cross-posted from: https://lemmy.org/post/1872634

So, starting now, Google started mandating full JS for YT, effectively breaking all third-party clients and locking the site to their official client.

This reeks of DRM.

UPDATE: Installing Deno and installing yt-dlp through PyPi fixes yt-dlp but the very idea that Google is mandating JS to lock down YT in an attempt at pseudo-DRM is still crappy.

UPDATE #2: inv.nadeko.net is working again for now.

  • Chozo@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    160
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    3 days ago

    Those are fantastic solutions if you don’t want anybody to watch your content.

    • Gutek8134@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      3 days ago

      You can post it on those first, and on YouTube a week later, the way some creators promote Nebula or their Patreon

    • DFX4509B@lemmy.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      At least you own your content on those platforms, PeerTube especially if self-hosted, and not Google. If you self-host a PeerTube instance using local hardware, for example, no one can take it down on a whim but you.

      With YT, Google can and will nuke your channel for any reason they see fit.

        • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          3 days ago

          I’m assuming they mean de facto, not de jure.

          In reality YT can do whatever the hell they want. You aren’t going to win from their entire team of ivy leage lawyers unless you’re independently wealthy yourself.

        • DFX4509B@lemmy.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          Lessee, recent censorship issues, the fact that you can get demonetized or straight-up struck down if you say something Google don’t like, the fact that your channel can and will get taken down if Google don’t like you…

          • fatalicus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            That isn’t Google owning your content though, just Google deciding what you can do with your content on their service.

            • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              3 days ago

              It is for all functional purposes the same thing.

              If you don’t own and control it and someone else does and you have no power or ability to stop them

              You don’t own it

              To try to draw a line here is pointless in anything but a debate of technicalities and reality doesn’t care about those.