cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/46449191

U.S. President Donald Trump said on Saturday Ukraine should agree a deal to end the war with Russia because “Russia is a very big power, and they’re not”

  • npdean@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    50
    ·
    1 month ago

    True. Trump, Putin, Xi are not to be trusted but there has to be an end to the war. Ukraine cannot win it, it is clear since day one. There has to be some sort of diplomatic solution once there is a ceasefire.

    People in the comments (and West, in general) don’t understand how terrible war is. They think them supporting Ukraine to prolong the inevitable is a good thing. They are killing thousands of people and the outcome is unlikely to change. So many deaths in vain.

    A very stupid and naïve argument people make is Putin should just leave Ukraine and the war will be over. Why would he give up a winning game? It is simple solution to a very complex problem, and simple solutions are rarely correct solutions.

      • npdean@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        30
        ·
        1 month ago

        It might be but people cannot keep dying for this stupidity because Ukraine is not going to win, it has been clear from day one. So why push more people into the blender?

          • npdean@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            22
            ·
            1 month ago

            Agreed. But they are not going to stop, so we should let more people die?

            • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              If Ukraine were to all-out surrender, Russia would continue to kill Ukrainians and take territory. Do you really think Russia would pack up their stuff and go home?

              • npdean@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                16
                ·
                1 month ago

                An all-out surrender is not smart. There has to be a ceasefire and then diplomatic solutions sought for. As much as I dislike Trump, he is correct in saying that there will be land swaps. Ukraine has to get guarantees and security measures in exchange, without it there should be no deal.

                  • npdean@lemmy.today
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    8
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    Guarantees from US and Europe I mean. How can you take guarantees from your invader. But guarantees from them have also failed, so yeah I agree. But there has to be some sort of end to this massacre.

                • Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  11
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  There already was an agreement made when Ukraine gave up its nuclear arsenal, and look what happened. You are incredibly naive.

                  • npdean@lemmy.today
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    8
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    True. It was agreed that everyone will protect Ukraine. Russia was a bitch and broke it. What is stopping others from protecting Ukraine? Supplying weapons is not the end of their duty. They should have sent soldiers to fight, but they won’t. Because they don’t want their people to die. It has been mare a proxy war.

            • FiremanEdsRevenge@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              If your home gets broken into are you not going to defend it? Or will you let the burglar keep your own house so he won’t kill you.

              • npdean@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                19
                ·
                1 month ago

                I will defend it but once it is established that I am not going to win, I will seek to protect what I can instead of risking more for what has been lost.

        • whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          How much of history do you have to ignore to think a country in a defensive war cannot hold off against a larger army until attrition causes the attacker to withdraw?

          • npdean@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            1 month ago

            It can happen but nothing so far has happened here. It has been more than 3 years

            • whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              The long length attests to the eventual victory of the defender, not the attacker. Russia leadership thought they could win in days, not years. They’ve had 30,000+ hours and haven’t captured Kiev yet, assuming it’s a lost cause from day 1 is completely unjustified. What reason do you have to believe it was decided from day one?

    • Typhoon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      People in the comments (and West, in general) don’t understand how terrible war is.

      Of course it’s terrible. But have you thought about how terrible being subjugated by Russia would be? They already have a track record of kidnapping Ukrainian kids and doing who knows what with them.

      Do you think once the war ends everything will be happy rainbows and cupcakes? Of course not. Conquering Ukraine is the first step in atrocities against its people.

    • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      You call 250,000 Russians killed and 1,000,000 total Russian casualties a “winning game?” Do you play Squid Game on weekends for fun?

      • npdean@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yes, because war is won by winning or losing assets. Casualties are a side thing. It is fucking sad but it is what it is.

        • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          war is won by winning or losing assets

          On that front, Russia’s Soviet inheritance is spent. Covert Cabal regularly does videos on Russia’s remaining tank fleet and there is nothing of note left in storage. They all blew up in Ukraine. Every single link there is a picture or video of an exploded Russian vehicle. Click on a few, then just scroll, scroll, scroll, scroll…

          • npdean@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            1 month ago

            Russian war production is more than 3 times of whole Europe. They can bear some losses. Mineral rich land is much more valuable than weapons.

    • Slotos@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Are you stupid or are you paid? „Let them have land” is literally the simplest most retarded solution, yet you dare use that descriptor against something else.

      Ceding land to Russia doesn’t stop people from dying. Never did, never will do.

      I get it, your sorry pathetic ass is tired of war that you’re not affected by. You’d rather sweep a few million lives under the rug and call it peace.

      Well, your voice belongs under that very rug.

      • npdean@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        1 month ago

        Ceding land is something which is going to happen whether you like it or not and whatever replies my comment gets. It is just the real, on ground situation

        • Rob Bos@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Russia is almost out of tanks, their economy is a shambles, their oil is barely profitable, and they lose 3 men for every one Ukraine does. They may well lose.

          Germany lost ww1 this way, they simply could no longer sustain the conflict economically. Wars of attrition look impossible until they suddenly collapse.

        • Goodman@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Not necessarily. You could end up with the Korea scenario, or India Pakistan border with everlasting tension between the two.

    • protist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      I would argue this is pretty naive and stupid:

      For example, Russia can stop the “special operation” if Ukraine gives them the land they want.

    • FiremanEdsRevenge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      This is also very naive and very stupid

      People are already dying ffs. Stop the deaths that are happening right now than fearing for potential genocide. I don’t even think Putin wants a genocide, he just wants land. Edit - It is extortion 100% but what is the alternative?