An investigation by Gamers Nexus found LG smart TVs sweep local networks to map phones and nearby devices. Tests also showed the sets can capture microphone audio with the screen off — they then upload data once reconnected to the internet.

  • graycube@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    26 minutes ago

    My LG TV runs WebOS, which is a linux distro. I have been wondering how hard it is to root and replace with a distro of my own choosing. I had thought because my TV is pretty old that I was safe from the more sophisticated spying, but last week it interrupted what I was watching and would not let me continue using it without agreeing to new terms of use. This revived my interest in rooting it.

  • kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    38 minutes ago

    And that’s why I have a VLAN without outbound connections allowed. Still allows me to cast to the device from a separate vlan but the TV has no internet at all.

    • sickday@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      30 minutes ago

      Seriously, this is the way. I did this too in about 15 mins. Also setup a simple rule to allow the vlan to reach my homeserver in a separate vlan specifically on Plex and Jellyfin ports. That’s it. They cant phone home. You still enjoy your own media.

  • manualoverride@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Secretly recording conversations in peoples homes sounds like it should be against the law in a number of countries.

    Imagine someone working for the government, security services, or a defence contractor. I suspect LG may be in trouble with a number of National Security agencies.

    • Seppo@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It is illegal. Unfortunately crime is legal for corporations. They just pay the crime fee and can continue undisturbed. Shareholders must be held responsible individually, otherwise it will only get worse.

      • Jajcus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Not shareholders. Decision makers. Upper msnagement. Shareholders shpuld pay in share value (the finantial penalty to the corporations should be high enough to affect that), bu the personal an criminal responsibility belongs to managers, CEO in particular.

      • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Shareholders must be held responsible individually

        So, are you personally on the hook here because the company managing your pension fund is holding stocks in LG? Because that technically makes you a shareholder as it was bought with your money, right?

        Edit: not sure why I get downvoted, this is a legitimate concern/nuance to the debate. The managing company doesn’t own these stocks so they’re not the shareholders, that’s the people whose money they are managing, but these people are not directly in control of the funds. Who is the liable party in this?

        • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          29 minutes ago

          The highest level employee/officer who had knowledge of it should be held responsible

        • Axolotl@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          47 minutes ago

          The fact that a pension fund can hold shareholds is crazy by itself, also, is the pension found a company or managed by your state? It shouldn’t really be a thing in first place

          • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            22 minutes ago

            is the pension fund a company or managed by your state?

            Both in my case, as there are both the government pension fund that is mandatory and the one used by my employer which uses one of the large primary pension institutions in my country.

            Is it a bit weird that I don’t just manage all my pensions myself? Yes, a bit. But it’s how its done in my country and it has some tax benefits compared to getting the money in hand and investing myself.

            • Axolotl@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              20 minutes ago

              Is it a bit weird that I don’t just manage all my pensions myself?

              Naah, at least, i don’t know anyone that does it in my country

        • Seppo@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          24 minutes ago

          It doesn’t matter how many layers of evasion there are. Responsibility has to be with individuals in order for there to be change.

    • TipRing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Recording without consent is very much a crime in any single-party state, but my guess is that the TOS that people click past to use the TV gives them permission to record you. If it didn’t, they would be in big legal hot water.

        • StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 minutes ago

          Consenting to recording makes recording legal.

          Making that consent required to use the TV or its features and it being buried within lengthy, opaque terms of service in a country with a low level of literacy should be illegal, but it stands in the US because it’s a consumer hostile country.

      • inari@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        2 hours ago

        The problem is way worse: big tech contributes tobribes politicians to vote according to industry interests.

      • whaleross@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        It’s not the politicians job to know everything but to make decisions and legislate based on information from the expertise. It is the people in the know that need to make the proposals for the politicians to bring it up. It’s us, the tech literate, that need to write proposals that are informative with arguments derived from trusted sources to make the politicians aware that these are concerns that need to be addressed.

          • whaleross@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 minutes ago

            Let’s all lie belly up and do nothing and accept that nothing will ever change for the better because nobody else is doing it for us and it is impossible for us to change the world all alone. This is exactly the defeatist mindset that the economic elites want people to have.

            You could do something small, like find out your representatives and write a personal mail to them, informing them from your point of view. With enough people doing small things and some doing big things the chances for things like this gaining traction are magnitudes bigger than giving up in advance. It takes a few hours to a few days depending on your dedication and whatever cost coffee is in your area of residence.

  • db_null@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    27 minutes ago

    Great, I wonder what my fridge is up to. It’s LG and has wifi for some reason. I never connected it to my network, but I wouldn’t be surprised if they take advantage of open networks anyway

    • nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 minutes ago

      I tested this when my LG fridge was new, and got a warning when I left the door open. Quite helpful. But still disabled.

  • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I ran a packet capture on my TV as I left it turned off overnight.

    They wake up in the middle of the night, do “stuff” then go back offline. Like a zombie.

    • Kristell@herbicide.fallcounty.omg.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 minutes ago

      I have basically every URL our TV automatically pings blocked at this point. It phones home every 10-30 seconds whether they’re off or on. I think when we get a new TV we’re looking for a dumb TV

  • Synapse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    My LG TV is not getting network privileges, ever. I wonder if there is a way to turn off the WiFi radio altogether.

    • Axolotl@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      44 minutes ago

      You could try to host your DNS, change the router DNS to that and then spend a while to see to which addresses the TV talk to and block them, it’s probably time consuming but if you have that time, it can work

      • whaleross@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 minutes ago

        Yeah, I know. I have a blocklist for LG and other common brands compiled by someone else on my router DNS adblocker. But considering how sneaky they are with collecting information they should stay the fuck away from, I bet they have mechanisms to get around their common ad domains for the data that matters.