Maven (famous)@lemmy.zip to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 9 个月前Square!lemmy.zipimagemessage-square138fedilinkarrow-up11.31Karrow-down136
arrow-up11.28Karrow-down1imageSquare!lemmy.zipMaven (famous)@lemmy.zip to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 9 个月前message-square138fedilink
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down15·9 个月前No, it is 2 contiguous regions. The line of separation is the bounding line of a “shape.” Otherwise, the entire whitespace outside of the region is also part of the shape, as is anything it touches.
minus-squareThreeme2189@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down5·9 个月前OK, imagine the space outside of the shape is black, or see through or whatever.
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down9·edit-29 个月前Well then the line of separation means nothing and then you’ve lost two right angles to the contiguous void.
minus-squareThreeme2189@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down4·9 个月前Why? Does a cube floating in the void not have angles?
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down9·9 个月前Without a distinction of where the cube begins or ends it does not because there is no cube and there are no angles.
minus-squareStopJoiningWars@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·9 个月前Removed by mod
minus-squareThreeme2189@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down2·9 个月前The cube begins where the void ends and ends where the void begins.
minus-squareKlear@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·edit-29 个月前Fun fact - there are no actual cubes anywhere in the universe. All geometric shapes are an abstraction. There are no cubes and no angles, so that checks out.
minus-squareangrystego@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·9 个月前The angle of the triangle that protrudes into the circular part is not a right angle.
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·9 个月前My apologies you’re correct, you lose two right angles.
No, it is 2 contiguous regions. The line of separation is the bounding line of a “shape.”
Otherwise, the entire whitespace outside of the region is also part of the shape, as is anything it touches.
OK, imagine the space outside of the shape is black, or see through or whatever.
Well then the line of separation means nothing and then you’ve lost two right angles to the contiguous void.
Why? Does a cube floating in the void not have angles?
Without a distinction of where the cube begins or ends it does not because there is no cube and there are no angles.
Removed by mod
The cube begins where the void ends and ends where the void begins.
Fun fact - there are no actual cubes anywhere in the universe. All geometric shapes are an abstraction. There are no cubes and no angles, so that checks out.
Ceci n’est pas une cube.
un* cube
un cub, une cube ;)
The angle of the triangle that protrudes into the circular part is not a right angle.
My apologies you’re correct, you lose two right angles.