• Landless2029@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    149
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    This needs to be updated.

    Getting hit by a pickup truck at 30 MPH is similar to getting hit by a Honda Civic at 120 MPH for kinetic energy.

    That’s besides the fact that pickups have a much taller hood vs sedans so there are significantly higher rates of head/internal injury.

    Taller cars and trucks are more dangerous for pedestrians, according to crash data

    https://www.chicago.gov/city/en/sites/complete-streets-chicago/home/traffic-safety/vehicle-size-and-speed.html

    • vestigeofgreen@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      10 days ago

      Your math is wrong. Kinetic energy scales linearly with mass, quadratically with speed. The graphic you included supports the idea that at same speed, the pickup truck has double the KE. The 120 mph sedan has dramatically more KE than a 30 mph pickup.

      Assuming that your sedan has exactly half the mass of the pickup, it would match a 30 mph pickup’s KE at 30*sqrt(2) mph, which is somewhere between 40 and 45 mph.

    • HereIAm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 days ago

      There’s quite a large discrepancy between this image and OPs image. This image says the survival rate of 30 mph (48 kph) is 60%, while OP’s image says 50 kph it’s at 20%. I wish they included a source for the data that could explain it.

      This is the same issue I take with braking distance scales. They often vary wildly, and some don’t even follow a quadratic increase in distance like you’d expect.

    • 8baanknexer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 days ago

      The energy difference is only really relevant if the thing you’re hitting is significantly heavier or at least similarly heavy like a house or another car. For a person it’s still much worse, but that is moreso because of the high hood of the car.

      I know pickup trucks are heavy, but I’m surprised they are 16 times heavier than a Honda civic. The more you learn.

      • Landless2029@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        10 days ago

        I’d rather be hit by that at 20 MPH instead of a full duty lifted pickup with a fresh shiny paint job on chrome wheels (mall crawlers)

        I don’t think pickup trucks should be banned. They should be commercial use only. It’s not a family car or a daily driver.

        Fuck mall crawlers

          • Landless2029@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            10 days ago

            So they passed laws for emissions and fuel efficiency of passenger vehicles to help with pollution.

            These laws force MPG ratings on sedans and SUVs. But they’re looser for trucks. Car manufacturers realized its also looser since its calculated by weight.

            So these fuckers decide to build SUVs on pickup truck frames and make pickups even bigger so they don’t have to tighten up the fuel efficiency…

            This is one of the main reasons there are so many bigger class vehicles being made now.

            Add in all the new LED headlights. Which are too bright because the regulations are outdated based on wattage instead of lumens.

            So you have taller vehicles with brighter headlights blinding everyone.

            I’m at the point where I’m aiming for a SUV instead of a sedan for my next car…

            • SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              10 days ago

              If you dudes want to start over, feel free to copy our regulations. It would also allow you to sell cars here. LED headlights are great, given they keep to regulations.

              Best, an European.

    • Seth Taylor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 days ago

      Well… the person in the last photo looks like they’re not happy about getting hit by a moving vehicle at all.

    • backalleycoyote@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      I got hit by a large SUV doing between 30mph and 40mph a few years ago. I can’t tell you why or how, but I had a split second to twist and plant my hands on the hood and jump so I went up instead of under. Went into the windshield (broke it) and then got launched when she slammed on the brakes. It put my radius and ulna into my hands, my back into my guts, and knocked my brain so hard I gave the emergency crew a phone number that belonged to a girlfriend I’d broken up with almost 20yrs prior. Took me a year to be able to write again, not just physically. I’d start putting words to paper and end up with gibberish because between my brain and my hand it didn’t connect. Had to leave post-it notes around the house as a check list- did you eat, bathe, brush your teeth, feed the dogs, piss? My ability to sleep was wrecked, no circadian rythym. I don’t entirely believe in fate, but how the fuck that didn’t kill or cripple me boggles my mind (what’s left of it) daily.

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    10 days ago

    Great now do SUVs for the Americans. Go ahead and assume they are not simultaneously being shot at just for the purpose of keeping the simulation simple.

  • otp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    10 days ago

    Damn. I didn’t realize it was so drastic. 100% fatality rate seems crazy, even rounded

  • Jiral@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 days ago

    But just wait for the deafening screaming of people when 30km/h limits are enacted in front of schools because that would dramatically reduce lethality of accidents, while costing car drivers maybe a few seconds of drive time, if at all. It is quite a spectacle.

    • Taleya@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      I live near an intersection. Drivers will ten second horn blast because someone won’t crawl up the arse of the car in front of them just so horatio can mount the kerb and get into a sliplane they can’t exit until the lights change anyway

      So what i’m saying is you’re underselling the stupidity

    • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      How dare they put an authoritarian surveillance system (speed camera) near the school. This is an unfair tax on normal people. Its not about safety, it is about control. - most of my city until the province outlawed speed cameras entirely.

      • Jiral@lemmy.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        In all seriousness, paint doesn’t enforce speed. What you need is to rebuild streets for that speed. Have a look at the Netherlands for reference. You need pretty little enforcement when streets are built for 30 km/h. Narrow, priority pumps at crossings for pedestrians, where your car seat is punch through your pelvis if you go anything faster than 30 km/h …)

        • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          You are right, but there were also several studies done that proved the speed cameras lowered speeda significantly, even after the camera had been relocated.

          Lets not let perfect be the enemy of good. Those cameras reduced speeds and generated revenue for the city that was specifically dedicated to making streets safer, including bollards, lane narrowing and speed humps. The removal of the cameras both made the streets more dangerous, and cut funding for real safety improvements. All because speeders were getting caught speeding and considered that unfair.

          • Jiral@lemmy.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            Sure. But if roads are built for the speed, the road enforces the speed. If driving faster will shake you so badly that it feels like an accident, most people won’t do it. Also making streets narrow, with tight road crossings and curves, and subjectively more dangerous to the car drivers, actually makes streets safer, especially for people outside of cars.

            Of course that is not possible everywhere and then speeding controls, including cameras are the next best thing.

            • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              We can’t just update the roads for free. The cameras were a big part of the plan to make the roads safer.

              • Jiral@lemmy.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                Sure and don’t get me wrong, this pro reckless driving action is nothing I support either.

    • Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      30 km/h zones are great, I can relax a bit with my small city car knowing there’s pretty much no way I’ll kill someone

      • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        I’m guilty of this when using a web browser, I’ll scroll down a page and open relevant posts into new tabs until I’ve accrued several. Sometimes I don’t get to them for quite a while so if I upvote it’s surprising how high the number jumps until I realize it’s sat there for half a day.

        I try to refresh when commenting because 9/10 times someone else has already commented the same thing since the internet is dead but sometimes I forget.

      • psud@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        The op image uses speeds much slower than that. The top speed in op is 60km/h which is about 35mph

    • Tiresia@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 days ago

      So multiply by 0.62.

      I believe in you, this is what all those years in grade school trained you for.

  • olympicyes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 days ago

    There’s a new neighbor at the end of our street with small children. She always puts one of those green children at play signs in her front yard, yet insists on driving 25-30mph down our suburban street. The rest of the neighbors hate her.

  • WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 days ago

    I remember a public safety ad being shown that showed the difference in either 30 and 35mph or 30 and 40mph. Was quite dramatic.