cross-posted from: https://lemmy.org/post/1872634

So, starting now, Google started mandating full JS for YT, effectively breaking all third-party clients and locking the site to their official client.

This reeks of DRM.

UPDATE: Installing Deno and installing yt-dlp through PyPi fixes yt-dlp but the very idea that Google is mandating JS to lock down YT in an attempt at pseudo-DRM is still crappy.

UPDATE #2: inv.nadeko.net is working again for now.

  • MystValkyrie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I am so glad I had the foresight to use yt-dlp to back up most of my favorite videos. Not all of them, but I just thought we’d get more time.

    But yeah, I knew this would happen. The age verification thing was really controversial, so Google would have had to expect that people would try to find other ways to access YouTube. They won’t stop here and will go after Deno and NewPipe.

    I’m pretty much done with YouTube. It’s just not what it used to be. All my favorite YouTubers are either gone, have changed for the worse, or are on Nebula. It’s mostly just slop, and I won’t miss it.

    • criss_cross@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I wish there was a place that had agdq and speedrunning clips. Then I could leave.

      Twitch is atrocious for archived content.

    • absentbird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Nebula is just a better experience most cases too. It just shows you what you’re subscribed to in chronological order, which is how YouTube used to work when it was less annoying.

      It also shares more revenue with creators and doesn’t force feed you ads. I really hope it continues to grow and never betrays its roots.

    • iii@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Sadly there’s so much good music from the 2000s on there that I can’t find elsewhere. Small bands that never really broke through.

      Inaccesible because of autocratic morons.

  • NovaSel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    As someone who is listening to a video on NewPipe as I type this very comment, no they did not

    • Jhex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Came here to say this after giving it 24 hours in case it was just lucky timing

      However, now if I try to watch a YT vid in Firefox, I get the “Oops something went wrong” right when the Ad should have popped up

      • BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’ve gotten that occasionally, it usually fixes with a refresh. Was it persistent for you?

        • Jhex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          yeap… happened again after the refresh

          I had almost given up on youtube since they blank out your home if you do not allow them to track history so this may have started a bit back. I only went on it because someone sent me a link and I just opened it directly… all in all, just another reason to not use YouTube

          • wabasso@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Haha I actually love having a blank Home (and especially blank Shorts) since as it has significantly moderated excessive YT use for me. I’m honestly surprised that was their course of action as it ultimately had reduced my use of the app.

          • BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Well, that’s super lame! I wish there was a good alternative. I’ll probably stick with it as long as ReVanced works.

  • That Weird Vegan she/her@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    The day smart tube next stops working is the day i stop using youtube. I will NEVER watch a shitty youtube ad and I’m sure as shit not paying google any money whatsoever.

    • RamenJunkie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      What I don’t understand. Like, they know people hate shitty ads.

      If they had like, literally any level of vetting on the ads, people might actually watch them. But its all fucking scams or podcasts of lies pretending to be ads etc.

      I know it costs money to have people but sales people serve a purpose.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        They have a bank of companies that are paying to have their ads shown.

        The companies dictate who they want to market to.

        Google originally pitched scanning your things for relvant ads and delivered on it, but that’s not where the money is at.

    • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s so weird hearing about YouTube ads. I can’t recall ever seeing one. I know one day they’re going to finally ruin it and I won’t be able to consume it any more, an event I try to prepare for, but I haven’t really done anything special to avoid ads except all the stuff you have to do just to be secure on the web in the first place. Like just using librewolf out of the box works fine?

    • Rooty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m gonna start listening to podcasts, they’re more informative and less bandwidth heavy anyway.

  • DonutsRMeh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    2 days ago

    They’re going to keep enshitifying it until they kill it completely. Them blackholes, I mean shareholders, will never have enough money.

    • devedeset@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      They won’t kill it, just like it hasn’t died so far. The content, viewer demographics, and algorithm continue to shift. There’s too much money with all the ads and subscription fees. Most people view some content on it by default.

      Its gonna be the new cable TV in a way. Kinda sucks, some good stuff on it, but mostly slop filled with ads. And everyone will still use it. Even if they block all 3rd party access, people like me are still going to use it to some limited degree. There will be a video about how to fix a random plumbing fitting that is leaking in my house, or how to fix some random thing on my 15 year old car.

    • 6stringringer@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Overheard at the last shareholders conference. “Until everyone empties all their ecoin & change jars and the only things left to eat are those mysterious Budding’s sandwich meats with some shit ass processed excuse for a loaf of bread.” This is where we want the average American citizen to be living/existing/panicking.” I dunno his name, but it was for sure a rich, old, white dude. A real Montgomery Burns type looking MF’er. I dunno? They all look the same to me. EDIT: Apparently I fit that demographic according to the young ‘uns visiting us. Although they think I look like “The Dude” from “The Big Lebowski”.

    • tempest@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      The market that accesses YouTube from a PC or Mac is shrinking rapidly.

      They would prefer you use one of the apps and at some point that will be the majority, if it isn’t already

      • blargh513@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        That is by design.

        With an actual computer, you have a lot more options in terms of how you can handle the content. They don’t own your PC (yet) but they do own the mobile market and the operating system entirely.

        You don’t have any form of root/admin access on a mobile device of any type nor any other device (tv box, game console, tablet, etc). For the handful that have jailbroken or rooted their phones, many apps don’t work (by design of course). You can do it, but you’ll break a ton of stuff in the process. That’s enough to keep causals from doing it and leaves the tiny group of hardcore dorks that are willing to live with the complexities that are required.

        I’m going to put on my tinfoil hat and say this is what keeps any real attempt at a Linux phone in the gutter. If people had a choice for their mobile operating system and the freedom to do what they want with it, the big tech companies would shit a brick. They’ve already removed the ability to block ads on mobile devices for the vast majority, they’re finally getting what they wanted (save the handful of Firefox users left).

        Linux phones won’t be a thing until there is hardware for them. With apple/google phones, the manufacturers will not release the necessary software so that is needed for a 3rd party OS. Google and Apple will make sure that anyone who makes hardware for them are legally tied to keeping that software tightly closed. Even if someone did manage to reverse engineer it, it would be a herculean effort and would break as soon as a new release is out (or if one of the manufacturers “accidentally” released some exploit code for the reverse engineered drivers).

        It’s an ugly world these greedy fucks have made for us.

        • DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          They don’t own your PC (yet)

          MS pretty much owns the desktop PC space with Windows though, and even though there’s nothing stopping you from installing an alt OS on PC generally, Win11 not supporting anything older than Zen+ or Coffee Lake and flat-out refusing to run on anything older than Bulldozer or Nehalem even without support because everything before those arches lacks the POPCNT instruction, isn’t a good sign to say the least.

          Hopefully MS don’t start acting like Google and start breaking WINE/Proton and DXVK/VKD3D and crippling Linux gaming and even general desktop use on Linux, or even forcing Pluton to be enabled platform-wide blocking the ability to install alt OSes.

        • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          It’s an ugly world these greedy fucks have made for us.

          We EAGERLY helped them. We walked into the cage and clasped the manacles all by ourselves.

          • wabasso@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Who’s “we” though?

            I see the largest two camps here as (1) casuals that don’t have the know how to protest via alternatives and (2) the tech literate that are willing but ultimately limited by the larger forces at work.

            I think it’s fair to blame the people with the power that exploited the first group and left the second without choice.

      • zqps@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah last I’ve seen even smartphones and tablets are decreasing quickly relative to smart TVs.

  • nom_nom@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    2 days ago

    Holy shit I did not realize how complex of a project yt-dlp has to be to do something as simple as download a video… Kudos to the devs

  • carrylex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    This post’s title is just completely incorrect and it looks like 700+ people didn’t even read the comments or the actual issue for one minute.

    Good job guys!

    • Liam Mayfair@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      I mean sure, OP’s title is somewhat clickbaity but it’s kind of true though. YouTube have broken compatibility with all existing unofficial clients. It’s good that yt-dlp are managing to work around it. I expect many other clients will follow suit but some of them may be unable to install additional dependencies and remain broken.

      Ultimately, what is the last straw that will break the camel’s back? Every client/consumer will have their breaking point.

      • carrylex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I mean sure, OP’s title is somewhat clickbaity but it’s kind of true though.

        Somewhat? Did you read the issue? Here’s a recap: yt-dlp will introduce a proper JS runtime in the future to better cope with YT’s JS. That’s it… that’s the issue.

        YouTube have broken compatibility with all existing unofficial clients.

    • CriticalMiss@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Well… the only available option to them for DRM that will work on all devices is Widevine L3 which is entirely bypassable. Spend a few hours on the net and you can figure out how to do it too.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        The only pre-baked option to them…

        If they require a full JS implementation, they could crap out different algorithms and rotate you through them. I’m afraid they’ll eventually use a coding LLM to generate daily algorithms.

        Imagine YT-DLP needing to adjust to code changes daily.

      • DFX4509B@lemmy.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Well, if they want to make everyone either buy Rokus or watch YT either in Edge on Windows (the official way to watch Netflix on PC currently) or on another Android device than a Roku with the official YT app, they could just implement a full Widevine L1 lockdown, and sadly, just buying a Roku to watch YT on or watching it on a pre-existing Roku along with the paid streaming services, is probably what most people would actually do if they locked it down like that.

        Basically, Google would win the ad blocker and third-party front-end war by locking YT into pre-approved apps or devices, and as an added bonus (for them), they’d snuff out any competing platforms as Widevine L1 would also kill the ability to mirror one’s YT channel to one of the alternative platforms, and I guarantee most people who just post any random thing on YT don’t store their source video files locally to be able to to re-upload on PeerTube, Odysee, or Rumble, if anything, they’re likely just filming and posting straight from their phones.

        Now, the people with nice studio setups probably do have a local copy of their source files stored somewhere that they could re-up on their alternative platform of choice, but average Joes filming from a phone outnumber them.

        • CriticalMiss@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I don’t think L1/PlayReady SL3K will happen. Imagine Google telling people that in order to view content on their website they need to use a competitor’s browser. Sure, technical people like you and I understand what’s happening behind the scenes, but average joe will just think Google fumbled it and can’t make it work with their own browser, it’s bad press for them. I also think that at least for now there’s too many desktop users to be able to pull it off. They’ll have to tell all the desktop users to go fuck themselves in order to do that, and that will get a good amount of people pissed off.

      • Krudler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Could you briefly summarize what’s needed to make it happen? Not asking for a step-by-step just very rough overview

          • Krudler@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            You’re basically just saying go get a guide like you could have just not said anything LOL

            • CriticalMiss@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Not sure what’s up with the self-entitlement but I got shocking news: I don’t own you anything. You asked for a brief explanation and I told you where to go find it. Instead of writing that snarky comment you could’ve instead used the web for its original purpose and conduct your own research and not bug strangers on the internet to do your bidding.

    • NotKyloRen@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I cancelled YT Premium after paying pretty much since Google Music was a thing. The price keeps going up ($14/month now here in the US), and Lite is meh even for the discounted price (e.g. no background play I think?).

      They just keep building the wall higher and higher, while they survive only because creators keep filling it with content. Nobody is watching “YouTube Originals” or their first party content. YouTube exists solely because of third party creators.

      Not only that but I can survive with Brave or Firefox with UBO or whatever. It’s not that hard to avoid the ads, even if it’s a little inconvenient vs being able to use the app.

      • AndyMFK@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        If you’re using your phone, definitely check out YouTube revanced. Or if on a tv check out Smart tube next. No ads, sponsor block baked in. It’s all the perks of premium (plus more) without the cons of supporting an evil company

      • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        You can either revance your yt music app, or use Firefox with an extension that keeps videos playing while your phone is locked.

    • CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      It’s annoying but I guess they’re just evolving their anti spam mechanisms, which shouldn’t surprise anyone.

      JS is one of the most popular scripting languages anyway so having it as a requirement shouldn’t hinder anyone.

      And not to throw shade at the people who designed yt-dlp, but designing a tool to “scrap” the content of an evolving platform in a different language (with different tooling etc) than the one said platform is expecting to be consumed by might have been a mistake

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        anti spam? on the video player? you cannot think is seriously.

        JS is one of the most popular scripting languages anyway so having it as a requirement shouldn’t hinder anyone.

        except any of the clients that care about not running whatever untrusted google code in an unrestricted environment.

  • ikt@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    203
    ·
    3 days ago

    youtube has a monopoly on video content, they can (and will) do what they want

    • DFX4509B@lemmy.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      72
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Otoh, you also have Odysee and PeerTube to move your own content to.

      • Chozo@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        160
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        Those are fantastic solutions if you don’t want anybody to watch your content.

        • Gutek8134@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          50
          ·
          3 days ago

          You can post it on those first, and on YouTube a week later, the way some creators promote Nebula or their Patreon

        • DFX4509B@lemmy.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          At least you own your content on those platforms, PeerTube especially if self-hosted, and not Google. If you self-host a PeerTube instance using local hardware, for example, no one can take it down on a whim but you.

          With YT, Google can and will nuke your channel for any reason they see fit.

            • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              2 days ago

              I’m assuming they mean de facto, not de jure.

              In reality YT can do whatever the hell they want. You aren’t going to win from their entire team of ivy leage lawyers unless you’re independently wealthy yourself.

            • DFX4509B@lemmy.orgOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              3 days ago

              Lessee, recent censorship issues, the fact that you can get demonetized or straight-up struck down if you say something Google don’t like, the fact that your channel can and will get taken down if Google don’t like you…

              • fatalicus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                3 days ago

                That isn’t Google owning your content though, just Google deciding what you can do with your content on their service.

                • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  It is for all functional purposes the same thing.

                  If you don’t own and control it and someone else does and you have no power or ability to stop them

                  You don’t own it

                  To try to draw a line here is pointless in anything but a debate of technicalities and reality doesn’t care about those.

      • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        45
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        The fediverse is kind of like a dandelion growing out of the cracks in a concrete slab.

        Hopefully the seeds take.

        • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          3 days ago

          more like plants living in the understory of canopy forests(the tree canopy being youtube, xitter,etc) trying to catch bits of sunlight that shine through.

          • mostlikelyaperson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yup, the fediverse has a lot of things still to solve and figure out before it goes anywhere. I have little faith that present moderation would scale well if there was a massive growth in the userbase. And then there’s the other issue. There’s a discussion on the peertube github for two years now on how to keep instances from dying.

            • Ŝan@piefed.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              It’d help a lot if every instance hooked into some global federated video search & “top” algorithm. Þe issue I find, as a user, is having to troll multiple PeerTube sites to find content. I don’t really see þe “federated” part of it. Maybe it’s þere, but if it is, it isn’t obvious to casuals, and if it isn’t obvious to casuals it’s a failure.

              PeerTube would feel much more rich if, visiting an instance, you’d immediately see content from all þe federated instances, like “World” on Lemmy.

              • xnx@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                2 days ago

                The way you write the is so annoying to humans and does nothing against ai.

                • Flagstaff@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Last I spoke to @[email protected], the hope was that more people would adopt the thorn symbol and mass-influence AI. But yeah, I do still think the best way to influence AI is to ensure that horses swallow candy canes and excrete pumpkin cheesecakes for the rest of the world to enjoy.

              • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                you missed a thorn in algorithm.

                where is my prize?? :D

                I don’t really see þe “federated” part of it. Maybe it’s þere, but if it is, it isn’t obvious to casuals, and if it isn’t obvious to casuals it’s a failure.

                I think it’s because that contrary to the lemmyverse, peertube does not auto-accept federating servers. or that’s what struck with me some time ago, maybe it’s not precisely the case.

                • Ŝan@piefed.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Makes sense, and I guess it’s understandable as video’s riskier content. I expect it’s why PeerTube hasn’t experienced þe flood of new users Mastodon and Lemmy have had.

        • DFX4509B@lemmy.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Couldn’t posting your normal content to PeerTube or whatever, and then selling premium content on Nebula to fund the would-be free PeerTube portion, be a potentially viable model vs. gaming the AdSense system on YT and hoping for the best?

          Like, if you cover the same niche as Not Just Bikes, for example, but replace YT with PeerTube, that could maybe work provided you have a big enough following.

          • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            Why not both? As far as I can tell, only Nebula originals are restricted to just one platform. Everything else is in two places. I think you could totally play the same game with a PT+Nebula combo.

            • DFX4509B@lemmy.orgOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              Mainly because PT’s a better fit to Nebula being creator-centric, vs. YT where it’s what Google says goes and you have basically no say over your content.

              • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                3 days ago

                Yeah that’s a better pair as far as censorship is concerned. On YT, you need to dance around sensitive topics as if you’re talking to a child.

                However, as there are more viewers on the bigger platform, abandoning that place doesn’t happen so easily. It’s basically like Facebook all over again. Isn’t there a term for this type of inertia…

                • Leon@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  Honestly, you shouldn’t talk to children using words like sewer slide, ledollarbean, or unalive. I fucking hate this algospeech. It drives me to violence.

        • NateNate60@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          3 days ago

          Nebula never works well for me. The seeking and tracking causes endless buffering, and sometimes not even a hard refresh fixes this. Their site is just so buggy but when it works, at least it works decently well.

          • floofloof@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            I’ve used it for a year now on Linux, Android and Windows with no problems at all. Maybe something else is causing your issues.

  • courval@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    The world needs a p2p alternative, what are our current options? I wouldn’t mind alocating 500GB or more of my storage space just to get rid of these fuckers. These fascist gangsters are taking millions of people hostage who depend on YT for their livelihood…

    • DFX4509B@lemmy.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      You got PeerTube for that, but anyone who kills their YT account and moves to PT full time will need to secure alt funding somehow either through Nebula, merch sales, getting a W-2 job, or a combination of the three, though, even if they host on a physical server they own and not on a VPS; buying the parts to build a decent PT server is going to be a pretty heavy up-front cost in itself although there wouldn’t be any monthly costs and especially monthly data storage costs like on a VPS.