You’re going to be happy about its application in biochemisty, genetics and astronomy. The volumes of data needing analysis are staggering, they’re just the perfect tasks for a robot brain.
Different than LLM. It’s other machine learning that are just using the AI label now to join the hype train. Not you same as what openAI and other AI companies are selling
ML has existed for a while, it has been in phone camera software for 7+ years now, for example. The way everything keeps getting lumped in this “AI” buzzword is hilarious.
Its an imperfect solution to an otherwise difficult task. I don’t know if anyone in science should be happy to use it since its results aren’t generally reproducible (a problem that already existed in biochemistry and genetics) but I could see it as being helpful at narrowing down datasets too large for people to handle.
I think with this epstein stuff too if the code and training data is not open there’s always a possibility AI has been set to filter something (such as Trump’s name).
You’re going to be happy about its application in biochemisty, genetics and astronomy. The volumes of data needing analysis are staggering, they’re just the perfect tasks for a robot brain.
Different than LLM. It’s other machine learning that are just using the AI label now to join the hype train. Not you same as what openAI and other AI companies are selling
ML has existed for a while, it has been in phone camera software for 7+ years now, for example. The way everything keeps getting lumped in this “AI” buzzword is hilarious.
Its an imperfect solution to an otherwise difficult task. I don’t know if anyone in science should be happy to use it since its results aren’t generally reproducible (a problem that already existed in biochemistry and genetics) but I could see it as being helpful at narrowing down datasets too large for people to handle.
I think with this epstein stuff too if the code and training data is not open there’s always a possibility AI has been set to filter something (such as Trump’s name).