cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/46449191

U.S. President Donald Trump said on Saturday Ukraine should agree a deal to end the war with Russia because “Russia is a very big power, and they’re not”

  • npdean@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    69
    ·
    1 month ago

    How? What cards do they hold? What can they give in exchange for their land?

    For example, Russia can stop the “special operation” if Ukraine gives them the land they want.

    • protist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Unfortunately, you and I both know that even if Ukraine were to agree to cede some land to Russia, there’s nothing stopping Putin from continuing to sow instability in Ukraine or from still trying to take more of their land. In fact, he has a demonstrated track record of lying about this.

      • npdean@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        50
        ·
        1 month ago

        True. Trump, Putin, Xi are not to be trusted but there has to be an end to the war. Ukraine cannot win it, it is clear since day one. There has to be some sort of diplomatic solution once there is a ceasefire.

        People in the comments (and West, in general) don’t understand how terrible war is. They think them supporting Ukraine to prolong the inevitable is a good thing. They are killing thousands of people and the outcome is unlikely to change. So many deaths in vain.

        A very stupid and naïve argument people make is Putin should just leave Ukraine and the war will be over. Why would he give up a winning game? It is simple solution to a very complex problem, and simple solutions are rarely correct solutions.

          • npdean@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            30
            ·
            1 month ago

            It might be but people cannot keep dying for this stupidity because Ukraine is not going to win, it has been clear from day one. So why push more people into the blender?

              • npdean@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                22
                ·
                1 month ago

                Agreed. But they are not going to stop, so we should let more people die?

                • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  15
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  If Ukraine were to all-out surrender, Russia would continue to kill Ukrainians and take territory. Do you really think Russia would pack up their stuff and go home?

                  • npdean@lemmy.today
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    16
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    An all-out surrender is not smart. There has to be a ceasefire and then diplomatic solutions sought for. As much as I dislike Trump, he is correct in saying that there will be land swaps. Ukraine has to get guarantees and security measures in exchange, without it there should be no deal.

                • FiremanEdsRevenge@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  If your home gets broken into are you not going to defend it? Or will you let the burglar keep your own house so he won’t kill you.

                  • npdean@lemmy.today
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    19
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    I will defend it but once it is established that I am not going to win, I will seek to protect what I can instead of risking more for what has been lost.

            • whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              How much of history do you have to ignore to think a country in a defensive war cannot hold off against a larger army until attrition causes the attacker to withdraw?

              • npdean@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                1 month ago

                It can happen but nothing so far has happened here. It has been more than 3 years

                • whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  The long length attests to the eventual victory of the defender, not the attacker. Russia leadership thought they could win in days, not years. They’ve had 30,000+ hours and haven’t captured Kiev yet, assuming it’s a lost cause from day 1 is completely unjustified. What reason do you have to believe it was decided from day one?

        • Typhoon@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          People in the comments (and West, in general) don’t understand how terrible war is.

          Of course it’s terrible. But have you thought about how terrible being subjugated by Russia would be? They already have a track record of kidnapping Ukrainian kids and doing who knows what with them.

          Do you think once the war ends everything will be happy rainbows and cupcakes? Of course not. Conquering Ukraine is the first step in atrocities against its people.

        • Slotos@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          Are you stupid or are you paid? „Let them have land” is literally the simplest most retarded solution, yet you dare use that descriptor against something else.

          Ceding land to Russia doesn’t stop people from dying. Never did, never will do.

          I get it, your sorry pathetic ass is tired of war that you’re not affected by. You’d rather sweep a few million lives under the rug and call it peace.

          Well, your voice belongs under that very rug.

          • npdean@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            1 month ago

            Ceding land is something which is going to happen whether you like it or not and whatever replies my comment gets. It is just the real, on ground situation

            • Rob Bos@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              Russia is almost out of tanks, their economy is a shambles, their oil is barely profitable, and they lose 3 men for every one Ukraine does. They may well lose.

              Germany lost ww1 this way, they simply could no longer sustain the conflict economically. Wars of attrition look impossible until they suddenly collapse.

            • Goodman@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Not necessarily. You could end up with the Korea scenario, or India Pakistan border with everlasting tension between the two.

        • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          You call 250,000 Russians killed and 1,000,000 total Russian casualties a “winning game?” Do you play Squid Game on weekends for fun?

          • npdean@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            21
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yes, because war is won by winning or losing assets. Casualties are a side thing. It is fucking sad but it is what it is.

            • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              war is won by winning or losing assets

              On that front, Russia’s Soviet inheritance is spent. Covert Cabal regularly does videos on Russia’s remaining tank fleet and there is nothing of note left in storage. They all blew up in Ukraine. Every single link there is a picture or video of an exploded Russian vehicle. Click on a few, then just scroll, scroll, scroll, scroll…

              • npdean@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                1 month ago

                Russian war production is more than 3 times of whole Europe. They can bear some losses. Mineral rich land is much more valuable than weapons.

        • protist@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 month ago

          I would argue this is pretty naive and stupid:

          For example, Russia can stop the “special operation” if Ukraine gives them the land they want.

        • FiremanEdsRevenge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          This is also very naive and very stupid

          People are already dying ffs. Stop the deaths that are happening right now than fearing for potential genocide. I don’t even think Putin wants a genocide, he just wants land. Edit - It is extortion 100% but what is the alternative?

    • theprogressivist @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Oh yeah, just give them the land they want. Just like Taiwan and China. Just give them the land they want. Or with Russia and Alaska, just give them the land they want. You sound incredibly stupid.

      • npdean@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        32
        ·
        1 month ago

        This works before the war. At this stage, it is moronic to think Ukraine is going to get a better deal than Russia.

        • theprogressivist @lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          What deal? There is no fucking deal? I’ve dealt with stupidity before but goddamn you’re taking the cake.

              • npdean@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                26
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                People are already dying ffs. Stop the deaths that are happening right now than fearing for potential genocide. I don’t even think Putin wants a genocide, he just wants land.

                Edit - It is extortion 100% but what is the alternative?

                • theprogressivist @lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  18
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  And there it is, ladies and gentlemen. The West isn’t doing anything. Ukraine is the one who was invaded by Russia, and Ukraine is the one who will continue fighting until Russia is out. It was a matter of time before you started regurgitating Russian propaganda.

                • nogooduser@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  There are several problems with making a deal like that.

                  The primary one is that they already had a deal with Russia and Russia broke it in 2014 and then again in 2022. So why would anyone believe that another deal would stick? They’d just take time to regroup and be back a few years later.

                  Another is that making a deal where Russia keeps the land that they have control over isn’t a deal, it’s letting Russia keep what they stole. What would Ukraine get from this deal (other than the end to the war as you pointed out)? That’s like making a deal with a burglar saying that they can keep what they stole as long as they get out of the house.

                  • npdean@lemmy.today
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    12
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    The primary one is that they already had a deal with Russia and Russia broke it in 2014 and then again in 2022. So why would anyone believe that another deal would stick?

                    Agreed, it is not wise to just give up land. It has to be accompanied by solid security measures and guarantees. As I said in another comment, there has to be a diplomatic solution after a ceasefire.

                    They’d just take time to regroup and be back a few years later.

                    So can Ukraine. Ukraine can also make use of the time.

                    That’s like making a deal with a burglar saying that they can keep what they stole as long as they get out of the house.

                    Yes, because he has a gun to my head. I will gladly let them take my whole house if that happened.

    • Zorque@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      What can they give in exchange for their land?

      “How can we make them pay for something that was stolen from them?”

      I suppose it truly is a capitalist approach…

      • npdean@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        It is not capitalism. It is robbery or extortion. But what is the alternative at this point? Let more people die?

        • Zorque@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          You really think it’s going to stop them from killing people to get what they want? It’d only embolden them.

          It’s not like Russia is relying on highly valuable lives to them. And they clearly don’t care about lives of the other side.

        • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          This option was tried last time, and here we are. Russia has made it clear that the only option is how much do they want to fight to not be part of Russia. I’m not sure if they can fight enough to stop it, but peace and sovereignty is not an option. As Europeans, I’d push hard to help them because they won’t stop with Ukraine, but they can make it abundantly clear that there are cheaper options than expanding west.