Crawl: Stone Soup is an excellent traditional roguelike. No metagame. Every run is independent (aside from occasionally running into ghosts of past characters, but those have been way toned down in recent versions)
The biggest threat is hubris and inattention. I lose a lot of characters from stubbornly just attacking them instead of actually using resources.
I hate the US healthcare system. I’ve had the same doctor for like my entire adult life, but my current shit insurance says they’re “out of network”. And I can’t figure out what I need to do to get a weird skin-thing looked at. If it’s cancer and it goes badly because of this delay, I am going to be furious and then probably dead.
How about labor getting their fair share of loss if business they work in fails. No? Why not?
If the business fails, the workers lose their income and their shares are just as worthless as anyone else. The workers should have shares. (Or some other mechanism so there’s not a handful of fat cats living a life of luxury due to the labor of many others)
The person who started the business can always go work somewhere else. It’s not like he’s put to death. And if the concern is that “someone who loses their money might suffer and die” then we should fix that problem more generally, because there are many other ways to end up there.
And you haven’t proposed any better system. It’s always the same when I ask that question.
That wasn’t the question or the point. A fairer system off the top of my head is profit sharing with a union. But that wasn’t the point.
If someone says “X is bad for A, B, C” saying that Z isn’t better is not a rebuttal. We haven’t gotten that far. We’re trying to reach agreement that X is bad. Then we can talk about replacing or fixing it. Maybe Z does suck.
It’s a common mistake. Someone will be like “windows sucks” and someone will be like “well apple is expensive”, just blazing by on that express train of thought. Take the local train.
But I’m still in favor of capitalism. Because my parents and grandparents lived in socialism and told me how their life looked like.
So you have generational trauma skewing your views.
Long story short: It was an inescapable poverty and no free speech.
Free speech has absolutely nothing to do with this economic system. And let me remind you of all the people fired because their employer didn’t like what they said, where they risk falling into poverty and worse.
The way capitalism manifests in the US is a set of tiny tyrannies. Your boss tells you when you can piss, what you can wear, what you can say in public. Maybe you don’t care because you are the boss. You give your people time off?
I am a capitalist. I run super small business. If you think it’s sunshine and rainbow, you’re sorely mistaken. It’s more work, there’s no pay guarantee, competition is ALWAYS ahead of you, in capital, scale and know-how, you’re sweating shitless on any change in costs, because raising prices always comes at the risk of losing customers, meanwhile you’re required to do shit ton of government mandated paperwork.
And the dream is for you to make it so big that you don’t have to work anymore. Your business expands. You buy out or out compete everyone else. You sit back and let other people work. Then you raise prices, lower wages, and buy a private jet.
The end state of capitalism is a rich asshole who doesn’t work, and a shitty world for everyone else. Maybe it takes years. But enshittification is pretty widely understood.
Maybe a worker owned collective would enshittify, too. But as a small consolation, you’d at least have thousands of rich people instead of a billionaire.
Now, I wrote this on the toilet so it’s not the most coherent or polished. I appreciate you taking the time to go back and forth even though we disagree.
Failing businesses is irrelevant to the argument that labor is entitled to a fair share of what it creates.
Your analogy to generalizations and an old timey Godwin’s law is laughable.
The capitalist system “works” at tremendous cost to many people. Many such systems work. Chattel slavery would “work”.
And you haven’t clarified why you’re so eager to defend this system. Are you a capitalist? Do you employ people while keeping the bulk of the profits?
I don’t think I can take you seriously
VC funding isn’t free money. Usually you have to have alredy prospering business for anyone to even talk with you. Companies like WeWork or more recently AI companies are extremely rare exception.
lol. Many people get funding for their companies because of their connections. Zoom famously got funding even though the investors thought it was stupid to try to address what they saw as a solved problem, but he was their friend so they gave him a few million dollars.
The last business I worked for started with his daddy’s money, which (surprise) came from previous capitalist exploits. The first one was similar.
Why not?
Capitalists have done incalculable harm to our environment, society, and individuals. They don’t need your defense. They have almost all the money and power.
I had an interview a few weeks ago (one of like 3 this year) where it was revealed they still write these.
They asked how we kept all the stuff organized at my last job. All the cucumber stuff. I said we just kept the tests next to the file they’re testing- foo.py has a sibling test_foo.py- and we didn’t find much value in adding extra layers. If you want to test the API returns 403 when you request another user’s file, you can just write like
def test_403_when_requesting_other_user_file() -> None:
response = requests.get("whatever/etc")
assert response.status_code == 403
You can be pretty to the point.
We used docstrings to explain non-obvious things. Swagger shows the API docs in a nice webpage for anyone curious and authorized.
He wasn’t impressed and I didn’t make it to the next round.
I kind of intensely dislike that whole… natural language wrapper thing. It adds at least one whole extra layer to maintain for no real benefit. No one non technical is going to read it. If they were some magic competent person, they could just read regular doc strings.
VC funding.
Also why are you so invested in defending capitalists?
The owner also gets a wage and benefits while the process is running.
And much of the time, they’re spending VC money. Minimal personal risk.
And even so, that doesn’t justify the owner keeping almost all of the proceeds. I don’t care if they put their life savings into it. Labor built it.
There are probably a lot of representatives I wouldn’t recognize, even if I know their name and deal.
But on the flipside, it’s hard for me to stay concentrated while at home.
While I believe that is true for you, I don’t believe it justifies the lost time, health, and environmental damage of mandating in-office for everyone.
The office is super distracting for many people.
The laid off workers also suffer the loss, typically.
Furthermore, I don’t think “he gambled” compellingly makes this system fair or good.
Oh, I read your thing backwards then.
I can’t imagine wanting to go into the office on the regular. The commute. The lost time (can math out to like a 20% pay cut, if you spend two hours a day traveling + getting ready). The sickness. The lack of control over environment (temperature, sound).
Can’t relate to it. And I’m a very social person that likes interacting with people.
Every day I’m a little surprised there’s no news story of some workers beating their “no, you have to come into the office” manager to death. They’ve got means, motive, and opportunity, and it’s extra funny because if they’d been allowed to work at home they wouldn’t have at least two of those.
But really we’re ruled by the worst of us. Cowards and fools.
Maybe unionizing is safer than hitting the decision makers with an office chair while screaming “you made this possible” until they can’t even cry anymore.
Working from home doesn’t appeal to the emotional needs of fragile managers.
That’s one of the core injustices of capitalism.
Rich person says “Build a thing”
Workers design, research, and build the thing.
Rich person keeps the profits.
Almost everywhere I’ve applied or know people at is frothing at the mouth for AI. Interestingly, I met a guy last weekend that works for a big video game studio you’ve heard of, and he was like “everyone here hates AI. Management on down”. So that was nice to hear.
. He’s not allowed to say, “It’s not.” Only positive feedback. They need to justify its continued use, so he needs to find benefits to report to the higher-ups.
Those higher-ups should not be in charge.
This feels like the emperor’s new clothes, except no one listens to the children pointing out the folly.
I was outside the city a couple weeks ago and saw a lot of maga stuff. Maybe I should get like stickers or business cards for this site to leave places like that.
A mixture of stupidity and cruelty. Those things usually go together. Also so much racism, which is a subcategory of stupid and cruel.
There are a lot of people who would rather personally suffer and die than see a black person have something nice. That’s been festering here for decades.