• Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    6 months ago

    Tanked his run by counting all the votes not cast for him?

    Why am I still surprised that people who need to be dragged kicking and screaming to generals, nevermind primaries think that people who don’t need any convincing not voting for their guy for them is cheating?

    • running_ragged@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      No, by obstructing his and his supporters efforts in key primaries, because the DNC knew they wanted Hillary for reasons.

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      This is a rather unique thing you see on Lemmy I’ve noticed. I mean everyone knows the Democratic Party pulled some bullshit during that primary, but the delusions you see on Lemmy take it so much further. It honestly kind of reminds me of Lost Cause myths. It’s very much in the same vein.

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I have legit seen people suggest the very normal and totally socialist thing of counting individual donations instead of ballots as the only legitimate way to run the primary.

        The socialists. Wanted to create a literal donor class. That is recognized in party procedures. Because they were that mad that working class black voters identified more with the southern lady than a darkhorse from Vermont who’s not even a party member 99% of the time. Even after a bunch of white liberal arts majors talked at them about how he’s totally down with the culture because he got arrested at a protest one time.