• communism@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 months ago

    Idiot on a team of intelligent people. I get pissed off at people being stupid. My team might get pissed off at me but that’s their problem. And generally I like being around people smarter than me because I learn a lot from them.

  • illi@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 months ago

    To be the inteligent person in a team of idiots is certainly one of the worst things that could happen to you.

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      That depends, if one of the idiots is in charge, it’s torture. However, if you don’t have to answer to any of them, you can set them up with busy work to feel important and do all the actual work yourself. Then it’s only bad if you don’t like the work.

  • Mister Neon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    Idiot on a team of intelligent people. Hopefully, they’ll put up with me long enough to point where I learn enough to stop being an idiot.

      • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’d argue that management is simply a different skill. And the reason so many managers are bad is because they were promoted from roles that didn’t previously require management experience.

        Let’s say you hire someone to bolt things together on an assembly line, and then three years later they’re managing projects (without ever having gone to school in those interim years to learn any management skills). Yeah, they’ll probably be a fucking awful project manager. Unless they’re naturally gifted at management and really good at thinking on their feet, they’ll be flying by the seat of their pants. They’ll be using a ton of maladaptive tactics that were developed for surviving, not thriving. Because their original skill set and experience wasn’t based in project management, and they haven’t done anything to further their managerial skills.

        It’s the old “if you judge a fish by its ability to fly” quote, except that fish keep getting hired because they’re good swimmers, and then they get promoted into positions where they’re expected to fly.

  • switcheroo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    If the smart people are nice, I’d be ok being the idiot. Still might feel a little bad over not being able to help. Maybe I’ll be the cheerleader. “Go team! Hell yeah! Crunch those numbers!”

    I’ll bring snacks?

  • rbos@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    So long as the intelligent people are also kind. A group of intelligent people that are backbiting and cruel is the absolute worst.

  • Jarix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Idiot on an intelligent team, I’ll only get better

    Intelligent in an idiot team, they will only make me dumber

  • BassTurd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ve gone being the smartest person in the room in my previous couple roles (mostly because I was the only person with any IT or platform knowledge, not because I’m some prodigy) to the bottom of the totem pole and well behind the intelligence of my current team since I changed careers.

    It’s wonderful having people around that are smarter than me that I can learn from and ask questions to. It’s hard being the idiot on a team when you’re trying to improve and care about your work. Working with idiots that don’t care or seemingly never improve is the worst. I’ve learned more over the past 8 months than I have since I started my professional career.

    I like the phrase, “Never be the smartest person in the room”. Sometimes it happens, but in most situations, there is someone else that is more knowledgeable about something than you, and that’s an opportunity to learn.

  • its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    In my early career I made a bit of a niche for myself being the idiot on a team of very smart people. My job was to ask the simple question that none of them considered before it was too late.

  • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    “idiot” and “intelligent” are not mutually exclusive. One can be both at the same time. There are intelligent people doing idiotic stuff.

    • TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Of course people aren’t completely predictable. But do you see how you phrased that? “Intelligent people doing idiotic stuff”. You recognize the difference between intelligent people doing idiotic stuff vs an idiot doing idiotic stuff.

      • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        No, I meant Intelligent people can be idiots too. Idiot does not mean dumb. So what you are asking is not idiot vs intelligent, but dumb vs intelligent.

          • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Didn’t I just told you that? You “meant”. What do you mean I don’t believe that? I just told you that I realized you was talking about dumb instead idiot, because you used it interchangeably.

      • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Obviously the intelligent person on a team of idiots then. There is value in being the least intelligent person in a room, since you have the opportunity to learn from people smarter than you. But not if you’re just forgetting things so that you can relearn them.