• Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    14 days ago

    Making “smart” devices that can’t do routine mundane things without an active internet connection is completely fucking stupid.

    • Taleya@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      I’m just boggled by the fact that “a toilet you flush with your phone” ever gof off the stoner couch. who the fuck wants to pull out a phone and press a button every time they take a piss.

      Sensors if you move, yeah they’re a thing that’s given us all a surprise shifting our weight but a fucking app???

      • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 days ago

        Yeah I would expect a “smart” toilet to flush when I stood up or moved away. Why anybody would ever require a phone to turn on a faucet is beyond ridiculous.

        • Fribbtastic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 days ago

          “Smart” apparently doesn’t mean “it does things on its own” but simply “you can control it over our app”

          • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            13 days ago

            You not only can control it with our app, you have to - so when we start showing un-skippable ads on our app you can either watch them of buy a new faucet. Smart like a fox!

      • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        who the fuck wants to pull out a phone and press a button every time they take a piss.

        There could be a use case in public restrooms or retirement homes, but a usage sensor and timer would do the job better.

    • rekabis@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      About 3-4 years ago I took a bit of a dive into the firmware of IoT devices. The utter lack of security and the amount of information being hoovered up to the mothership made me swear to never build anything “smart” into the renovations of my current home. Sure, there will be automation. There will be CCTV. There will be solar with battery backup for essentials. There will be conveniences of all kinds. But virtually all will be air gapped, incapable of remote rooting, and under my full control.

      Hell, even my laser printers are HP models over two decades old - an HP 4050DTN and an HP 5000DTN - that are totally devoid of any DRM or “smart features” and can trivially take generic overstuffed cartridges that can do 20,000 sheets at 5% coverage.

      • Damage@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        ZigBee and Z-wave create their own network not connected to the internet, pair that with Home Assistant 🇪🇺 and done, sane smart home implementation.

        • rekabis@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          Will have to look into that, thanks.

          One of my key implementation requirements, however, will be resiliency, which means simplicity will be a core feature. The more “moving parts”, the easier it will be to break.

          • Damage@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 days ago

            It’s not easy to make it any simpler. You’ve got to control those devices somehow.

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      The more I hear from big tech companies the more I want to reject it. I don’t even own a printer.

      • rekabis@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        Go for older laser printers. They’re bulletproof, cheap on toner, free of DRM, and even if they only come with an LPT port you can always build your own print server that gives you all the bells and whistles like AirPrint.

  • OfCourseNot@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    15 days ago

    I can consider acceptable for the kettles to be connected to the internet if, and only if, they answer always with a 418 status code.

    • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      I’m perfectly fine with enabling a connection, just not requiring one.

      For example - my lights are automated. They have a switch though. If they went offline (or my server does), I can press the entirely local switch and have light.

      As a reminder though, 418 is supposed to be the response for requests of the teapot to brew coffee.

      • CandleTiger@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        15 days ago

        I can press the entirely local switch and have light.

        Are you sure about that? Is it a local connected smart switch (still fancy electronics, just local) or a plain old power switch?

        If it’s a power switch, and If you turned your lights off by app over the internet, and then the internet went out, then your lights’ ability to come back on when you flick the physical switch depends on somebody having thought about this need and programmed a “oh, the switch was flicked so I better ignore the internet settings” mode.

        And if they did that, it also probably means your lights all turn on after a power outage since the light can’t tell the difference between power outage and light switch flipped off.

        • GreyBeard@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 days ago

          Any smart lights I’ve seen always turn on when going from no power to power. It’s a little annoying when the power blinks and half the house lights up, but it means physical switches always work.

  • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    Maybe it needs a connection cause it takes a picture of your feces and sends it to an AI analysis service. If anomalies are detected, it tells you that you should take the stool sample to a laboratory for further study, then lets you flush. Poof, smart toilet. I could see people with too much money buying this.

    Edit: Thought about it some more… why stop at feces images? Why not also have a high resolution camera pointed at your anus taking crowning shots and analyzing those. Tell users if anythings wrong. The future is bright brown boys. The future is brown.

    Edit2: You could even have motion based security… alert if anyone broke in through your bathroom. Cameras in toilets people! What could go wrong?

    Edit3: Hear me out. User controlled bidet mode + anus camera. Take out your phone and clean your ass in first person. Score points if you clean your whole ass and compete on an online scoreboard. Tech sure is amazing.

    • Rinox@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      If anomalies are detected, it tells your insurance company so they can increase your rates or drop you before you actually need to go to the hospital and cost them any money.

      ftfy

    • Rakonat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      There is no reason it needs an always on connection for this. Even if there was a camera in the bowl taking pictures of poo (which raises so many privacy questions), the device could easily save hundreds of HD+ quality picture (assuming a toilet camera had that resolution) and send them next time connection is secure.

      Always online functionality only makes sense when the function itself is an online task such as a video call or looking up information not saved locally.

      Having an always online connection for a toilet suggest it’s gathering much more information passively from your home, using voice activated as a cover to always be listening and thus relaying what it records to server/data center to be filtered through for marketable or exploitable data.

      • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        Toilet’s chipset is only good for network connection and video recording. Business logic is on servers. As I said, users want to know if their shit is good before they flush so they dont lose a sample in case it is bad.

        You may have stumbled on multiplayer shitting though. Conference call with random strangers on the internet, biggest splashback, fastest bowel movement… endless possibilities. Yeah I think always online is the best course of action here.

  • contrapunctus@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing that cannot possibly go wrong goes wrong it usually turns out to be impossible to get at and repair.

    Douglas Adams

  • nfh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    If it doesn’t work well without the Internet, it’s a bad investment. Features that require the Internet degrading a bit is one thing, but if a toilet or toaster can’t do its basic job offline, it was ewaste the second it rolled off the factory line.

      • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        Except if the game is designed to be multiplayer-only, but even then we should be able to set up our own servers. If the original Half Life could do it in 1998 then why can’t we do it now?

        • nfh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 days ago

          If a multiplayer-only game turns down official servers, and you can’t self-host within the game, they should owe players a separate server binary they can run, or a partial refund for breaking the game. It should not be hard, especially if it’s a known constraint when they develop the game.

          • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            15 days ago

            How TF you expect that to work with MMO style games that may have significantly complex server infrastructure & deployment environments?

              • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                No it isn’t this is a crazy ignorant comment that just hand waves the problem I presented away because it’s not convenient enough for your stance.

                If you’re going to comment don’t comment in bad faith, that’s not the kind of discussions we need on lemmy.

                The problem begets the solution. And damn near every modern MMO has a significant set of challenges that they have built technological solutions for which drive more complicated infrastructure.

                • MadhuGururajan@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  it’s a bit of a straw man from your side to act like the discussion is about multiplayer when we are discussing about single player campaign based RPGs or about multiplayer when the company deliberately shuts it down in favour of a new version that just milks players for more money; or about toasters that definitely don’t need internet connection to function.

      • Comment105@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        Recently noticed how many of my “offline single player” games did not actually work offline, after moving and being without internet for a while.

        To anyone reading this, try unplugging your PC and check what your options actually are. I was really disappointed about not being “allowed” to play Red Dead.

    • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      I can see some purpose in having a ‘smart’ toilet for monitoring health. Your pee and poo can have some value in seeing if there anything that needs to be dealt with medically. But even that is difficult to do. For one thing, it must still function ad a toilet first before anything. Meaning it uses the simple mechanical flushing and refilling and stopping when it is sufficiently full.

      However for this the analysis and storage of data must be 100% at the user’s control. If they want it gone. It is gone. Irrecoverable. Any update must be done via USB or other connection. No wifi or internet.

      And even then the analysis can be off for obvious reasons. People need to scrub their toilets and some keep it clean by having one of those pucks in the tank that sanitize the water. All of these can interfere with any results out of a medical setting.

      • Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        Yeah but if they let users control the data then how are they supposed to sell it to insurance companies to boost their value to VCs???

  • RedFrank24@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    How the fuck can a faucet be smart? It’s a valve! It turns one way, or it turns the other way! It is only slightly less dumb than the counter top!

    • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      Yeah but what if you could make it worse? What if you could add the garbage motion sensor that takes ten hand waves to get working? Or add a touch screen that showed you visually how hot or cold the water was and could also show you ads?

  • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    The only thing smart I want is a faucet that activates with button OR the knee / foot sensor, and gives water always with a precise programmed temperature and flow.

    That and a temperature and timer controlled frying pan.

    Well an incinerating toilet that just dries burns my shit using a 340W solar panel would be cool too.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      Well an incinerating toilet that just dries burns my shit using a 340W solar panel would be cool too.

      Gonna smell real bad

      • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        Nah you’d have a chimney. The main reason I want a “separating drying toilet” is that it would have a fan and wouldn’t smell at all in your bathroom. And you’d probably also have a separating toilet as first step, then dehydration which can be closed cycle, and then either burning or compositing. And with that and biodegradable soap and detergents, sanitation becomes much less infrastructure intensive.

  • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    Day 3,801 of thanking God I was born a Luddite

    Anyone who thought their toilet would be improved by having an internet connection deserves this

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      I mean, it could be. Imagine getting a push notification when it overflows. The lowest pipe in my house is a toilet. Luckily my wife was nearby but it could’ve gone worse if we didn’t see for a bit.

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        This is a job for water detectors, which I have no qualms about connecting to the internet. They have the added benefit of detecting leaky pipes as well

        • JackbyDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          I could also see push notifications about adding bleach tablets or whatever to it periodically if that’s your thing. I have a smart fridge (probably the dumbest smart fridge you can get feature wise, doesn’t do much). I can check and adjust the temperature from my phone and get filter replacement reminders. It can send push notifications if the door isn’t shut which would be more useful if I had kids. Just because you don’t think you’d have uses for it doesn’t mean it can’t be useful.

          Again, with the huge caveat that the toilet be capable of manually flushing.

  • samus12345@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    It’s like the forcefields in the brig on Star Trek. Extremely stupid to not also have bars as a backup in case they fail.

    • Comment105@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      I don’t understand the idiots who insist on unredundant designs. Especially when it comes to handles. They’ve literally killed people with that decision.