fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2年前Explain yourselves, comp sci.mander.xyzimagemessage-square71fedilinkarrow-up1514arrow-down117
arrow-up1497arrow-down1imageExplain yourselves, comp sci.mander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2年前message-square71fedilink
minus-squareunalivejoy@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2年前Thread safe as in it raises an exception instead of breaking your list.
minus-squareDaPorkchop_ [any]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2年前Only if one thread modifies it while another one is iterating over it, if two threads try to modify the list at once there isn’t any kind of synchronization and it really could break your list.
minus-squareunalivejoy@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2年前For everything else, there’s Collections.synchronizedList(new ArrayList<>())
Thread safe as in it raises an exception instead of breaking your list.
Only if one thread modifies it while another one is iterating over it, if two threads try to modify the list at once there isn’t any kind of synchronization and it really could break your list.
For everything else, there’s
Collections.synchronizedList(new ArrayList<>())