Within Russia, the war has come under growing criticism as Ukraine has ramped up strikes inside the country and Russian casualties keep growing … These deadly attacks are a ‘sign of desperation’ as Putin is realising he might not win the war.

Here is an Invidious alt for the video (4 min) inside the linked article.

Archived

  • FerretyFever0@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    I suppose that’s true. I just think that there should some sort of semi-permanent punishment for a nation purposefully murdering the citizens of another in order to steal their land. If a nation is attempting to gain territory through violent means and ends up losing it instead, then I see that as a fitting punishment.

    • Bob Robertson IX @discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      there should some sort of semi-permanent punishment for a nation purposefully murdering the citizens of another in order to steal their land

      Easy, the leaders of that nation should be executed.

      • FerretyFever0@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        Personal consequences for the powerful making fucked up decisions certainly dissuades similar behaviors in the future, but this is not the only thing that should happen. The people that have suffered should receive a tangible benefit of some kind.

    • Barbarossa@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      It certainly would be deliciously ironic for them to lose land in a war of conquest, but sanctions until they make tangible reparations to rebuilding the country they invade is a little more practical

      • FerretyFever0@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        You’re right, it’s mostly just a thought that I had. I think it’s unlikely that they’re awarded any more than Crimea as far as land goes.

    • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Historically, that’s typically what happened. If the aggressor was beaten back, the defender could decide to push them a little extra back and grab some land or a “buffer zone”. Some years later, the aggressor is mad that they lost land, and have constructed a story about how they were the victims (after all, they’re the ones that ended up losing land). Of course, they need to “retake their stolen land”, so you get a new war. Rinse and repeat every couple decades, and you have European history up until about 1945.

      • FerretyFever0@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        You are correct. If and when reparations are decided they will most likely be monetary. I mostly like the irony, but that doesn’t make it the best option available.

        • Goodeye8@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          If the attacking country is a nuclear country they need to give some of their nuclear arsenal away.