• zeca@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    The article doesnt tell what edits he did to his posts to “poison” the ai…

    • faythofdragons@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      It did say in the article, its just not a satisfying answer lol

      To dupe the AI page, Collette previously explained that he noticed the AI was scraping his old content in chronological order, so he started editing each post right before it stole them.

      The scraper is just a repost bot, so it reposts the edit.

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    102
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    That’s pretty funny I guess. Though I’m shocked there’s enough users of Facebook still to even clock the story in the first place.

    • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I use it still, much to my chagrin, because my boomer and silent generation relatives use it, and it’s a convenient way to invite a lot of people to events and also find new events for my job.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m right there with you but unfortunately I must report that Facebook is still firmly entrenched in many circles. Like if my kid’s school posts some news on their website but not their facebook page, I’ve seen parents get riled up about that.

    • PineRune@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      63
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s all boomers now. I don’t think I know a single boomer that doesn’t use Facebook.

      • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        2 days ago

        The only reason most non-Boomers I know even have a Facebook account nowadays is using Messenger (though I do wish they’d move to something else)

        • WIZARD POPE💫@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah you got me. I’d move but I cannot be bothered to tell 50 sifferent people all of that in case they dont want to move because most people cannot be bothered to install a new app just for our once a month conversations.

          • Bob Robertson IX @discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            You just tell them when they message you why your reply took so long (“I don’t really use this app any more”) and how you prefer to be reached (“I’m on Signal, or you can text me”). And if it’s someone that doesn’t have your phone number, or you don’t want to have your phone number, then does it really matter if their messages to you are delayed?

      • Krudler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        I use FB exclusively to sell things. The reality is, young people use FB despite your arbitrary believe they don’t.

        People 30 and under are my biggest buyers.

      • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        How many are actually people though. You’re telling me over 1/8th the population is active users I just don’t believe that. If you told me a billion active bots, that I’d believe.

        • argarath@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Pretty much every Brazilian uses whatsapp, the rest of south America also uses it but I can’t guarantee it being that close to 100% like Brasil, then you have places like the EU, Asia (not in China, they have WeChat iirc) and I’d be surprised if it isn’t advice 1 billion people. Whatsapp didn’t take over the USA because you guys had sms for free, while most of the world didn’t, and after you hit a certain critical mass of users, even those who don’t want to (me) have to use it for work, friends and family. Everyone lives in their own bubbles, and the US has SEVERAL bubbles completely different from the rest of the world

        • GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          I know that big numbers are hard to imagine.

          And I know that imagining people other than yourself is hard.

          Doesn’t mean they don’t exist

    • titanicx@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I mean you also have to  remember to coun things like Instagram and what’s app all the other stuff that Facebook actually owns.

        • LikeableLime@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’ve heard that in many countries Meta subsidizes a lot of the cell plans and many regions still have metered data but Meta apps don’t count towards their data limits.

          I’m not sure the veracity of that, but it would explain the wide adoption and insistence on staying within the Meta ecosystem.

          • ChanchoManco@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Here WhatsApp data don’t count on the major cellphone provider, but it doesn’t even need it because nearly all of the people use it.

          • TisI@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            For my country it’s not just Meta apps, but all the major social networks (Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, Tiktok, YouTube) but it’s just certain plans that offer this.