• Ethalis@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    11 months ago

    As a European living in a big city I never quite understood just how huge these things are until I finally saw one stuck in traffic in a tiny Parisian street. These things are massive!

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      Dude these things struggle to fit in American cities! My mother in law was taking my wife and I to a concert in Chicago and last second we had to change plans and drive our car because hers was too big to park in our reserved parking space. My small crossover which is tiny by rural farming community standards was a tight squeeze. Her truck also took up literally half of our 3.5 car wide driveway (my house is a former rental)

  • Naich@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    11 months ago

    The bed of that stupid thing is about twice as high as the useful one, so you have to lift the cargo twice as high.

        • ANGRY_MAPLE@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Ever notice how other vehicles don’t usually do that, even when they can? It’s possible to do in a wagon too, but that’s uncommon to see. You should look at the physics sometime.

          If your bed is empty, your vehicle will have less weight. Larger vehicles need that extra weight for traction, as their centre of gravity is higher. Smaller vehicles will have a lower centre of gravity, so they usually won’t need that extra weight.

          I’ve never seen that aspect described as a “pro” before. In the past, I’ve mainly only heard pick up drivers complaining about it being a pain in the arse to do.

          Edit: I think this might have been a joke lol. It’s too early. I’ll leave this up anyways

    • DasAlbatross@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      11 months ago

      I mean, this is a factor I’m sure, but the reality is people want the big trucks. The big trucks sell. That’s the major factor. If this were the real reason the EV trucks would be small, right? Well they’re not, they’re gigantic. You can hava long and wide wheelbase without a 5 person cab, you can have an extended bed. You can have a long and wide wheelbase without a giant front end you can’t see over. The footprint doesn’t mandate a tall, luxurious cab.

      • servobobo@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        11 months ago

        Do people want big trucks or have they been manipulated through clever marketing to want big trucks because they’re more profitable for the manufacturers (marketing included)?

      • snekerpimp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        Why are the contents of the cab in question here?

        Just because the market is doing something doesn’t mean the consumers are enjoying it. For some reason humans have to have the shiny new thing, whether or not it checks all the boxes. I’m sure the market is split on this subject.

        And why would an ICE vehicle company change the wheelbase of a model just because of the drivetrain? You need to keep models similar to help keep costs down.

    • NineMileTower@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah, blame the governmental entity that gets its hands tied behind its back by protectionist lobbyists and corrupt Supreme Court Justices, and not the the big 3 reaping the rewards. Just like the IRS and the USPS.

      • snekerpimp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        11 months ago

        Actually, most of the nerfing and defanging of the three letter organizations has been pulling of their funding by certain leaning politicians. The EPA made the rules with the help of the big three, they are all to blame.

  • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    11 months ago

    “Status symbol”

    Every time I see a bro dozer I automatically assume dude’s absolutely drowning in debt and either being propped up by his poor wife or living in a trailer park and 4 months behind on rent.

    • TheFriar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      11 months ago

      In my experience, everyone I know that lived in trailers were doing actual work and drove actual work trucks. Everyone I know that lived off parents money and drove to an office and never did a lick of manual work drove the big truck.

  • Ziixe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    11 months ago

    There’s this dude on YouTube called oats Jenkins and makes better versions of things, he made a “traffic 2” video and in it he said something along the lines of “oh and you will need a permission ticket for a pickup added to your driving licence if you want one, so that only people who need a pickup truck can have one”

    This is absolutely genius in my opinion, and I saw these big ass pickups spreading into europe, and like where I live (pretty small far away town of which there’s a ton of in Europe) they would take up somewhere to 3/4 to the full damn road (I saw someone drive one and it really went like that those things are as big as a bus)

  • BmeBenji@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    11 months ago

    More than once I have thought about getting a bunch of business card-sized notes professionally printed that say “I love how S H I N Y your truck is!” with tons of glitter and a rainbow-colored font for the word “shiny” to put on the windshields of all the clean trucks I see in the city near me

  • 5oap10116@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    11 months ago

    Frat boy house mate from Brooklyn in college had a dualie. Completely unnecessary for where he lived (home or at school). Dad was a biz kid, he was a biz kid…

    I asked him one day “what’r ya haulin’?”

    I am no longer friends with this man.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    11 months ago

    I really love the design aesthetics of older trucks. They were uniquely cozy in their own kind of way. I wish you could buy new small sized utilitarian trucks, but literally nobody in the industry sells them anymore because the consumer keeps buying these behemoth trucks and so luxury has become the standard when it should have only encompassed a small portion of the truck market share.

    • spinelessorange@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      11 months ago

      What’s fucked is it wasn’t even the consumers who caused the trucks to get bigger. It was poorly thought out emissions taxes. The US decided to tax car makers more for high emissions cars, but didn’t tax more for large truck emissions… So the car makers decided to make the light trucks bigger instead of trying to make the emissions better. People wanting luxury is a factor, but it’s not why they are nearly semi sized these days.

      Just look at the first image, the truck on the left is from the Japanese market where they taxed car makers less for cars and trucks under a certain size, those trucks are used in greater abundance than American style trucks as it is more versatile. If they had the option, I’m sure a lot of consumers would choose the smaller truck. Leaving the big trucks for status symbol pricks and people who actually need a big truck for towing.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I wish that 20 years ago, we had a serious discussion about emissions requirements. Catalytic converters increase CO2 output through a variety of direct and indirect means, but they reduce all other types of emissions. It would have been nice if we could have had an adult discussion about letting off some of those requirements in order to reduce CO2.

        Not much point now.

        • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Honestly I think they made the right call wrt catalytic converters. The stuff that they turn into CO2 is a much more potent and urgent threat than the CO2.

          The CO2 problem should have been solved with fuel efficiency, but as we’ve discovered here, it wasn’t. After realizing the unintended consequences of their laws, they refused to go back to them and admit there was a problem, because admitting means they were wrong and they can’t have that.

          (Also passengers cars aren’t really the problem. At least they’re small fish, that we’ve been tricked into focusing on so that the real polluters can avoid scrutiny).

    • Lesrid@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      Hell I miss little SUVs like the old RAV4. Great visibility and it can park in compact spaces.

    • HipHoboHarold@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      One of my friends in high school had one of those small trucks, and I always thought it was so cool. I’m not sure how often she used the bed, but it got decent milage still, it looks cool, and I’m sure it came in handy eventually. If I was looking for a truck, I would totally buy one. But I’m sure as shit not buying one of those pointlessly giant ones. Nothing about them is appealing.

  • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    11 months ago

    Aaaaaaah yes, the pavement princess. Drive like they own the streets, but never done a day’s work in their lives

  • deania@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 months ago

    I saw one of those with TWO cab extensions yesterday, there was like 2 feet of bed and the rest was just all cab. I cannot wrap my head around the thought process of whoever built that piece of shit.

    • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 months ago

      Oh it’ve very simple, they’re exempt form CAFE standards if it’s a utility vehicle. So they can build hummer esque land yachts and not have it tank the average fuel economy of their fleet.

  • Sewer_King@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 months ago

    What’s a guy gotta do to get one of those cool little cab over trucks in the US? I looked into it a while ago and it seems like they’re only made overseas.

  • Monkey With A Shell@lemmy.socdojo.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    Favorite truck I ever owned was an early 80s Silverado. 8’ bed, cloth bench seat, power/computerized nothing. Simple, functional, throw some bricks and sticks in the back without a second thought of scratches and dents…

    Fancy crap on a truck is just that much more to go wrong, but I’m sure it makes you real comfy.

  • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    I love comments criticizing trucks from Lemmy users who haven’t seen sunshine or touched grass in a year.

    Do any kind of outdoor activity, maintain a property or mild home renovation on the regular with your sedans and we’ll see how long it takes before they look beat to shit or have mechanical issues.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      80
      ·
      11 months ago

      This post isn’t criticizing trucks. It’s criticizing the oversized modern one’s that aren’t any better at work than the much smaller ones of the past.

      • Arcka@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        While I agree that pavement princesses are stupid, saying:

        oversized modern one’s that aren’t any better at work than the much smaller ones of the past

        is either very disingenuous or ignorant.

        The image calls out towing and compares something like a Daihatsu Hi-Jet with a Chevrolet Silverado 1500.

        In the are where I live, if you’re building a retaining wall you might bring a skid loader such as the Kubota SVL65. Weighing in at 3840kg (8465 lbs), the kei truck couldn’t pull that with its meager towing capacity of 600kg (1323 lbs). Meanwhile, the lowest 2023 Silverado 1500 has a towing capacity of 4309kg (9,500 lbs).

        A popular block used for retaining walls here is 40x30x6cm (16x12x6in) & 37kg (82 lbs). The Hi-Jet can haul 9 blocks in its bed, or about 13 in a trailer. Meanwhile, the Silverado could haul 23 blocks in its bed, or over two full 48-block pallets towed on a trailer.

        • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          a 1995 1500 could tow that as well and it didn’t have to be a pedestrian crushing monstrosity to do it or have a dinky 6’ bed. Just look at the 3rd picture in the OP to see what I mean.

    • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      11 months ago

      I bring enough ice fishing gear to over night on the lake in a hut and fit it all with room to spare in a small hatchback. The idea you need a truck to do outdoorsy things is mostly propoganda.

      • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        11 months ago

        No, it is. I used a Honda Odyssey when I was contracting. Way more room in the back to haul stuff around than a standard pick-up bed.

      • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yes, because everyone has the exact same use case as you. There can be no other outdoor activities which require more space than a hatchback. /s

        • IMongoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          42
          ·
          11 months ago

          There definitely are legitimate use cases for those gigantic trucks, but 90% of people who have those trucks don’t use them for those use cases.

        • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          11 months ago

          I can also go camping, paddling, mountain biking, snow shoeing, snowboarding. Really the main outdoor activities I couldn’t do are motor sports, and thats not really a traditional outdoor activity and my tow capacity is what stops me.

      • SupraMario@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        11 months ago

        I own a farm, and all the other farmers I know around here are so pissed with this new culture of people just buying them as a status symbol. The prices have doubled and they no longer make basic trucks for work. Almost impossible to get one that’s not got every electronic gadget on it. We don’t need heated seats and electric windows or fucking massage chairs built in. We need something that can haul stock trailers and flatbed rollers. It’s insanity. I blame all these people who pay 100k for a dually and never use it for what it’s intended for.

        • Perhapsjustsniffit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Farmer here as well. We use our truck. A lot. It’s the only vehicle we have and it’s 16 years old. It badly needs replacing but instead we keep repairing because of the extreme cost of a new one. It’s way beyond our reach and we won’t go into debt for it. Canada (where we live) just passed a bill that all new vehicles will be electric by 2035. That’s going to fuck us even further.

          • SupraMario@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            11 months ago

            Yeah it sucks, both our trucks are 20+ now, one is a 2003 and other is a 95. The prices for trucks are insane now. It’s a tool, not a fashion symbol.

    • Transporter Room 3@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      11 months ago

      I own a truck and I do not feel attacked by this.

      Exactly BECAUSE it’s used for hauling, I need the bed space for work, the ground clearance for personal hobbies, it’s a '99 that I can keep running with recycled parts, and it’s reasonably sized. I could do without the extended cab, but I didn’t exactly have many options when I needed a vehicle.

      Would I like to have a EVan with similar cargo space, ground clearance, and ease of maintaining/working on at home for a reasonable price? Absolutely. Unfortunately it doesn’t exist yet. So I do what I can with what I have, and don’t feel bad because this kind of post isn’t talking about me.

      It’s talking about my neighbor with a spotless, lifted raptor who needs it to feel like a big strong manly man when he goes to pick up the groceries and beer, and blocks the handicap van access by parking in the stripes next to the handicap spot.

    • Strykker@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      11 months ago

      First of all fuck you,

      Second I haul more sports equipment in my hatchback than most bro dozers ever do in their life.

      Hell I’ve probably moved more construction materials than them too.

    • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      11 months ago

      No one hates work trucks. We hate pavement princess. Trucks that are a status symbol, not work vehicles. Notice how the OPs image includes things like “same bed size” - realistically the only different work feature of the original two trucks pictured. Troll better.

      • Arcka@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        No. For workers volume is not the likely issue, weight capacity is - and the two vehicles are very different especially for towing.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      11 months ago

      Alright, so first you didn’t read the post. It’s about two trucks with the same bed size. However, one of the trucks is pointlessly large, to the point that it’s actually harder to use it to haul things since the bed height is so much higher. A truck with a lower bed is easier to load.

      Second, the vast majority of trucks are never used for anything a sedan can’t do. If your bed liner doesn’t have any scratches, you could have saved a lot of money and CO2 with a sedan. Hell, if you do need the cargo capacity a van (including a mini-van) can haul more cargo than a truck. A truck’s advantage is that it can carry oversized loads, not a lot of cargo.

      Third, if you do occasionally need a truck or other cargo carrying vehicle, it’s probably cheaper to rent one the few times you need it. The amount of extra you’re paying in gas and everything else will almost certainly outpace the price of a rental a few times a year it’s needed.

      Obviously there’s still some use cases for a truck. The smaller one will be better though, and 99.9999% of US truck owners don’t fit this group.

    • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      11 months ago

      Do any kind of outdoor activity, maintain a property or mild home renovation on the regular with your sedans and we’ll see how long it takes before they look beat to shit or have mechanical issues.

      Been using my Leaf to maintain my rural acre for 2 years now and the most beat up looking part of it is where my goats jumped on it the first time they saw it, and even that’s just a dent in the roof

      Have yet to need to rent a truck to do anything major, it’s all been quite easily manageable in my little car. Should I need a bigger truck, I can rent one really easily for the time I need to use it

    • Skybreaker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’ve had a home for 10 years and done all of these things without a truck. My cars are in great condition. Sounds like a capability issue.

    • Tiger Jerusalem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 months ago

      I second the others telling you to go fuck yourself. Go touch some grass instead of trolling on lemmy, or go back to Reddit.

    • SwampYankee@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      As others have pointed out, the outdoor activities aren’t that big a deal. It’s homeowner shit that they’re good for. Granted, I still think the full-size flagship models are pointless, mine’s just a mid-size. I can transport small engine equipment (ride on mowers, snowblowers) that wouldn’t fit in 99% of roofed vehicles. I can throw pavers, gravel, mulch, dirty tools, gas cans etc. in the bed without worrying about cleaning the interior or stuff getting into cracks, or noxious smells. All my plant waste from trimming and raking goes right in the bed and down to the local transfer station.

      I had a spent oil jug crack in my SUV once and it took months for it not to smell like a mechanic’s garage, not to mention the sludge stuck in corners that I literally could not get rid of and the permanent stain in the upholstery.

  • slingstone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Anyone remember light pickups? I had one of the last Nissan hardbody trucks, and I loved that darned thing. I abused the heck out of it and it lasted forever. There’s nothing really like it now. Supposedly the rebooted Toyota Stout will be in this range, but I suspect it won’t really be the same kind of truck.