cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/43533515

When will we simply accept that it’s a bubble and move on, instead of pouring a relentless amount of resources into it.

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    They told us years ago that AI would transform the job landscape within 6 months. This is starting to feel like Elons musks full self driving. Which he still hasnt effing delivered. Industry con artists like Musk and Altman should be in jail for defrauding investors.

  • jtrek@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I’m so tired of hearing about AI at work. They don’t have the fundamentals of software development down - no tests. no linters. no automatic deployment. Dependency management is a joke. Code reviews are a rubber stamp. They only this quarter stopped people from SSH’ing onto the prod machine and making live, not in source control, changes. But they want everyone to start leveraging AI. Spending untold piles of time and money on it.

    It would be far cheaper and more cost-effective to spend like, a week, on software development fundamentals.

    Meanwhile, I’ve stubbornly forced my way through various processes and red tape to get a bare minimum of checks that run automatically on PR. This week it found someone had pushed a script with a fatal syntax error, gotten it reviewed, approved, and merged. My check goes live and flags this before it’s in prod. No one cares. Management still just wants to talk about AI.

    • GrindingGears@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      99.999999999999998898999999999899% of what’s described by the executives at my work isn’t AI either, it’s either formulas or macros. Which have existed since what, the 80s?

      Just absolutely goes to show you that these idiots have no clue, and are just throwing shit at the wall and hoping something sticks. Aka just another Tuesday.

      Eat the rich. Eat the executives.

      Fuck AI

    • fiat_lux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      11 hours ago

      There’s no reward for preventing fires, they only care if you put a large one out. It’s immensely frustrating.

      • MIDItheKID@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Truth. I’ve been rewarded for putting out fires that I caused. I find the best thing to do in these situations is to keep my stupid mouth shut.

      • Cort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 hours ago

        You might get more traction if you frame it as “I caught Gary trying to do an arson” instead of “I prevented a fire”

        • fiat_lux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I’m going to substitute the name Claude for no reason in particular, but I might just take that feedback on board…

    • EveningPancakes@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 hours ago

      We had a town hall at my company today and they demo’d their new AI product. It looked and sounded impressive, until you realized it wasn’t the actual product but a Figma demo. If this thing ever sees the light of day, and it actually works without hallucinating bullshit data points, I’ll eat my socks.

  • matlag@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    11 hours ago

    That’s probably because we’ve not poured enough money in it yet. 1 or 2 more trillions and it will create growth like you’ve never seen before!

  • alekwithak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    111
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    It replaced jobs, used nonrenewable resources, oh and drove teenagers to suicide! It sounds to me like it was responsible for negative economic growth.

    • shrugs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Yeah, but on the other hand it sometimes answered questions correctly, when I have been too lazy to Google myself. So there is that

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Yeah. Obviously. There’s a phrase which gets misinterpreted very often. “The customer is always right”. People think it means if you go into Walmart, and try to buy a TV, and you say 480p is a higher resolution than 1080p, you’d be right. Because you’re the customer, and you’re always right, even if you’re wrong.

    That’s not what it means. It means if you go to a store and ask to buy a 480p TV, and they don’t have it, they lost a sale. The phrase really should be “The customer always dictates the market”.

    So when we look at AI, you ask “Ok, who’s using it?” and the answer is “Everybody hates it. Everybody resents it. But we’re being forced to use it, so it gets ‘used’ in a sense, but not willingly.”

    So if you have a product that nobody wants, and everybody is openly hostile towards, but you just keep forcing it down peoples throats, then yeah, you lose sales. Just ask Microsoft how Windows 11 adoption rates have been. I guess by definition, I am now a linux user. I still hate it. I have no idea how to do anything besides open a web browser. I wish I could do more with my own PC. It’s not linux that’s preventing me, it’s my own inability to understand things. By all means, I SHOULD be a windows user…but I’ll be damned if Microsoft is going to tell me HOW I can use my own PC that I paid for. Linux isn’t restricting me, but I still don’t know how to do it. I’m the example of why Windows 11 is failing, and it’s all because of policy regarding AI.

    If nobody wants your product, it will not contribute to growth. Go try standing on the sidewalk and selling a fat mans used gym socks for $200. Nobody will buy it. Nobody wants that. So it would be kind of weird if the 11 o clock news was surprised to report that the fat mans used gym sock market was not profitable. Yet that’s where we seem to be with AI right now. Media outlets are continually reporting that AI is not doing well, and every time they report it, they seem surprised.

    Literally all it would take for me to go back to Windows would be for them to release “WindowsXP12” It’s Windows 12, which is just Windows XP but with quality of life improvements, such as not limiting file sizes to 4GB, and allowing more than 16GB of ram, and being able to read more than 2TB hard drives. No AI, just WindowsXP exactly as you remember it, just built for the modern world. But Microsoft is too stubborn to do that. They’ve been baking in anti-customer features since Windows 7. So I guess by default I’m a linux user now.

  • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Wow, what a hitpiece, the only reason AI added “Basically Zero” to US Economic Growth last year is in the calculations for this article they deceptively subtracted costs from the revenue!!!

      • SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        The problem, as I see it, is they tried to START with intelligence.

        If it were programmed “properly” it would start dumb and LEARN from there but nobody wants to buy into that.

        So here we are.