• Doom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    27 days ago

    Wifi? You may as well believe in magic. Buy a box of cable and one of these!

    No testers - raw dog it. Party like a Quake party in 1999.

    • rmuk@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      And now I will sing a traditional song of my people.

      🟧⬜,🟧,🟩⬜,🟦,🟦⬜,🟩,🟫⬜,🟫.

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        26 days ago

        My brain was like that’s to many wires… Until I finally was like oh orange white … One wire lol. Them everything fell into place.

        • zackhow@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          27 days ago

          Crossover, but it isn’t needed anymore since most modern devices can detect what they are connected to and adjust.

          • Feidry@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            27 days ago

            Well there was A and B and it’s been long enough since I made any cable, I don’t remember which one everyone uses and which one only weirdos use.

            • netweirdo@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              27 days ago

              T568B is the one everyone uses while T568A is the odd one.

              I don’t get what’s particularly bad about T568A though? I was told it’s just plain worse than T568B for anything faster than gigabit and I swear I never saw any store bought cables using it.

              • Zanathos@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                26 days ago

                The configuration has absolutely no bearing on performance. It is purely for standardization. Straight through cables work with either because it’s literally just connecting the copper on either end. The difference between A and B is just flipping 2 pairs around although I forget which. Only 4 or 5 cables of 8 are even used to this day which is crazy.

                • adjectivenoun@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  26 days ago

                  There are 4 pairs of 2 wires, for 8 overall. They are all used, but the pairs are redundant. From what I understand, when you send a positive pulse on, say, the solid blue wire, you also send a negative pulse on the stripy blue and white wire. The twisted pairs should counteract any interference, but if it doesn’t, the arrival of the bumps with opposite polarity should foolproof things a little.

                  Oh yeah it’s called differential signalling.

        • adjectivenoun@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          26 days ago

          OK so I just learned, like, last week that there are two standards. Why are there two standards? WTF?

          (The context is I was turning an Ethernet cable into an EtherCAT cable, which is a stupid industrial standard where you only wire up pins 1, 2, 3, and 6, and then charge the end user 200 times more for the cable.)

          • RamRabbit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            26 days ago

            There are two standards as it allows one to make a crossover cable. (Do B on one side and A on the other)

            I also find crossover cables completely useless and refuse to own one less it gets mixed into the pile. Everyone has a router/switch, which negates the need completely.

            • black0ut@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              26 days ago

              Back at the beginning of times ethernet, you needed the crossover cables to connect routers to routers, switches to switches or end devices to end devices. They wouldn’t work with the straight cables.

              The standard still needs those cables to be crossover, but nowadays the port itself can detect what type of cable you connected, what type of cable it needs, and rewire itself to accept whatever you throw at it.

              The same thing happens when you directly connect 2 PCs together without a switch in the middle. But the ports also adapt themselves and work it out.

              You could also use a crossover cable, and your devices would figure it out too.

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      27 days ago

      I bought a cheap tool years ago and a few hundred feet of cat6 and some connectors and wall plates

      ran my main AP off my own crimped cords for years without issue. speed tests always showed full speed

    • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      Had one. Somebody stole it at a lan, many years ago. Haven’t bought another one, since, because I’m dumb.

  • heartSagan5@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    26 days ago

    The router is useless-ish without the $3 snakey boi.

    “Ish?” Because you could set it up as a Wireless repeater?

    • helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      26 days ago

      Yes, some wireless routers can be used as repeaters.

      Routers like that are really multi-purposes devices that handle routing, switching, and wireless. If you’re only using a local network, you can still have the wifi network and all your devices communicate through that. You just won’t have internet access.

      With out the router/switch, the cable’s usefullness is reduced - at least in the networking application we’re talking about (the cable itself is incredibly usesful for many other things besides ethernet). You can connect (most) devices directly together for communication, they’ll just self assign an IP address.

      In less words, you can have a network with just a wireless router and no cable, but you can’t have a network with only a cable and no router (well, you can’t with ‘normal people’ devices)(also you don’t need a router for a local network, only a switch - but the home versions are often combo devices and just called a router).

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      26 days ago

      You can get routers which use a SIM card for getting internet access. They’re pretty cool. You just plug them into a wall outlet and bam, you’ve got your WiFi with internet access.

      Plus you can even get them with integrated powerbank, so you really don’t need to plug anything anymore.

  • nymnympseudonym@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    27 days ago

    WiFi has its problems but they don’t include a tiny plastic tab costing $0.002 that inevitably breaks off, making the physical connection susceptible to fail at the tiniest touch of a butterfly’s wing

    • idk (she/her)@szmer.info
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      i got 10m of cat 6 for 28pln(around $8) at my local store, and to overpower the router on the picture you probably only need cat 5e

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      for a short prefab patch cable to go from modem to router, it’s actually a bit higher than what we pay.

    • kaotic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      There’s a few 10 packs of 6 foot cables on Amazon for around $18, that’s less than $2 each.

      • TrollTrollrolllol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        26 days ago

        The leftovers from a 100’ roll i bought 15 years ago, some dusty ends and a crimper. $3 is probably too much. It’s probably been 15 years since I’ve done it too but I still remember the order: Orange-white, orange, green-white, blue, blue-white, green, brown-white, brown

  • shneancy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    26 days ago

    i love cables, cables are the best thing, give me snakey boy, give me wired headphones, give me wired keyboard and mice

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    27 days ago

    I climbed up in the roof crawl space (by no stretch is it an “attic”) and ran Cat6 to every room in my house 15 years ago. The living room and two smaller bedrooms got one, and the master bedroom got two.

    I’m very happy with the upgrade. I also run WiFi, of course, for phones and tablets, and my kid’s Steam Deck, etc.

  • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    26 days ago

    Wireless data links should be the exclusive domain of temporary, nomadic and/or sacrificial links.

    If the channel is permanent, static, or critical; as much of the path as practicable should be provisioned with constrained energy transmission.

  • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    I’ve grown to hate these routers. They only seem useful if you live in an apartment and place them in the middle and your walls are made of paper. Bought a few through the years thinking more money = better wifi, but wall construction and placement have much more impact. Living in a brick house, they’re pretty shit. I’ve switched to non gamified wifi AP’s connected to ethernet and the wifi’s been great. Still prioritize wired wherever possible though.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      26 days ago

      One of the worst things about those routers other than having generally poor coverage despite looking like a Crown of Thorns was that if you actually took advantage of the more advanced features like VLANs, port forwarding, static routes, FTP and all that stuff and set it up… It inevitably seemed that there was a 99% chance that a firmware update would not allow you to restore a backup of the router config on the updated device!

      That happened a couple times, spent days getting everything set up only to find out the firmware update refused to load a config made with an older version. F that. Never used those routers again.

  • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    27 days ago

    WiFi 6e and 7 are legitimate competitors to standard 1gig Ethernet. Setting up my new WAP I got 1.4gbps down on my phone. And I think my laptop touched 2 at one point.

    But Ethernet will always be more consistent.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      27 days ago

      WiFi 6e and 7 are legitimate competitors to standard 1gig Ethernet.

      In isolation, perhaps. Now cram 25 neighbors in high density housing in range with one another all using the same spectrum and see if that performance still is sustainable.

      • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        6ghz wifi doesn’t go very far, you’ll almost never see 25 6ghz connections.

        At work I still get about 700 down with 25+ devices connected. There’s legitimately about 50 wifi connections despite being 30 floors up, but they’re all 2.4ghz which is worthless. Even 5ghz kinda sucks. But 6ghz? Rock solid.

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          27 days ago

          The increase in frequency reduces signal penetration. Things like walls become major sources of signal attenuation. In open office plans, with no obstructive walls, no problem. In a house or apartment where you’re separated by multiple walls (and the materials/thickness those walls are made of) that can add up to significant signal loss.

          I haven’t personally tried any 6GHz wifi technologies. Have you used it in any places where you’re separated by obstructions from the access point?