing up because of, say, someone being outed as a sex pest or someone slandering someone they don’t like anymore (which isn’t an issue only relegated to the left, the right does this way more often)

                  Please don’t get me wrong, my motivations were not ‘both sides’ or something along those lines. Maybe not obviously, but it’s clear to me that we both believe the side bringing measles back is the wrong one.

                  My problem is that these terminally online leftist spaces end up being the narrative sent to (or experienced by) the brainwashed masses on the right. Simply not engaging with an online space is ineffective when trying to combat their manipulation of word of mouth messaging.

                  I’m not trying to argue for the right to say slurs. Unless they’re directed at conservatives, then I’m conflicted.

    • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Yes. I suspect this is all because we successfully arrested Epstein.

      They worry we won’t actually stand for their kidnapping and raping our kids, unless they strengthen their grip.

    • Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      3 days ago

      I was reading a list of bills and whatnot from March the other day. They all say “and for other purposes” they all say that

      • SippyCup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 days ago

        This one literally just tacks it at the end of the proposal. As it gives no purposes other than “and for other”

        • Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          yeah, I was following up on a bill introduced by one of me senators and was poking around this website https://www.govtrack.us/

          I dont know why, but every bill has this phrase written at the end of it. It is ominous, and I dont know why theyre written this way, probablt some legal bullshit.

          • Poojabber@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            3 days ago

            Its the same reason even traffic laws are written ambiguosly. It gives everyone from cops to senators the ability to do what they want and then get away with it.

  • grumpusbumpus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Obligatory: the Democrats are not here to save you.

    Fascism with a smug smile instead of a sneer.