• Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    31
    ·
    6 months ago

    When the other side are fascists openly running on a platform of doing fascists, needing to feel excited to fall in line and vote against them just makes you a fascist who thinks they can get bribes out of it.

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        6 months ago

        If you need more than “the fascists will win if we lose”, you’re a fucking fascist.

        Quit trying to make your wanting to be bribed to not let concentration camps happen some kind of moral cause or “well they should have made me want it more!” realist cynic take.

        If you need more than “the fascists will win if we lose”, you are a fucking fascist, and will be treated accordingly when the people who you’re actually hurting have their chance to reap justice for what you let be done to them.

        • Saint_La_Croix_Crosse@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I’d take it more seriously if the Democrats did or treated this as a serious issue. Instead they use it as an excuse to be 99% fascist and use it as an excuse to not campaign or take up popular issues because if they lose, it is because the voters didn’t fight to have 99% fascism instead of 100% fascism.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      6 months ago

      Who cares?

      What works is running charismatic candidates.

      So why not run charismatic candidates and beat the fascists?

        • running_ragged@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          30
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          6 months ago

          I can’t control how other people vote, but the party’s can. That’s their job.

          I knew the DNC fucked up when they tanked Bernie’s run.
          And look what we got.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            29
            arrow-down
            17
            ·
            6 months ago

            It’s insane that in my lifetime I’ve seen the Dem party at the point where they’ve completely given up on courting and just yell at people that they have to vote for them.

            Like, who the fuck is coming up with this strategy, and why is anyone listening to them?

            It just makes zero sense.

            • Mastengwe@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Naaah… a better strategy is to do absolutely nothing at all, suggest everyone do the same- and expect everything to magically change, right?

              We don’t need to be courted. This isn’t a fucking love story. We don’t need a thing handsome and charming hero to swash buckles. We need an effective politician.

              Everyone is always whining about Sanders all the time- he was NONE of those things. Ever.

              It he is an effective politician.

              So stop with the constant bullshit reasons to not vote. Especially this one. It’s probably the word you’ve come up with yet.

            • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              23
              ·
              6 months ago

              YOU DO HAVE TO VOTE FOR THEM

              THE OTHER OPTION IS LETTING FASCISM HAPPEN

              WE HAVE FOR OVER TWENTY YEARS NOW ACTUALLY BEEN IN A SITUATION WHERE, YES, GENUINELY, YOU DO ACTUALLY JUST HAVE TO VOTE FOR THEM

              GOOD PEOPLE DO NOT TO BE MADE TO BE EXCITED BY DOING THEIR DUTY TO PROTECT THE MOST VULNERABLE WHO CANNOT SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES

              YOU DO ACTUALLY JUST HAVE TO VOTE FOR THEM TO NOT BE AN AWFUL FUCKING HUMAN BEING WHO DESERVES SCORN FOR BEING FUCKING AWFUL

              • running_ragged@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                21
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                When you only have one choice, you don’t have a choice.

                Yea obviously we’re at the point where the only non fascist choice is to vote for an unpopular incumbent, but it seems like the choice has been completely removed from the democratic process in the US and you have to wonder how much of it is exactly by design, and whose.

                • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  to be honest, I’m not convicd Biden is not also fascist. look at his Immigration policies. How he supports Israel’s genocide. Sure, Trump is vastly more fascistic than Biden, no question there… but “lesser of two evils” bullshit is exactly how we got in this mess.

                • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  It’s by the design of the Democrats, though I think our current situation is an unintentional cascade effect.

                  It’s the result of one of the oldest election strategies in the world that remains incredibly popular for one simple reason: it’s easy and it works. “Vote for me because I’m not the other guy” is a much easier policy to convince people on than actually having any policies of your own.

                  For many years now Democrats all over the country have been funding the campaigns of the most unhinged and extremist of their opponents to set themselves up for an easy win - there was even a lady who wrote a book about her doing it, only to lose to that same extremist in the very next election.

                  And that’s why we find ourselves in the situation that we’re in. Because the Dems keep thinking that they can court some mythical moderate Republican voting block by propping extremists up as the nominees. But that doesn’t exist because the Republicans have always been voting against Dems rather than for people they like. Republicans don’t care if the nominee is Bush, Biden, Putin, or Stalin himself, risen from the grave to finally put an end to capitalism. So long as they have an R next to their name instead of a D, that’s who they’re voting for.

                • daltotron@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  When you only have one choice, you don’t have a choice.

                  damn, never thought about it like that, but that’s a pretty succinct way to put it

              • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                This you?

                Your approach isn’t working. It never works. Because all it does is makes people more defensive, and it divides the DNC even further. it just makes me roll my eyes and think “okay, boomer, time to change your diapers again.” And yes. I know that’s totally ageist of me, but frankly, at this point, I’m tired of it.

                • jumjummy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  So what are you suggesting come November? All I read when I see comments like yours is “I just want to complain and wish really hard that the Democrats had a unicorn for a candidate”.

                  Reality is there are only 2 choices in November, and one of those choices will lead this country directly into facism.

                • Mastengwe@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  People shouting at others not to vote don’t deserve to get their asses kissed. This isn’t grade-school where we are all supposed to be nice to the kids throwing temper tantrums so they’ll stop.

                  They’re showing their asses. They don’t get to whine when people start kicking.

                • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Maybe if y’all were capable of saying shit that didn’t instantly wanna make me pull my hair out at the sheer, oh I dunno draw a fucking deadly sin out of a hat at this point, I wouldn’t feel like y’all need the markdown equivalent of the gunnery sergeant hartman treatment to explain basic morals to you abject failures of human empathy.

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                12
                ·
                6 months ago

                But why are the uncharismatic conservative candidates the only other option when we know for a fact they’re not what Dem voters want?

                Why not run someone voters actually like and who will get the most votes?

                Why don’t you understand that gets the most votes for the Dem candidate?

                Although I would like to thank you for not insulting me this time, we’re making progress. Would all caps help you more? I know it’s easier for some to read so I can do that if you’re doing it so you can read easier.

                Depending on what you’re using you can make the text appear larger or a better font too.

                • someguy3@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  I notice you’re doing your one sentence per paragraph again.

                  Ok let’s go through this chronologically (not that I agree Biden is conservative, he’s center).

                  Bill Clinton: When you run against an incumbent (Bush senior) you run from the center. So that’s what he did.

                  Gore: After the population hopefully warmed up with Bill Clinton, he stuck his head out left with climate change. And bam he lost the election. Thanks 3rd party protest voters!

                  Obama: So guess what Obama learned? Don’t stick your head out. He ran on vague “hope”, hoping the ambiguity would be enough considering Bush’s disastrous wars. And he won.

                  Hillary Clinton: After the population hopefully warmed up with Obama, she stuck her head out just a tiny itty little bit with the Map Room to fight climate change. And guess what happened? Bam she lost. Thanks protest non-voters!

                  On to Biden. Just like Obama learned from Gore, Biden learned from Hillary that you don’t stick your head out left. And he was running against an incumbent, so once again when you do that you run center. He’s actually been governing more from the left, but he ran center.

                  And you’re amazed that they don’t run an extreme left platform? Every time they stick their head out a little itsy bitsy tiny bit left they lose. And the next guy learns to go to the center to win.

                  So how do you get them to move left? By giving them victories. Consistent and overwhelming victories. Because when they lose, like they’ve lost 20 years out of the last 24 years, they will go to the centre to find votes.

          • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            6 months ago

            Tanked his run by counting all the votes not cast for him?

            Why am I still surprised that people who need to be dragged kicking and screaming to generals, nevermind primaries think that people who don’t need any convincing not voting for their guy for them is cheating?

            • running_ragged@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              No, by obstructing his and his supporters efforts in key primaries, because the DNC knew they wanted Hillary for reasons.

            • njm1314@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              6 months ago

              This is a rather unique thing you see on Lemmy I’ve noticed. I mean everyone knows the Democratic Party pulled some bullshit during that primary, but the delusions you see on Lemmy take it so much further. It honestly kind of reminds me of Lost Cause myths. It’s very much in the same vein.

              • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                I have legit seen people suggest the very normal and totally socialist thing of counting individual donations instead of ballots as the only legitimate way to run the primary.

                The socialists. Wanted to create a literal donor class. That is recognized in party procedures. Because they were that mad that working class black voters identified more with the southern lady than a darkhorse from Vermont who’s not even a party member 99% of the time. Even after a bunch of white liberal arts majors talked at them about how he’s totally down with the culture because he got arrested at a protest one time.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          6 months ago

          Why not shut the fuck up and vote against the fascists because you’re not a fascist?

          Mate…

          Do you think you can have this argument with tens of millions of Americans, and it will convince them?

          We know what will get enough votes to beat Republicans. But for some reason people just keep repeating that these “moderate” and uncharismatic 70+ year olds have a better shot.

          They don’t.

          We’re not even arguing if they should have a better shot because of their views.

          Because we have literal decades of history to show they’re not what wins elections.

          So if all that matter si beating trump, why is this the third election in a row we’re not using the best strategy?

          What’s the point of running more conservative candidates than voters want when it makes it more likely the fascists win?

          • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            6 months ago

            Do you think you can have this argument with tens of millions of Americans, and it will convince them?

            Nah bruh. They think they’re arguing against you. That if they abuse you enough that you’ll cow: but if there is one thing we have excellent evidence for, its that abusing or guilting voters into doing what you think they should does not work. Not for Democrats or Republicans.

            They are taking the criticisms they should be putting at the feet of the DNC and its associated cheerleaders in media, and blaming the voters. But we all know, they’re just wrong. Like, they’re completely wrong about how voting works, how campaigning works, and how winning elections work.

            If they really cared about winning elections, they would bring this criticism to the DNC and demand better candidates; and not budge until they do so. But they actually don’t care about winning the election. They know (I believe) they’ve committed to a losing strategy, and they are setting up the rhetorical case on the back-end so that they have some one to blame for them insisting we do something that isn’t going to work.

          • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            17
            ·
            6 months ago

            Mate how about you stop making excuses for fascists and stop giving them the benefit of being presumed to have a reasonable position that deserves anything but getting called out for their collaborationist shit.

            “Tickle my funny bone or I’ll let your kids get sent to camps!”, that’s the mentality you’re trying to argue is fair and reasonable and worth having a debate with as if it’s anything but abject failure of one’s own ability to not be one of the worst kinds of people imagineable.

            “Make me excited about not letting the morality police happen!”

            “I wanna feel good about preventing contraceptive bans!”

            “What am I getting out of preventing them putting machine gun nests on the wall with orders to shoot to kill anyone who approaches?”

            Yeah I agree Biden’s boring, I agree Clinton and Gore and Kerry were boring too, doesn’t change that they ran against christofascist candidates, and the supposed not fascists of this country abjectly failed to do their bare minimum duty because “I don’t really feel like it.”

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              21
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              6 months ago

              how about you stop making excuses for fascists

              Who’s doing that?

              I’m saying we need to do what has the best chance to beating the fascists.

              Which is run a charismatic candidate who agrees with Dem voters.

              You on the other hand, keep insulting people and saying voters need to compromise but politicians don’t.

              That’s not democracy. Especially when the DNC has argued in court they can interfere with a primary as much as they want, because the results are non finding anyways.

              Think about that.

              It means Dem voters never get any day in who represents them.

              When the goal is getting more votes than fascists, that’s not a good plan. We need to start out with a popular candidate that most Dem voters already want to vote for. Not pick someone most dont want and then try to breathe literally tens of millions of people into holding their noses.

              You just have a bad plan, and I feel like maybe if you just calm down, you could realize that what matters is beating republicans, so we should run candidates Dem voters want.