• Scratch@sh.itjust.works
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    “I can’t go outside without wearing a head covering.”

    “Head coverings are now illegal.”

    “Now I can’t go outside.”

    This makes the world more fair and equitable.

    Here’s a wild idea, instead of making clothing illegal, why don’t we make coercing people into a manner of dress illegal?

    • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m having difficulty parsing this. Are you saying “we should ban religions from coercive headgear” or “we shouldn’t ban clothing”? Cause those are contradictory positions and I’m not certain what you’re trying to say (which is probably entirely on me)

      • stickyprimer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        We shouldn’t ban clothing. We should ban the coercion of anyone to wear particular clothing.

        There’s no contradiction here.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Exactly. I knew a woman in college who wore hijab. Apparently in high school she didn’t, and her family always treated it as her choice. She chose it because of the racism and anti muslim mistreatment she faced making her embrace it as a fuck you to the mistreatment. It made sense to me, though it saddened me how much harassment she had faced. How she dressed wasn’t my problem, and I was always more focused on the brain under her hijab than the hair.

          I dislike such cultural expressions of modesty, and I worry about cultural pressure towards them. They remind me too much of my baptist cousins. But I firmly oppose the government or society intervening in how people dress. So long as every person old enough to choose for themselves is permitted to, my opinions are my problem.

          • stickyprimer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Yes we sit here in our western comfort zone judging Muslims. We think: the women shouldn’t have to cover up to avoid inflaming the sexual passions of men. The men should just control themselves! Meanwhile western women are hammered by the male gaze all day long and assaulted with sexual violence and killed all too commonly. Yet we somehow can’t imagine why a reasonable woman might actually want to cover up, and consider that safer, more freeing. And then we go and ban her cover. It’s just gob smacking blind stupid.

            • Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              14 hours ago

              You say that as if covering up made a women safer and not just as much under the ‘male gaze’. Muslim women are also sexually assaulted, sometimes with the pertetrator knowing that she would face more reprecussions than he would if she complained.

        • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah, but that doesn’t really clarify, though. Does that mean that a woman could wear a hijab or burqa under your rule?

            • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              2 days ago

              My mother was undergoing some weird medical treatment that made her skin super sensitive to UV radiation. She was in full sleeves and a vest and gloves and a hat and facescarf and everything covered everywhere. I sincerely recommended to her a hijab or burqa because it would make going out easier. A couple main articles of clothing, maybe sunglasses and gloves, and she would be fine. Unfortunately the religious element of it put her off too much, but clothes are clothes.