• Noobnarski@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Agriculture is already somewhat unnatural, so I guess a “natural” life would be hunter gatherers.

        • Noobnarski@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Somewhat yes, nature usually tries to adapt to the environment, we are adapting the environment to us.

          I haven’t seen any other animal building roads and factories and cities.

        • silasmariner@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Buddy, what is natural about me, a person who has never met you, talking to you, a person I have never met. How the hell doss that make any sense. Fuckin’ superpowers m8. All up in this gadget.

      • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        oh I see, so if you aren’t a roving band of stone age people, then it’s unnatural?

        and are these societies also matriarchal or something too, because you know the patriarchy is unnatural as well?

        • Noobnarski@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Kind of, humans were hunter gatherers for so long that we evolved to be good at it, so I guess that’s what would be natural for us.

          Agriculture and our current life hasn’t been around long enough for us to properly adapt to it.

          I have no idea if those societies were patriarchal or matriarchal, I would imagine both happened or maybe even some sort of equality, if you want to know more about this go ask an expert in the field.

          But in the end I don’t care what you do, I just continued your argument.