• 1995ToyotaCorolla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Honestly amazing that these tech companies are able to make a building full of computers look like an open strip mine. They don’t even try to beautify the campuses or anything, just bare dirt and ponds full of acrid water. I live in taconite country and have seen active mining operations put in more care for the communities they invade then big tech does

    • potpotato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I don’t agree with how data centers are being built out, but I also don’t think your assessment is accurate. The New Albany and Fayetteville sites look to preserve most of the existing trees. Abilene and Sandstone appear to be active construction.

  • Bieren@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    To be fair. This isn’t an AI issue. Or a data center issue. It’s an everywhere issue. If there is a plot of land, it will be leveled and something will be built. Strip mall. Gas station. Houses. So many houses. It’s never ending. If that piece of land can make money, it will be clear cut and built on.

    • velma@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      The use of passive voice throughout your comment is almost impressive.

      What do those other buildings provide that data centers don’t?

      • Bieren@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        I get what you are saying. I know. But that strip mall is gonna have a parking lot the size Montana. It will contain 2 mattress stores, a noodle place and a denture store. The noodle place will go out of business and shutdown. The other 3 will remain open for the next 12 years by magic or something, cause you never see a single person there. We need housing yes. Affordable housing. The houses that the forest was cleared for will be 500k plus, contractor grade, where you get to choose from 3 designs, and its built off a two lane road that is never improved to handle a 1000 home neighborhood. At least, that is all that is popping up around me.

        Id rather have the forest any day.

      • Brosplosion@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        Not OP, but houses provide housing. Strip malls provide spaces for local businesses. Data center literally provide nothing to the local community they are built in other than stress on existing utilities. It’s not like factories of yore where 1k jobs would be created and lives were built around it.

      • nitroemdash@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Solar panels produce 36.6% more energy in space than on earth at noon with ideal atmospheric conditions (clear sky). As it’s not always clear and not always day on earth, so I suspect the difference to be 300-400%, plus storage inconvenience.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Because solar on the roof won’t even be noticable against their power footprint. Given current practices, each square foot of a datacenter would need about 1,000 times more square footage worth of solar.

        It’s just that somehow if they get to go to space, they decide they suddenly just need like two servers in a ‘datacenter’ instead of thousands. And they need to go to space because Elon says (checks notes) that it’s too hard to make more natural gas turbine parts…

        • WesternInfidels@feddit.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Because solar on the roof won’t even be noticable against their power footprint. Given current practices, each square foot of a datacenter would need about 1,000 times more square footage worth of solar.

          But (as I’m sure you realize) this would mean every watt from on-premises solar could get put to use immediately, no batteries, no power-grid buy-back schemes. Making those solar panels an unusually good investment.

          Unless they’re not planning to keep it running for very long.

          It smells un-serious, somehow.

        • nfh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          2 days ago

          Even if it’s nowhere near a majority of the power, I’m surprised passive cooling from solar plus some electricity isn’t worthwhile enough to be universal. It’s a small impact, but also cheap enough it’ll pay for itself, and many orders of magnitude more efficient than trying to get a datacenter into space, and figure out how to cool it

          • turtlesareneat@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            Especially since they’re looking for space for solar installations, farmers have started installing them, power companies and coops. Seems financially stupid to leave that much space unused when solar farms would go right on top.

            • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              And especially because elon owns a solar panels company and he loves to transfer money between his companies

        • Fishnoodle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          Just like vaccines, some things need to be done in scale to reach their true effectiveness.

          That one facility will always be as net negative for the grid. But with panels on all the other buildings in the area that aren’t a power sap, it would be significantly better.

          We’re getting to the point where roof top solar is relatively cheap and worth the effort. I mean, there’s fucking fields near me that they clear cut and put ground based solar panels on, and it was profitable enough for the farmers to lease the land, and the company that owns the panels to get their nut. And a lot of those field based panel arrays are equivalent to, if not smaller than the massive Amazon warehouses we have nearby.

          If large corporations pay their fucking taxes and did their fair share of infrastructure investment we wouldn’t even be having a conversation about global warming or about where we’re going to get energy for fucking stupid worthless data centers. The energy is in the fucking sky it’s free goddamn giant nuclear reactor you just need to put panels on top of shit to harvest it.

          • freebee@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            At this point in climate change time, it is criminal neglect to 1. clear a forest, 2. build a big steel/concrete box on it and then 3. don’t even put a green roof or solar roof. We need to be heading towards climate trials and people deciding this crap today still in companies with a near infinite capital available deserve life in jail without airco.

      • SparroHawc@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        As long as they continue to spout pie-in-the-sky for-realsies gonna-be-fantastic totally-not-gonna-fall-apart-like-half-Elon’s-schemes plans for the future, they don’t have to spend ANY money on stuff like ground-based solar panel arrays, and they get more investors who get suckered by the pitch too!

      • Flames5123@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Devils advocate, I don’t agree with this, but maybe because first to market and innovating quickly gets more money? The solar panels would be a bigger up front cost (they gotta make sure the building is rated for it, buy a bunch of wires if it’s out in a field, etc) than just paying the city for 6 months-3 years of electricity vs how much the return will be in the timed bubble we have?

        I don’t think that’s a good business decision unless you think what you’re making isn’t going to last…. But maybe they know the bubble will pop and don’t wanna invest long term? It’s just dumb or evil.

    • ghurab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      The roof might be used for cooling, which is probably be a better use of space for a datacenter roof.

  • stevles@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 days ago

    There is no greater threat to humanity, than humanity itself. There is so much evidence of this throughout history, and yet we have collectively learnt nothing from it. As a species, we are the most destructive force in existence, and time and time again the value of the almighty dollar, that we ourselves have created, is put first above all else. Even the existence of the only known planet that we can successively survive on, is put behind the priority of the dollar.

    On the plus side, at least there’s no bloody rain in Melbourne this weekend!

  • PositiveNoise@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    To me, the problem seems to be bad regulators. They could have mandated that data centers have solar panels on their roof. They could have mandated a certain amount of greenery around the warehouse, so that the area was less impactful. It’s been a known issue that unregulated Capitalism will cause mass destruction quite frequently for decades if not centuries. You can’t expect every business to ‘do the right thing’ every time…that would be stupidly optimistic of regulators.

  • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s a bit unfortunate the second xAI is taken in the winter, so we can’t really see how much of the trees are gone, but looks like a lot.

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Just zoom I’m, you can see where it is bare ground and how winter pic still has trees in the other areas. Don’t go just by colour itself but the shapes of the masses

      • BougieBirdie@piefed.blahaj.zone
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I can’t tell from this far away, but if those trees are deciduous then they lose their leaves in the cold weather

        So a winter photo might not be as good of a comparison as a summer photo because even if there were exactly as many trees in each photo, the winter one would look like there are fewer.

        • PumaStoleMyBluff@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          You can still see the trees on the left and the right 🤔 like outer border is identical, just a swath cut through the middle. Season can have an effect but it seems pretty clear here.

        • Einskjaldi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          In that region they typically hold on to their leaves and they slowly come off but keep most of it through the winter, depending on wind to blow them off.

  • fum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    This behaviour is exactly why parts of the world are literary on fire right now. It’s not just the loss of trees, its the other impacts of these data centers too, such as increased use of fossil fuels.

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      And the sprawl encouraged by such development leads to a longer interface between wild and built environments which is more space to defend from wildfires

    • HuePony@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Forest fire always was a thing even without humans. It even heals forest from old trees that blocks space for new one

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Some day, the people may rise up… And maybe all of these will burn.

    I like to think the employees will do it. Who knows, though…

    I just know it needs to be done.

    • quakki@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      the people can just stop using the services to get rid of these. there is no need to get violent lol

  • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago
    1. Summer vs winter picture, not a very honest take

    2. It would look the same for any commercial building - a warehouse, shopping center (would be even worse), etc.

    No need to be disingenuous, it just weakens the argument and gives someone who disagrees with you valid ammunition.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      I guess the point would be what does the local area get in exchange for losing their forest?

      A lot of other developments at least provide the local populace some service or jobs. These are just “give me your land, your power, and water and we will use it to advance our business interests and do nothing for the locals”, oh and btw, give us a tax break for the privilege of having us build a datacenter in your area.

      Now I’m being bombarded by ads saying ‘um, actually datacenters give you tons of permanent jobs and makes power cheaper’, so they are just flat out lying instead of actually doing anything to make it worth the local community. Well, except key people on local town councils who somehow end up with NDAs forbidding them from disclosing what conversations they are having with these developers…

    • Annoyed_🦀 @lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Summer vs winter picture, not a very honest take

      How so? Not like the data center will wilted away after the winter and trees grow back on spring.

      • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        At least here in the US the people arguing against data centers are also against housing developments and want to reduce urban sprawl (by say tearing down all the empty malls and building apartments there for example). At least that’s what it seems like to me, someone against the never ending suburbia.