In March, a girl’s stepfather took his own life after cops discovered that he had used Grok to create 7,000 sexually explicit images using one photo taken when his stepdaughter was 11 years old, the amended complaint alleged.

Grok allowed the man to generate extreme images depicting incest and rape without flagging any harmful behavior, the complaint said. Seemingly, xAI’s child safety system only intervened after the man input a prompt for “gang rape.” That request sent a CyberTip to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC), which alerted law enforcement to the AI CSAM.

Yet the harm was not stopped then, either. Despite mandatory reporting requirements to share information like a user’s IP address when CSAM is flagged, xAI repeatedly refused to help cops or NCMEC identify the user, the complaint alleged. For weeks, xAI allegedly “obstructed this investigation at every turn” and made it harder for “law enforcement efforts to locate, identify, and apprehend the perpetrator.”

Eventually, the stepfather was arrested after cops obtained a warrant to seize his devices. That’s when “a forensic review revealed approximately 7,000 AI-generated images and videos” depicting his stepdaughter, which were allegedly produced using Grok. Without Grok providing users with easy access to “undressing” capabilities, his family doubts he ever would have generated the harmful images, which he allegedly trafficked online in trade for “CSAM produced by other child sex predators.”

    • Damage@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 days ago

      I mean, I guess he was trying to get one with the right number of fingers and human eyes

    • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      It’s really not, in the context of how quickly the images are generated. You can just tell it to make 100 images from a single prompt and let it run. There’s a temptation to continually tweak the prompt after each run to improve the result. He could have gotten to 7000 in just a couple of days.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      He was trading them, so it might be one image, reproduced 7000 times. Clearly that’s not the case, but he probably made fewer images, and sold them multiple times.

      • curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        No, he quite specifically made over 7000, using a single photo as the reference.

        Edit: Just to mention this is a Jane Doe added to an existing suit, and the picture was from.when she was 11, she is in her 20s now. Some articles even describe the imagery to some degree (not recommended reading BTW, I’d like to kill those brain cells).

        It was only reported by xAI after a very specific, graphic, and horrific image request was made, despite there having been thousands of others generated, they didnt share anything actionable despite multiple requests from the NCMEC and cops over the course of several months. He killed himself 2 days after his devices were searched.

        He had traded many of the over 7000 images he generated to get even more from others.

        She is one of 5 Jane Does involved in the lawsuit.

        • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          If he could prompt grok to produce say a hundred or so variants of a prompt, getting to 7k images might not even take that long…

          • curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            I’d guess this is what he did, yeah.

            “Make a few examples of this”

            “i like number 3. Generate more as a set”

            That kind of thing. Its pretty horrifying that s cloud-based model allows for this in the first place, even worse that he could likely generate large themed sets of them.

            Edit: Worse when you realize he may have just used her as the basis because he didnt want to get caught for googling “pictures of 11yr olds” or whatever. Thats actually part of this Jane Doe’s statement/claim, that the ease of access provided by grok to generate CSAM was a driver.

            • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 days ago

              exactly, I had mucked around with a few models from huggingface on comfyui a while ago for (legal) image generation, and it was basically that… start with a prompt, mess around with parameters until you get an output that you like, then have it generate a few dozen to pick the few you like the best.

              Works really well if you want abstract/ambient wallpapers and stuff to set as a slideshow.