The California governor described White House reporters as ‘sycophants’

California Governor Gavin Newsom criticized the media for what he described as overly deferential coverage of Donald Trump, characterizing reporters in Oval Office press briefings as “sycophants.”

The Democratic governor — widely seen as a potential contender for the 2028 presidential race — made the remarks during a Sunday interview with progressive commentator Jack Cocchiarella.

Cocchiarella pressed Newsom on what he framed as “hesitancy” within the White House press corps to scrutinize certain subjects: namely, the 80-year-old president’s health.

“You see these press conferences in the Oval Office,” the governor replied. “You maybe have one or two reasonable reporters. They ask a question; there’s no chance for a follow-up. And then it’s seven sycophants from news outlets.”

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    Lefties you gotta get your person up and ready. Presuming elections still exist and should this guy emerge as the frontrunner you have about 814 days before you have to vote for this guy or continue flushing ourselves down the republican hole.

    Every article about him brings the boo-birds. That’s fine, but there’s still no champion for our leftier-than-thou politicos. You just gonna let it ride on Bernie again?

    • null@piefed.nullspace.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      They’re busy boosting people like Platner and then backpedalling and blaming the Dems when it backfires.

    • ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      Bernie is officially too old (honestly, he was in 2015)

      If Newsome is on the ballot in november I’ll vote for him. Of course if Lassie was on the ballot as a democrat in 2028, I’ll vote for her.

      Don’t give a shit. Anything is better than a republican.

      • shirasho@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        48
        ·
        4 days ago

        That is NOT true. Voting for a Democrat that does nothing is just as bad. Not only would they do nothing to reverse the damage, they have actively taken votes that would have been better used on a politician that actually cares.

        A lot of people will blindly vote for the person with a D next to their name. The Democratic party is purposely not putting the best candidates forward. There needs to be more awareness of who the duds are and either vote them out or not vote them in.

        • Triumph@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          37
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          4 days ago

          Primaries are where you decide. After that, you choose the least worst. And sorry, a “Democrat that does nothing” is not just as bad as open fascism.

            • jumjummy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              4 days ago

              No 3rd party candidate will win a General Election unless something changes in the way the Is voting system works. Voting for a 3rd party is literally throwing your vote away at best, or helping the Republicans at worst.

              It’s either naivety or intentional disinformation to spout otherwise.

              • Faithless@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                Indeed. Anyone spreading stuff like this is either doing to to help trump or is really stupid

              • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                so in your worldview does voting Libertarian hurt the Republicans and/or Does it help the Democrats?

                Additionally, voting 3rd-party is not “Figuratively throwing your vote away.” Not voting when you’re registered is “Figuratively Throwing your vote away.” Voting 3rd party at the very least puts the other parties on notice that you’re willing to vote -just not for them.

                • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  so in your worldview does voting Libertarian hurt the Republicans and/or Does it help the Democrats?

                  Are you actually asking this? You actually don’t understand how spoiler candidates happen in US democracy?

                  • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    Yes I am and you have to be removed or clinically insane to think the the largest third-party by votes would actually be spoiling any vote except for the Republicans.

                • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  For one thing, there is no serious third party. For another: history.

                  If we had ranked choice voting, it might be different. If Democratic Socialists want to run in and win primaries and run as Democrats, hey, great.

                  I am not throwing away my vote in the general for some unserious party like the Green Party (which is probably just a cutout anyway) who runs a candidate at the national level every 4 years and does next to nothing at the local level.

                  • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    7
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    4 days ago

                    it’s not “throwing away your vote” it puts on record that your willing to vote just not for the major party candidates. Not voting is “throwing your vote away.” Voting for someone you don’t like and winning --That’s throwing your vote away.

        • ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          And that’s how people like Trump become president. Pure and simple.

          Sometimes the lesser of two evils is quite a lot less fucking evil.

              • matthurtme@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                3 days ago

                This piece of giant shit fucked up California so much. He’s to blame for all the fires, he stopped funding fire departments to do controlled burns and left it to the “consumers”.

                Also, so many whistleblowers came out from his fundraising foundation that he and his wife were embezzling funds during the Biden administration, Biden’s doj launched an investigation still going on today.

                He also used prison populations to fight fires as slave labor with no chance of becoming a fire fighter upon release because of their criminal records.

                He regularly makes sure to cover for his habitually drunk driving asshole of an uncle, including VEHICULAR MANSLAUGHTER. And plays the stock market just like his corrupt cunt aunt.

                He gave billionaires WATER RIGHTS to waste on growing fucking almonds that DIRECTLY CAUSED droughts in the central valley.

                This fucking swamp taint needs to have his personal winery dumped with the round up he approved to dump on forests, killing any life and draining into municipal water infrastructure. He’s directly causing more cancer and health issues for regular people

                Newsom is JUST AS MUCH OF A FASCIST AS TRUMP.

                HE SUCKS BILLIONAIRE COCK EVERYDAY, THAT’S WHY CALIFORNIA HAS THE MOST BILLIONAIRES IN THE FUCKING COUNTRY NOW.

                HE FUCKING DESTROYED MY HOME STATE

          • shirasho@feddit.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            The problem as I see it is that you and the other posters here have fallen for the moving goalposts. “Shit is ok - at least it isn’t vomit.” That is such a poor and defeatist mentality to have. It isn’t a bad thing to want more. Don’t be OK with “the lesser of two evils”. Fight for at least one good candidate. Hold your party accountable for choosing awful candidates that don’t have the people’s best interests at heart.

            I have voted for the lesser of two evils, and I will continue to do so. That won’t stop me from asking for better, and it will not change my mind that inaction in a bad situation is no better than doing bad things.

            • ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              4 days ago

              That’s what primaries are for.

              Like it or not, we live in a two-party system. The electoral college and the congressional rules make it so. We can either make it work, or we can give up.

              I’m going to vote for the leftist, most progressive person i can in the primaries. But when that fails, I’m going to vote for the democrat on the ticket because even the worst democrat is better than the best republican at this point.

              We can’t afford another 4 years of Trump-Light in JD Vance… Millions of people have already died as a result of Trump getting back in this time… and more people will die, and it will be marginalized people. People of Color, Trans people, immigrants. As in real death.

              Not Voting has real consequences.

                  • matthurtme@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    This piece of giant shit fucked up California so much. He’s to blame for all the fires, he stopped funding fire departments to do controlled burns and left it to the “consumers”.

                    Also, so many whistleblowers came out from his fundraising foundation that he and his wife were embezzling funds during the Biden administration, Biden’s doj launched an investigation still going on today.

                    He also used prison populations to fight fires as slave labor with no chance of becoming a fire fighter upon release because of their criminal records.

                    He regularly makes sure to cover for his habitually drunk driving asshole of an uncle, including VEHICULAR MANSLAUGHTER. And plays the stock market just like his corrupt cunt aunt.

                    He gave billionaires WATER RIGHTS to waste on growing fucking almonds that DIRECTLY CAUSED droughts in the central valley.

                    This fucking swamp taint needs to have his personal winery dumped with the round up he approved to dump on forests, killing any life and draining into municipal water infrastructure. He’s directly causing more cancer and health issues for regular people

                    Newsom is JUST AS MUCH OF A FASCIST AS TRUMP.

                    HE SUCKS BILLIONAIRE COCK EVERYDAY, THAT’S WHY CALIFORNIA HAS THE MOST BILLIONAIRES IN THE FUCKING COUNTRY NOW.

                    HE FUCKING DESTROYED MY HOME STATE

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          Voting for a Democrat that does nothing is just as bad.

          Good luck convincing anyone who has eyes and a brain

            • starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              3 days ago

              It’s one of my biggest issues with lemmy, it’s like the democrat that gets us some actually great policies, who does have some big problems, is treated the same as the Republicans passing racist transphobic climate damaging research canceling (also canceled funding for cancer research for children…) legislation.

              Democrats seem to be useless because they have to spend 4 years undoing the trainwreck caused by Republicans, but the American people have the memory of a goldfish apparently so we keep getting more Republicans.

              • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                it’s like the democrat that gets us some actually great policies, who does have some big problems, is treated the same as the Republicans

                Exactly. Same, if not even worse sometimes. Because it’s a given that Republicans are shit, so they focus their ire on liberals and progressives that haven’t passed their arbitrary purity test.

                They also seem to have no concept of things like political capital.

                • starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  True actually I forgot they’ve normalized it so much to where a headline of “trump caught defrauding the government of billions and giving hundreds of millions to israel” is sort of a “yeah that’s just what he does.”

        • ModCen@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          If Newsom is the Democrat candidate in 2028, I think that’s an alright outcome. I think he would be a better president than Trump. Not just because he has a “D” next to his name, but instead because his viewpoints seem more rational and fair than those of Trump.

          Some people might think that Newsom isn’t progressive enough, but whoever is the Democrat candidate, they need to have broad enough appeal to win a national election. If the candidate is someone who is very progressive then they might alienate a lot of centrist voters and fail to win a national election.

          • shirasho@feddit.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            There is a very clear difference between a Centrist and somebody who does nothing. Steady progress is fine as long as progress is made.

            Inaction means you are fine with the current situation. The people who do not stand up to the bully are no better than the bully, and the people who think otherwise are deluding themselves so they can feel better about not helping.

            I’m getting particularly frustrated that commenters are taking a very clear statement and manipulating it to put words in my mouth in order to think they’ve made a point. I’m not blaming you specifically but you are the straw that broke the camel’s back.

            I can’t fucking believe wanting politicians to actually make the world a better place would be so fucking controversial.

            • ModCen@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              3 days ago

              I think it’s fair to say that you shouldn’t blindly vote for someone just because they’re a Democrat. You should definitely evaluate the person. But I think Gavin Newsom specifically is an alright guy and I think he would lead a fairer administration than Trump’s, if elected. But I guess most people, if elected, would lead a fairer administration than Trump’s.

                • ModCen@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Is he? I don’t think Newsom demonises immigrants as much as Trump does… and Newsom has talked recently about favouring federal taxes on very wealthy people, to fund things like healthcare, while Trump seems to be happy to allow the wealthy to keep getting richer and act however they want towards the American public.

        • Faithless@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          Sure vlad, that’s what you trolls and bots said last time. Now america is a quickly falling into dictatorship. Shouldn’t you go hamster some fuel ?
          Everything is better then a fascist - saying otherwise is supporting fascism. You are either a foreign actor or stupid

              • matthurtme@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                This piece of giant shit fucked up California so much. He’s to blame for all the fires, he stopped funding fire departments to do controlled burns and left it to the “consumers”.

                Also, so many whistleblowers came out from his fundraising foundation that he and his wife were embezzling funds during the Biden administration, Biden’s doj launched an investigation still going on today.

                He also used prison populations to fight fires as slave labor with no chance of becoming a fire fighter upon release because of their criminal records.

                He regularly makes sure to cover for his habitually drunk driving asshole of an uncle, including VEHICULAR MANSLAUGHTER. And plays the stock market just like his corrupt cunt aunt.

                He gave billionaires WATER RIGHTS to waste on growing fucking almonds that DIRECTLY CAUSED droughts in the central valley.

                This fucking swamp taint needs to have his personal winery dumped with the round up he approved to dump on forests, killing any life and draining into municipal water infrastructure. He’s directly causing more cancer and health issues for regular people

                Newsom is JUST AS MUCH OF A FASCIST AS TRUMP.

                HE SUCKS BILLIONAIRE COCK EVERYDAY, THAT’S WHY CALIFORNIA HAS THE MOST BILLIONAIRES IN THE FUCKING COUNTRY NOW.

                HE FUCKING DESTROYED MY HOME STATE

                • Faithless@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Your home state’s economy is what keeps the US afloat.

                  Would you have any legitimatie sources for all of this? The GOP alternative facts don’t count obviously.

          • shirasho@feddit.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            Says the brand new account that has only posted politics and flames everyone they see. Either make an argument or get out.

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      Every article about him brings the boo-birds. That’s fine, but there’s still no champion for our leftier-than-thou politicos.

      Crazy, It’s almost like the DNC is complicit in keeping any viable economically left winged candidates away from any seat of power where they could one day become a decent candidate for president.

      I really can’t understand why anyone would think Gavin Newsome is a good candidate. Imo the only thing different between the mainstream Democrats and the Republicans is an affectation of wokeness, and Gavin Newsome doesn’t even clear that hurdle.

      His only talent in life is cheating on his wife and befriending the Gettys. Literally has not had to work for a thing in his life. Daddy bought him a degree at a private school, got a baseball scholarship… never played a single game. His best friend bought him a winery, and then had Mayor Brown take him under his wing in SF, and then had governor brown do the same exact thing.

      Can we not go a little bit farther to the left than the best friend of an oil Barron?

    • sportsjorts@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’ll do what I always do watch the Dem establishment shit all over everything while I hold my nose and vote for a shit stain like newsowm. There’s plenty of time for a “lefty” candidate to rise as long as the DNC fucks off to hell.

      • lennybird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        I’ll be shocked if AOC runs for president and not against Schumer.

        If she doesn’t then just vote Michelle Obama in, as there’s really nobody else I can think of in a position to run by then. Not a leftist at least in the surface but she’d win in a landslide. Easily. And I’d prefer her over someone like Newsom or Shapiro…

        • MartianRecon@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          She’ll go for Schumers seat. The Democrats need a dude to run against the republican. Shooting yourself in the foot by having a woman run is not worth the risk to the fate of the country. The handicap from the sexist assholes is just too great to overcome.

          That’s the frank games theory we’ve proven this decade.

          • lennybird@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            I think it has been debunked that a woman or person of color is why we lost. Key to note: Anyone who was a true sexist racist piece of shit was already core maga and never, ever going to vote for any Democrat.

            People must remember that nobody has polled higher against Trump – ever – than Michelle Obama. IF she wants to run (and a big if), she would win. Just need a tad bit more charisma.

            (If anyone has any evidence whatsoever beyond speculation or shoddy N=2 statistics, I’m all ears, but I have not found evidence).

            • edible_funk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              When was that debunked? How? If you genuinely think misogyny and misogynoir weren’t part of why Hillary and Kamala lost then I’ve got a bridge to sell you.

              • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 days ago

                What you’re missing is that even racists and misogynists will vote for women or minorities if they say the right talking points. Just look at all the pick-mes on the fascist side. This argument is always trotted out by “centrists” against progressives, but the centrists love to run women and minorities, act like that makes them progressive, and blame racism/misogyny when they lose for being uninspiring empty suits. I’m sick of the hypocrisy.

                • edible_funk@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  That’s not what I’m missing. That’s not what I’m saying. You’re also ignoring that racists and sexists who otherwise agree with the talking points will refuse to vote for women or minorities, but that’s neither here nor there. Bro said definitively that racism and sexism had nothing whatsoever to do with Hillary and Kamala losing. Considering the wildly racist and sexist history and culture of the US, I’m saying that’s fuckin nonsense. Is it the only or even the main reason they lost? No probably not. Did it have an influence? Abso-fuckin-lutely. Saying anything else is naive or disingenuous.

                  • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    I get where you’re coming from. I just think people are sick of hearing the argument that we shouldn’t run woman or minority candidates because racism/misogyny will harm their chance of success, myself included. I believe that the number of people who will absolutely refuse to ever vote for a woman or minority is often greatly exaggerated, and the number of people harboring racist/misogynist views who would still vote for a woman or minority in the right circumstances is vastly underestimated. When we talk about why a candidate won or lost an election it’s disingenuous to attribute it to something that had only a minor impact when compared to something that has proven to have had a massive (and election swinging) impact. In the case of the 2024 presidential election that something was Harris’s support for Israel’s genocide, and so it isn’t wrong to say that was the deciding factor in the election and racism/misogyny wasn’t.

              • lennybird@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                Go ahead and sell me that bridge because there is a complete and total lack of evidence to support the claim. Can’t really prove a counterfactual. Others made the claim she lost because of this; when asked for evidence, they always come up short.

                Counterpoints:

                • Biden polled worse than Harris at the end. (White Guy polling worse than Black Woman). Hence the switch in the first place, even Biden agreed!

                • Michelle Obama has always polled higher than anyone against Trump (Black Woman polling better than White Guy).

                Sexists bigots were already core Republican voters never voting for any D no matter who. The battle was lost elsewhere.

                • edible_funk@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Oh so you’re just operating under the assumption that nobody who would otherwise vote for a democrat is sexist or racist in one of the most overtly provably sexist and racist countries on earth. But go ahead and claim that racism and misogyny aren’t incredibly relevant factors in every election. There are more undecided/moderate/non voters that are racist and misogynistic than there are republicans. It’s fucking stupid to pretend that wasn’t a factor. Don’t be fucking stupid.

                  • lennybird@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    3 days ago

                    Still no evidence, and an increased propensity for aggression and ad hominems substituting said total lack of evidence, I see. Lots of fingers-in-ear denial and deflection as well.

                    Certainly aren’t convincing me of anything, lol.

                    I win.

            • MartianRecon@lemmus.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              4 days ago

              Uh dude like more than 5% of the party didn’t show up, and a bunch of male Democrats that identify as Latin or African American didn’t vote for her because she was a woman.

              Both Kamala and Clinton were two of the most qualified people to have run for president, and they were fucking beaten by the worst candidate in the history of politics.

              I don’t want to risk it.

              • lennybird@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                and a bunch of male Democrats that identify as Latin or African American didn’t vote for her because she was a woman.

                Uh, dude show me your evidence this was the reason lol.

                I’m going to give you a hint: You won’t find it. This is straight up bull fucking shit and 100% speculative.

                I highly advise you not to make such blatant non-sequitur fallacies devoid of any supportive data. I can think of at least a half a dozen other reasons for why people voted or didn’t vote the way they did that actually has data with infinitely less distance to connect the dots than what you’re doing right now.

                • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  We don’t know the why, but it was a big swing among men of color:

                  https://navigatorresearch.org/2024-post-election-survey-racial-analysis-of-2024-election-results/

                  The largest shifts in support were seen among men, particularly men of color. Donald Trump won the vote of Hispanic men by one point (49 percent Harris – 50 percent Trump), a 35-point difference from 2020, when Joe Biden won the vote of Hispanic men by a 34-point margin. Similarly, there was a 35-point difference in how Black men voted in 2024 compared to 2020. While Black men voted for Harris in 2024 by a 47-point margin (71 percent Harris – 24 percent Trump), it was significantly less than Biden who won the vote of Black men by an 82-point margin over Trump in 2020. White men also moved toward Trump by 5 points (net +23; 37 percent Harris – 60 percent Trump), compared to his margin of 18 points in 2020 (40 percent Harris – 58 percent Trump).

                  Without some very careful probing via polls, getting to the why is going to be harder, most likely. Not too many people are just going to be absolutely candid about being sexist.

                  • lennybird@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    4 days ago

                    I have some insight as to why. As someone who canvassed, who actively spoke to Hispanic activists for Trump in person no less. Though I’ll leave that alone considering its anecdotal nature unless you’re interested.

                    Statistically, these groups – men across the board – are significantly less educated and thus susceptible to misinformation. They were explicitly targeted from GamerGate and onward.

                    If you break down exit-polling, you’ll find a key factor in predicting how someone voted was in fact their education attainment and less so their gender or skin color.

                    Does that mean they were less likely to vote for Harris? Yes, but it also means they’d be less likely to vote for any Democrat. More importantly, those who are actual bigots voting on pretenses of skin color or sex were core maga already.

                    Put it another way: An Old White Guy Joe Biden was polling worse than Harris. At the same time, Reuters polling has always shown Michelle Obama – female person of color – to poll higher against Trump than literally anyone. Ever.

                  • factborg9000@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    The Navigator Research numbers here are worth scrutinizing. They claim Biden won Hispanic men by 34 points in 2020. That’s a massive outlier. AP VoteCast, which surveyed 110,000+ voters, found Biden won Hispanic men by roughly ~10-12 points. Other sources like Pew and Edison exit polls show similar single-digit to low-double-digit margins, not 34 points. A 35-point shift would be historically unprecedented.

                    Edison Research (official NEP exit poll provider): Biden won Latino men 59%-36% (+23) in 2020.
                    https://www.edisonresearch.com/latino-male-voters-shift-toward-trump-in-2024-election/

                    Pew Research Center (validated voter study): Biden won Hispanics overall 59%-38% (+21) in 2020.
                    https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2021/06/30/behind-bidens-2020-victory

                    AP VoteCast: “About 6 in 10 Latino men went for Biden” in 2020 (~60%, roughly +20 margin).
                    https://apnews.com/article/election-harris-trump-women-latinos-black-voters-0f3fbda3362f3dcfe41aa6b858f22d12

                    The key weakness is that Navigator uses recalled 2020 vote data from a 2024 survey and their 34-point figure is contradicted by every major contemporaneous survey of the 2020 electorate.

        • TheMadCodger@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          That’s one of the many problems with this system. The DNC is a private organisation and they can put forth or hold back any candidate they want regardless of the will of the people (see: Harris or Sanders the first time).

          So unless the DNC finally gets out of its own way (it won’t) and lets an actual progressive candidate run, they’ll do the same thing they always do and pick some Milquetoast “centrist” who will keep the status quo, and an actual progressive will have to run independent or form a new party and then get enough people to vote for them without splitting the vote and causing the Nazis to win by default.

          The entrenched powers have no interest in change and don’t care what the people actually want.

    • MartianRecon@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      You know most of them won’t because he doesn’t support their personally cut together version of Das Kapital.

      Like it or not, Gavin is one of the few Dems who actually has signed progressive laws in this country. But because he looks the way he do the ‘identity politics’ people can’t help but judge him because of that.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        He also made homelessness illegal and held back plenty of other progressive laws, but yeah sure it’s identity politics.

        • MartianRecon@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          Sure discount the numerous pieces of progressive legislation the guy has passed. I swear you people can never, ever, find a positive to say about people.

            • MartianRecon@lemmus.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              4 days ago

              Sure dude. Gavin’s passed more progressive legislation than anyone else in the country. Listen to the Active Measures people and attack someone who’s on your side, and probably would give you guys a solid chunk of legislation that you would support. But you know, he’s not giving you 100% so sit on the fucking sidelines like always o7.