You got to be out of your mind to reach those limits on any social media platform.
TBF some local media is still on there, the only guy who covers city council meetings for Oakland (nearly 1/2 a million people), and he does it by live tweating the whole meeting, easily over 50 a day.
Yeah, nah. Live tooting an event it would be easy to exceed those numbers. Used to do it all the time, back in the day.
You clearly haven’t seen cult leader Eliezer Yudkowsky’s Twitter history.
Or cult leader Donald Trump
You got to be out of your mind to be on Xitter at all.
Who tf gives a frogs fat ass?
Fuck X (Meta and TikTok), anyone who’s still on any of these platform can fuck off anyway.
Furries likely would give a frog a fat ass. And it would be more enjoyable then anything on twitter.
🥵
Frogs no fur tho…
I’ve heard of furries. I’ve heard of scalies. What would you call a frog person? A slimy?
With the hard ‘y’ ? That’s their word
You mean twitter, the neo-nazi pedo shithole?
It’s called Xitter now. Pronounced with sh.
Habibi, if you need to post more than 50 times a day on X you have a larger problem.
50 posts a day should be a premium feature. That alone is kinda ridiculous.
50 posts a day should trigger red flag laws and a mental health councillor knocking on your door.
I don’t know who or what a Habibi is but as others have mentioned, live tweeting an event will easily get you past that limit
On the other hand, not livetweeting an event saves you both money and a lot of effort.
It’s crazy but understandable that media outlets started calling Twitter “X”. It’s batshit bonkers that they’re calling fleeced users “verified”, as if the word didn’t have prior meaning and it isn’t still widely used to this day (and long into the future)
Regrettably, I accidentally implied that the linked slop generator is a media outlet. Point still stands though.
Oh no, this will affect my 0 posts per day i make there though.
During my first year of college, I had a writing class. The professor made us join this new micro-blog platform. I tweeted a few times, which were part of some of the assignments. I thought the idea of <140 characters to be interesting. Paying for that sounds hilarious.
I’ll just leave this here, from The New Yorker, titled “L.P.D.: Libertarian Police Department”
they ruined Twitter the moment they added images, and then it got worse with videos, the 2018 algorithm switch, and long tweets.
when your app is an everything app it’s a nothing app
when your app is an everything app it’s a nothing app
Such a perfect way to describe it!
“People still using X”.
Twitter was always about limiting yourself, originally to posts about as long as a text. That was kinda the point. They increased the post length a while ago, but as a long time fan of long form forum conversations, I never saw much point in Twitter. Then this crazy nutjob bought it and it appealed to me even less. Still, these limits seem reasonable as he paid so much for it and it hasn’t made him a profit. So yeah, I think anyone who wants to use it more than that should maybe pay… or find another service to post on.
Maybe this will push people to quit, finally. Or to subscribe. I don’t know, I used Twitter a tiny bit back the day, but I left and never looked back when Elon bought it. Just like when Reddit dropped their API support. Recognize when a platform is trying to enshittify and get out because you’re the product, not the customer being served.
You guys are still talking about Xitter?
My first thought as well, didn’t everyone leave that place years ago?
Have to love the narrative spin, they are placing a post limit on free accounts; as far as I’m aware, ‘verified’ accounts are just paid accounts now, right?
