• eicker@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    1 month ago

    Meta wants to be the global town square, but apparently Virginia Woolf and feminism are too dangerous for its ad system. Meanwhile the company keeps asking us to trust its algorithms with billions of people’s speech. If Meta can’t distinguish feminist literature from prohibited content, maybe it shouldn’t be the internet’s self appointed censor.

    • Riskable@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      30 days ago

      If Meta can’t distinguish feminist literature from prohibited content,

      You misunderstand… Feminist literature is the prohibited content. I’m not making a joke here. That’s literally their policy!

  • brsrklf@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    1 month ago

    “Stop being political!” say the people running the manufactured hate machine.

  • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Nobody needs meta. Just stop using any of their products.

    I can’t think of the last time I used Facebook or anything related to it, my life is better for it.

    Just leave them behind.

    • architect@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      30 days ago

      I went on there to figure out how to advertise my business and turns out that’s where fucking local culture went! So if you’re not on there you don’t know what the fuck is going on.

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    29 days ago

    I see incredibly violent and bigoted content all the time on Meta platforms and always report it. Rarely does anything get taken down. But feminism bad I suppose.

  • undrwater@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    30 days ago

    “After reaching out to Meta about why the promo campaign had been stomped out, the company replied that “any mention of civil rights, feminism or social reform are usually classified as ‘social topics’ by our automatic system,” and therefore rejected.”

    Wow.

    • redditStinksSuperBad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      30 days ago

      not that i’m a meta fan, I fucking hate that company, but this swings both ways. Imagine your local coffee shop is boosting posts about traditional marriage and pro-life themes. They get blocked as well.

      • madeofpendletonwool@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        29 days ago

        I just don’t go to that coffee shop. Problem solved. They can say whatever they want. If I don’t support it I don’t go. I don’t see how the coffee shop argument hold up. And if enough people hold the same views they close.

        Meta however is too big to fail. Which gives them a free pass to pass their cancerous views onto society while knowing no matter how much the general public hates them and their shitty views they will continue to use the platform because their friends and family still use it. Enshittification. If my coffee shop enshittifies I tell them to pound sand.

      • undrwater@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        29 days ago

        There’s no way to get around “any mention of civil rights” though. That covers all humans.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        29 days ago

        They do pay “content creators” who have views on the opposite side of the political aisle and when caught paying far-right activists, they said:

        “Such speech may be offensive to many, but it is not Meta’s role to police offensiveness,” the company added.

        While PAYING to advertise a book with feminism as a theme is not OK. They’re clearly pushing an agenda.

      • undrwater@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        Maybe. This was an advertisement for a book that had those themes.

        Personally, I don’t want either to be excluded.

    • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      29 days ago

      This is the problem with social media. Outrage drives clicks, so “feminism” is portrayed as a caricature of brightly died hair, “ugly” women, feeble men, and the stereotype of unemployed art students.

      It’s exactly what we were warned about in books like 1984 and animal farm. The media controls thoughts, who controls the media?

      • 1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        29 days ago

        Nah. It’s more that feminism started as equal rights, which everyone agrees with. But now it’s a hostile movement that doesn’t respect men and masculinity at all. Anyone can see that but they think it’s OK. Who needs masculinity anymore right? :)

        • ndru@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          29 days ago

          Feminism is not single coherent ideology with a linear development. It’s a movement with numerous offshoots who disagree vehemently with each other. There are anti-trans feminists, and there are feminists that are indeed hostile towards men.

          The vast majority of feminists I’ve encountered in my actual life - not online - just want rights for women in a world in which the global majority are still denied basic autonomy.

          • 1984@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            29 days ago

            I think its different in different countries too, so this topic will definently divide people. Depending on where your country is on the feminism scale, it may just have started fighting for equal rights, or it may have gone way too far in the female direction, and started attacking masculinity and pushing down men for doing ordinary masculine things like watching a woman or talking to a woman.

            Women don’t stop wanting more control over men’s behavior once they have equal rights. It becomes about controlling men’s behavior so it suits the woman. Things like thinking guys are creeps for watching a woman (unless he is attractive, then its fine). The woman decides if he is attractive and therefore if he is a creep or not.

  • velma@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    The production in question is an adaptation of “A Room of One’s Own,” a book by the legendary English author and feminist Virginia Woolf. According to the Teatre Raval, planned promotional posts about the show were blocked on both Instagram and Facebook, likely by an automated content moderation system.

    After reaching out to Meta about why the promo campaign had been stomped out, the company replied that “any mention of civil rights, feminism or social reform are usually classified as ‘social topics’ by our automatic system,” and therefore rejected.

    According to the Guardian, the company then cryptically recommended the Raval remove “key words” related to social activism, so the promo campaign can pass the automated censor — though the company failed to explain what, exactly, its content system objected to.

    ”We don’t know if the publicity has been rejected because of the name of Virginia Woolf or because of the word feminism, or both,” Clara Sanchis, who stars in the one-woman show told the Spanish newspaper La Vanguardia, per the Guardian, which translated the comments.

    “In any case, it’s a way of erasing from the map advances that have taken centuries to achieve,” Sanchis continued. “We have given social media unlimited power and every day we can see how dangerous this is. It’s bias and manipulation.”

    It’s not going to stop at Meta just like it did not stop at Roe v Wade being overturned.

    I’m sick of men telling me that I’m overreacting about these issues.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      30 days ago

      I’m sick of men telling me that I’m overreacting about these issues.

      The ones telling you that you’re over reacting are the ones who have a vested interest in your downfall

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      30 days ago

      Yepppp, where meta goes rightwards other social media sites follow. And many of them are run by misogynists

  • HerbGrower@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Oh so they are capable of banning the ones they don’t like, just not the ones that are actively harmful and illegal?

    Fuck off meta. Really wish more people would stop using their shit. Shun those who work for them while you are at it. You work for the nonce glasses company? Eww

    • Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      30 days ago

      the problem is people are so addicted to it, at least in my province. They don’t want to hear about any alternative that would require the smallest effort. In the 80’s, Dead Kennedys made an album called “Give me convenience or give me death”. I took me decades to realize how accurate this title was for depicting the world we live in.

      • obvs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        29 days ago

        I stopped using Facebook years ago.

        Before there were viable alternatives.

        The idea that you need Facebook because there aren’t significant alternatives is just not true.

      • Kristell@herbicide.fallcounty.omg.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        30 days ago

        The problem is that this isn’t like Microsoft Office > LibreOffice/OnlyOffice/whatever. You’re not on Facebook for Facebook, you’re on Facebook for the people there. It’s why I have a lot of issues getting off of YouTube. I’m not on YouTube because their interface is nice, I’m on YouTube because the people I want to watch don’t post shit elsewhere. It’s a cycle, to get users we need stuff, and for stuff we need creators, and for creators we need users. When it comes to online platforms we don’t need an alternative to YouTube, we need an alternative to Markiplier, which is harder to come up with.

        If you can get your friends, and family onto Friendica that would help quite a bit. The problem is that using a new server is hard for the end user (I would know, all of my fediverse presence is on servers I host), and telling someone “Use Friendica” is like telling someone to “Use email”. Get a Friendica/Mastodon/Whatever server, and keep it in your back pocket. Give them a link to that server, not to Friendica/Mastodon/Whatever as a whole.

        Admittedly I don’t know how hard it is to stop using Facebook because I stopped using Facebook right after they took away the chronological timeline, and stopped using Messenger a few years ago. But spending some time to get a timeline together that you can boost will help any new users you recruit. Crucially, to promote viable alternatives, you need to be part of the viable alternatives, otherwise you’re just someone telling someone to jump into something new with 0 guidance, which is a good way to have them leave.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        No alternative is viable if no one uses it.

        The network effect is real, and it’s what lets these fascism pushers stay top of mind at all times.

      • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        30 days ago

        “Let’s have tacos tonight.” “Nah Im not feeling tacos.” “OK let’s get Chinese food.” “Nah i don’t want Chinese food.” "…ok… let’s make soup. " “Nah I don’t want soup tonight.”

        • undrwater@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          30 days ago

          This made me thoughtful and laugh at the same time, thank you.

          You’re right, of course. People prefer centralized platforms, and we “nerds” prefer decentralized ones.

          There are no alternatives.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        30 days ago

        The viable alternative is nothing.

        Because no one gives a shit about you (general you, not specific at BitsAndBites), or about what you say. You use it cause you’re addicted to performing for people you dont even talk to or like, because no one can actually maintain hundreds, if not thousands of connections like you collect on facebook, most of whom don’t even give a shit about you. its just a mutual masturbation session, only instead of jerking each others dicks off, your jerking eachother off with pointless likes.

        All social media is, is a means of generating profit from mental illness, and manufacturing mental illness for profit.

        • Drusas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          30 days ago

          You use it cause ~you’re addicted to performing for people you dont even talk to or like~ it’s the only place to get and share updates from your extended family

          • Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            30 days ago

            Holy shit send them a text ask them how they’re doing, maybe even a phone call. You don’t have to choose to give mark zuckerberg a monopoly on your family’s stories and memories.

            • Drusas@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 days ago

              All of them. At once. Facebook is where older people share updates that they don’t want to have to share with every single person in their life individually.

              I already have individualized communications.