So, they were non-violent offenders on house arrest, presumably all of these people were following the terms of their conviction.

That said, whoever compiled the list should have raised a flag on the ones that had many many victims.

Good.

Is it complicated? Or is it really fucking simple and these people just don’t like it?

Serial cheater, liar, bigot, etc etc

back into a corner a wild animal, it’s likely going to strike.

I wonder how many Americans are still rationing insulin.

Ikr

100%

Pfff current I was brain-dead, yes.

There’s smart plugs that measure current, I have some Emporia plugs at home.

You mean parallel right

They are never going to unless they declassify everything. Financial auditors won’t have the correct clearances for everything. Using an internal hire to complete the audits would be useless. It’s just a pony show.

Not really, if you don’t view doctors, nurses, technicians, researchers, or any of the other people as “the industry”

You can refer to men or women as they, as you are not specifying a gender with the world “they”

So you are making up grammar rules, this has nothing to do with gender. Bye.

No, it seems like you identify in a non-binary way and they/them would be an appropriate way to address you.

This isn’t saying you should or shouldn’t be addressed in a specific way, I’m saying it’s not clear what your gender identity is. You’ve stated an occupation, not a gender. I don’t want to get into how I disagree that gender can be an occupation, but you haven’t said anything about how an occupation can be a gender.

That doesn’t explain anything about you, which I asked.

Could you provide an article or some description expanding on that? I don’t know how that is a gender, instead of an occupation/ preference

It’s not about picking specific pronouns, though. People want to be addressed in a manner consistent with their gender identity. What is your gender identity?

He didn’t disagree. He’s trying to tell you, creating prescriptive grammar rules will make you less understood. You have decided to add a conlang feature to the English language. Your expectations on this are impossible to meet, because it requires the people that you are speaking with both research you AND internalize this rule only you have prescribed.

Or even, the government itself

https://ised-isde.canada.ca/site/corporations-canada/en/business-corporations/public-disclosure-corporate-information

For some people in might be self defence, who knows who has a treatable illness they were denied coverage for.

On it.