Maven (famous)@lemmy.zip to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 10 个月前Square!lemmy.zipimagemessage-square138fedilinkarrow-up11.31Karrow-down136
arrow-up11.28Karrow-down1imageSquare!lemmy.zipMaven (famous)@lemmy.zip to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 10 个月前message-square138fedilink
minus-squareRememberTheApollo_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up149·edit-210 个月前Kinda forgot the sides being parallel part. Like missing a step in assembling IKEA furniture, its not gonna turn out right.
minus-squareSomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up84·10 个月前You don’t normally need to specify that the sides are parallel if you specify four right angles.
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18arrow-down2·10 个月前Also pretty sure definition of a shape requires only one enclosed or contiguous area.
minus-squareangrystego@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up26arrow-down2·10 个月前This one is enclosed and contiguous though, the lines of the triangle end where the circular line starts. (The rest is just a drafting residue.)
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down15·10 个月前No, it is 2 contiguous regions. The line of separation is the bounding line of a “shape.” Otherwise, the entire whitespace outside of the region is also part of the shape, as is anything it touches.
minus-squareThreeme2189@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down5·10 个月前OK, imagine the space outside of the shape is black, or see through or whatever.
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down9·edit-210 个月前Well then the line of separation means nothing and then you’ve lost two right angles to the contiguous void.
minus-squareThreeme2189@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down4·10 个月前Why? Does a cube floating in the void not have angles?
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down9·10 个月前Without a distinction of where the cube begins or ends it does not because there is no cube and there are no angles.
minus-squareStopJoiningWars@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·10 个月前Removed by mod
minus-squareThreeme2189@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down2·10 个月前The cube begins where the void ends and ends where the void begins.
minus-squareKlear@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·edit-210 个月前Fun fact - there are no actual cubes anywhere in the universe. All geometric shapes are an abstraction. There are no cubes and no angles, so that checks out.
minus-squareangrystego@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·10 个月前The angle of the triangle that protrudes into the circular part is not a right angle.
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·10 个月前My apologies you’re correct, you lose two right angles.
minus-squarenaught101@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·10 个月前Those arc sides are parallel in polar coordinates.
Kinda forgot the sides being parallel part. Like missing a step in assembling IKEA furniture, its not gonna turn out right.
You don’t normally need to specify that the sides are parallel if you specify four right angles.
Also pretty sure definition of a shape requires only one enclosed or contiguous area.
This one is enclosed and contiguous though, the lines of the triangle end where the circular line starts. (The rest is just a drafting residue.)
No, it is 2 contiguous regions. The line of separation is the bounding line of a “shape.”
Otherwise, the entire whitespace outside of the region is also part of the shape, as is anything it touches.
OK, imagine the space outside of the shape is black, or see through or whatever.
Well then the line of separation means nothing and then you’ve lost two right angles to the contiguous void.
Why? Does a cube floating in the void not have angles?
Without a distinction of where the cube begins or ends it does not because there is no cube and there are no angles.
Removed by mod
The cube begins where the void ends and ends where the void begins.
Fun fact - there are no actual cubes anywhere in the universe. All geometric shapes are an abstraction. There are no cubes and no angles, so that checks out.
The angle of the triangle that protrudes into the circular part is not a right angle.
My apologies you’re correct, you lose two right angles.
Those arc sides are parallel in polar coordinates.