Relevant because at the time of posting to statewide senate racebis separated by less than 100 votes.

  • Ghyste@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Where’s the “YoUr vOtE DoEsN’t cOuNt!!” crowd at?

    My house district race is separated by 63 votes. Same deal.

    • MelodiousFunk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Where’s the “YoUr vOtE DoEsN’t cOuNt!!” crowd at?

      Cackling over the 20,000 votes for the spoiler candidate.

      • Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Unfortunately those 20k votes likely would have gone to the democrat candidate instead had he not ran, simply on the grounds that he was registered as a democrat as recently as 2024.

      • sorghum@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        45
        ·
        2 days ago

        Some of us like voting for the best person for the job, not a choice between a shit sandwich or a shit burger.

        • Gerblat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          That’s why I always write in the name of the person I think would do it best, even if they aren’t running 😤

          Absolute clown

          • sorghum@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            22
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Absolute clown

            Won’t vote for that shit burger either. Besides, he’s currently in the white house

            • Gerblat@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Ok, but if you had to choose between:

              Trump again, or someone from his inner circle,

              a Democrat that isn’t ideal but that is at least saying they want to undo the damage he’s caused and try to remove him, or will at least work with the more progressive Democrats that will,

              or a pie-in-the-sky candidate that, while perfect for you, has essentially zero net-appeal to most people, and doesn’t actually have a chance in hell to win?

              Because I’ll tell you, in the end there are really only two options there, and only one of them is actually against Trump

              • sorghum@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                23
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                I wouldn’t vote and instead shift my focus to reducing the power that the pile of shit elected would have.

                I think that’s why all the tribalists are so afraid of ranked choice voting

                • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  and instead shift my focus to reducing the power that the pile of shit elected would have.

                  No you wouldn’t, because this isn’t even a thing you can fucking do.

                  I think you’ll find that nearly everyone here agrees with you about ranked choice voting. I’m really not sure why you seem to think we are afraid of, or against it.

                  • sorghum@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    Limiting the power of the branches by returning the power to the people directly is what I’m talking about. If that seems vague, it’s because it is. That idea isn’t limited to any particular topic. Ideally the power would be so limited that it wouldn’t matter who’s elected to the position.

                    Are you in party leadership? The people in leadership are the ones afraid of it because it means giving up the duopoly.

                • Gerblat@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  20
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Ahhh, the secret fourth option that’s also really a vote for Trump 😂

                  But I’m with you on ranked choice voting, that would absolutely be a lot better. But until we have that, not choosing IS choosing

                  • sorghum@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    19
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    This line of questioning is like asking a person if they would rather have the old octogenarian system 9 Mac OS or whatever fresh new shit Microsoft is pumping out. I’ve made my peace with being in the 3% or less in terms of my OSes and in my votes. I’m not willingly eating shit anymore.

                    You had a pundit on CNN last night lambasting Alaska for having RCV. People in power are doing anything to keep it and it’s why some of us see these contests with no real choice as having a uniparty system.

    • Stolas@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Where’s the “YoUr vOtE DoEsN’t cOuNt!!” crowd at?

      Don’t say that too loud. I really don’t want them to show up. I already know that the “election is rigged” crowd is out there waiting and I’m not sure if I have the sanity for it.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        The election was rigged, it was just done incompetently (like everything involving fascists). A lot of this blue wave is due to Republican gerrymandering backfiring because they left themselves too thin of a margin. This election proved that voting is still important even when the election is rigged.

        • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Gerrymandering is SOP for both parties. No guesses why its one of the only countries where its legal and partisans can draw boundaries.

          • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            No, in this regard both parties are nowhere near the same. They both suck ass but the shenanigans are extremely lopsided. You are gravely misinformed.

            Edit: oh, I forgot you’re a foreign agitator that has also previously spouted off absolute bullshit about how ICE is here to protect people and always follows “standard procedure”. You’re very credible.

    • roofuskit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, that and people often spend 11 billion dollars on things that don’t matter.

    • Sundray@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Where’s the “YoUr vOtE DoEsN’t cOuNt!!” crowd at?

      Since violence didn’t win a single seat this year, presumably in shambles.