About a quarter of South Koreans already pay for AI services, compared to just 2% of Americans

South Korea is preparing to offer free generative AI services to its entire population, using the technology to help people handle everyday tasks such as booking medical appointments, finding housing, and sorting out taxes.

The program is intended to expand access to homegrown AI systems while giving the government a larger role in how they are used for everyday services.

  • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    2 days ago

    RIP Korean students in formative years learning critical thinking and social skills.

    Govt-funded Chatbot about to gaslight them that every idea and question is genius-level, and that social connections are something a computer can fulfil.

    • tomatolung@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      What students? They’ve been shutting down school because they have no students to teach. They are on the leading edge of a demographic trend the ‘developed’ world will soon see.

      • RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Care to explain? Sounds interesting, my last impression was that SK was a society with massive competitive pressure in education and career. What happened?

        • k0e3@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          There aren’t any children being made. Therefore no students to teach. Same is happening all over the world but way higher pace in SK. It’s easy to forget how shitty their society can be with the glitz of k-pop culture distracting us. I don’t mean that as an insult specific to Korea. Many other countries look great from the outside but is never without issues.

          • historicaldocuments@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 days ago

            Younger person looking at their own society collapse around them because having children is too expensive: at least this old generation will take their stupid dogma with them along with their institutional knowledge of machining, woodworking, trades, etc.

            Older person looking at their own society collapse around them because having children is too expensive: at least we made the dogma stick!

        • Contramuffin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 days ago

          It’s all related. Massive societal pressure = no time for children. No time for children means birth rates are significantly below replacement rate. At first the issue was ignorable. Now it’s not. Cracks are starting to show. With so few children, nobody is “picking up the torch” for virtually very industry, and whatever workers are left are dwindling as they retire.

          You see a similar thing happening in Japan, too. And a similar issue is occurring in America and Europe, though their situation is not as bad in comparison. It’s speculated that all advanced economies will eventually face this challenge, but South Korea is really trying to speedrun total societal collapse

          • moopet@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            There’s nothing inherently wrong with declining birth rates when your population is so oversized. If you try the “there’s nobody to look after the old people” argument, that’s infrastructure and priorities, not an actual resource shortage.

            • Almacca@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              I wasn’t suggesting it was wrong or anything, just offering an explanation. Personally, I reckon there too many fucking people in the world.

    • Xerxos@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      You know that you can use ChatGPT for free, right? Also, paid plans aren’t so expensive that a student couldn’t afford one.

      If you think free access is the only thing between students using AI and learning traditionally, I’m afraid you will be disappointed.

      Free AI won’t change much for most people, except that the government can choose what models the citizens will use. This way they can be independent of US companies dominating the market.