I honestly am not sure where I’d stand on the EU as a good example of privacy. Unfortunately I don’t think the GDPR has been effective in retrospect. They’re at times hostile towards corporate spying, which is good. But, they’re extremely bullish on state spying and policing social media. They’re willing to outsource this to corporations sometimes too. It’s pretty good, or some countries are, if you want to stay private from US corporate interests but when it comes to themselves the EU seems to think your right to privacy online is an obstacle for them.

Dont hold up California as a good example of privacy when they’re leading the charge in demanding OS level age verification…

Twitter, for all its faults, proved that a lot of people online with strong opinions about US politics are located in India, Pakistan, and southeast Asia. In my opinion one of these is the likely origin.

It says $4 million per hour. It’s from one of those places that uses dots instead of commas.

But I do like to imagine someone in a really low CoL area like the Philippines wearing a tuxedo and laughing about how wealthy they are making $4/hr.

No, I just hate Palestine redditors lmao

One retired medicare recipient had $800m of our money (on paper, not in actual fact).

Like it or not, thinking that gays shouldn’t be thrown off of buildings but also disliking trans men in women’s bathrooms or whatever the current argument is about, just makes you a moderate.

Go practice it. Use your mirrors.

Okay but what armed conflict ever do you sit and wait for them to pick up ammo.

Interesting. Kind of like what’s happening in England.

Iran’s military would NEVER attack a defenseless target!

oh.

How about we destroy all of their military assets and if the soldiers don’t want to get killed, they can desert?

This is actually something I don’t understand when this argument is brought up. Havent they both been killing each other since well before the modern period?

It made a little more sense when the argument was that Hamas is bad, but that doesn’t justify collateral damage to Palestinian civilians when targeting them. But it seems to me the rhetoric I see often has switched to making excuses for Hamas, who directly tries to kill children whenever they get the opportunity, including putting their own Palestinian civilians in the line of fire to confuse attacks against them and get them killed as “martyrs”. Which they use to justify their actions, even though they caused it.

I don’t see how Israel’ careless around getting noncombatants killed justifies deliberately targeting civilians, which Hamas does constantly, or doing things like putting a rocket launcher on top of a hospital just so it looks bad for Israel when they destroy it. It’s not like Hamas wants a peaceful two-state solution and Israel just isn’t playing along. And theres not a lot of anti-Hamas sentiment in Gaza since they get murdered by Hamas, and they did vote them in in the first place.

She hosted Motaz Azaiza, the “journalist” who frequently praises Hamas, and was present with Hamas at the October 7th attack itself. So I correct myself, he only might have participated in directly killing civilians and children, but he was at least hanging out with his friends when they were doing that.

She hosted Motaz Azaiza, the “journalist” who frequently praises Hamas, and was present with Hamas at the October 7th attack itself. So I correct myself, he only might have participated in directly killing civilians and children, but he was at least hanging out with his friends when they were doing that.

She hosted Motaz Azaiza, the “journalist” who frequently praises Hamas, and was present with Hamas at the October 7th attack itself. So I correct myself, he only might have participated in directly killing civilians and children, but he was at least hanging out with his friends when they were doing that.

“The Israelis hit civilians when destroying the rocket launcher we put on top of a hospital, so it’s okay for us the paraglide into a music concert and just start killing and raping”

Remember the guy at Autozone who stood there insisting your car needs four spark plugs, even after you told him you have a V6? Because “the computer says so right here”?

I wonder what even the non-schizophrenic ones will do with AI.

Removed by mod

A lot of EVs are currently advertising charge times of 30 minutes from 15% to 90%. Furthermore:

If theres a line for the charging station, everybody is gonna take 30 minutes, so you could realize you have a 2 hour wait.

If the battery is hot, it can take longer. If you just got off the highway, it could add another 15-30 minutes while the battery cools off.

Might be that they’re finally realizing you don’t need to be in-office, but to them that means you really should be in Punjab.